Regular blogger, Phillip Ang, shared an image of Temasek Holding’s management team on his Facebook page on Sunday (16 August) while highlighting the composition between local and foreign talents.

Specifically, the image shows 29 members of the company’s management team as listed on its website. The image noted that 14 of them are foreigners, or 48%. It questions, “Do Singaporean PMETs have any hope when Temasek is managed by 48% foreigners?”

Mr Ang, in his caption, also asked, “Temasek says Ho Ching is not among the top 5 highest paid in Temasek but are there others paid above $100 million? Why is Temasek afraid to disclose total management cost and salary breakdown?”

Image from Phillip Ang / Facebook

The question of Temasek CEO Mdm Ho’s salary often crops up in public debate. In April, a Taiwan news site even claimed that she earns about S$99 million a year or S$300,000 a day as the incumbent Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer of Temasek Holdings.

Though it rarely ever addresses the matter of remuneration of its top management, this time Temasek addressed the claims of Mdm Ho’s salary directly, merely saying that the claim is “false”. Temasek also noted that her annual compensation is not the highest within the firm nor is she among the top five highest paid executives.

Now, another issue that is especially pertinent during these trying times, is the country’s dependence of foreign labour. It was one of the major issues of the recent general election, but was already being debated as the fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in many people losing their jobs and being retrenched.

The question of securing jobs for Singaporeans and ensuring that Singaporeans are protected from retrenchments has been argued by political parties on all sides as well as activists and experts.

Looking at Temasek specifically, though, we wanted to know how the composition of its team has changed over the years.

In 2011, according to the annual Temasek Review, senior management of Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund consisted of 43 people which included managing directors of different departments and regions. Of those, 10 were foreigners. That’s roughly only 23% of all senior management.

Compare this to nine years later in 2020, it’s clear that the composition has tipped towards more foreigners in senior management positions. Now, almost half of Temasek’s top executives are not Singaporeans.

As Mr Ang asked in his Facebook post, “Do Singaporean PMETs have any hope when Temasek is managed by 48% foreigners?”

In early April when Singapore was just starting to feel the pinch of the economic impact caused by the global pandemic, a redditor highlighted how his company retrenched six out of 11 Singaporeans, including himself. The other 33 staff, all foreigners, were retained.

More recently in early August, aircraft engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney announced that it had retrenched 20 per cent of its workforce in Singapore. One of the companies called Eagle Services Asia is a joint venture between Pratt & Whitney and SIA Engineering. Eagle Services had initially wanted to retrench 144 workers, with 56 per cent of them being Singaporeans, according to the Managing Director of Eagle Services Asia, Yip Ying Kiong.

Following a legal strike and a renegotiation with the aviation unions, the retrenchment process was “corrected”, leading to the final list consisting of 144 workers still, with 44 per cent being Singaporeans.

Given the way things are turning out, Singapore’s major business chamber, the Singapore Business Federation (SBF), has come forward to urge employers to only opt for retrenchment as a last resort. It added that if that is the path they choose, the company should then ensure that the exercise does not erode the its proportion of local staff.

SBF chairman Lim Ming Yan said, “If companies need to retrench, they should have in place fair criteria that protect their Singaporean core and yet retain talent necessary for growth.”

Subscribe
Notify of
34 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

UK High Commissioner for Singapore defends POFMA in letter to the Economist

Ms Foo Chi Hsia, UK High Commissioner for Singapore has defended the…

韩国政府吁民众戴口罩防疫

由于韩国确诊病例急速暴增,周日更上升至169确诊病例,韩国目前已将武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)疫情警示等级,提升为最严重的“红色”第四级,以遏制武汉冠状病毒的传播。 韩国目前人口逾5千100万人,自韩国确诊病例暴增以来,目前已逾700例,而韩国也开始提出各项预防措施。 许多韩国人几乎每天都带着口罩生活,而且韩国当局的警告也随处可见如预防感染三撇步:随时戴口罩;使用肥皂洗手超过30秒;并在咳嗽时用手遮盖,避免传染。 此外,韩国人也开发了数个预防感染应用程式和网站,让韩国国民能够即使得知感染者在10公里半径内的位置。 与此同时,韩国重灾区大邱市与清道郡亦被列为“特别护理区”,大部分大邱市的街上已不像往常那般热闹,冷冷清清。 除了教会的“可能感染源”,所有军事基地在检测出三名士兵呈阳性后,均都被封锁,韩国当局亦怀疑其疫情均源自于清道郡。 与此同时,我国政府在早前曾建议新加坡人若健康状态良好,就不需要带上口罩。这样的“贴士”在网络上与报纸上宣传。然而,随着2月7日我国进入橙色警戒状态后,这样的呼吁也随之减低。 陈振声:若领导都戴口罩出席记者会    所有人都恐慌 事实上,新加坡中华总商会(SCCCI)的闭门会议,贸工部长陈振声向一群商人与基层领袖解释为何他们不赞成让健康的人戴口罩 ,其中一段录音被泄露,从中陈振声表示,“我们是否有足够口罩,将取决于三种因素:口罩储备、口罩使用率以及再补口罩的频率。…

COI to police: “A lot of things were wrong”

By Andrew Loh / Terry Xu “What has happened is not acceptable,”…

Does Nparks have unfettered discretionary powers to impose bans?

By Andrew Loh The Nparks’ withdrawal of its approval for activist Han…