Photos taken from Khung Wai Yeen’s Facebook

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) member Khung Wai Yeen has responded to a netizen’s comment that alleged SDP candidates are “lazy” to do groundworks, saying that the Party’s members also have “family and work commitment” to fulfil like any other person.

Mr Khung took to Facebook on Tuesday (28 July) claiming that one netizen has commented on his post about the election on 13 July and created a post calling some of the SDP members “lazy” for not attending the Party’s walkabout at Marsiling-Yew Tee (MYT) on 25 July.

The SDP member also uploaded a couple of screenshots of the netizen’s comments.

In one of the screenshots, the netizen made a post calling the SDP candidates “lazy” and “always have a lot of excuses for not doing groundworks”, adding that the Party only attracts “lazy people”.

The post was referring to the post made by SDP’s Bryan Lim who noted that the SDP’s Damanhuri bin Abas and Mr Khung will not be attending the Party’s walkabout in MYT due to family emergencies, while fellow member Ben Pwee had sprained his ankle.

Replying to the netizen’s post, Mr Khung revealed that his family member has just passed away, while Mr Damanhuri’s family member was in critical condition and hospitalised, which explained why they were unable to attend the SDP’s walkabout at MYT.

“As much as we want to do our part for fellow Singaporeans, we do have family and work commitment just like any other person. It is supremely unhelpful and toxic with comments like yours,” he noted.

As for the second comment, the netizen questioned Mr Khung’s effort in doing groundworks for the residence of MYT and asked how many doors he has knocked.

In response, Mr Khung said that he has made about 60 visits – for both walkabouts and house visits – over the last three years, and have covered about 90 blocks of flats. He claimed that he had probably knocked approximately 9,000 doors and reached a conservative of 12,000 to 15,000 residents so far.

“Is there a quota that you think qualifies someone to be electable, let me know. The vote in your hands is not a reward system to be given to the person who have done something for you that you like,” he stated, as he thanked the netizen for the comment.

Mr Khung explained his decision to stand in the election with the SDP was because of the Party’s proposed policies which he believes “will help a large segment of society” in Singapore and support the poor and old Singaporeans to “live a life of dignity”.

“I hope that people share that view with us and vote for us to realise our policies. Unfortunately we were not elected this time round, but we will try again,” he remarked.

“We are not political super beings but ordinary humans,” says SDP’s Bryan Lim

Meanwhile, SDP’s Bryan Lim also took to Facebook on Wednesday (29 July) to speak out for his fellow SDP members who were being called “lazy” by the netizen.

Mr Lim noted that both Mr Khung and Mr Damanhuri are in need of private space and time to mourn the losses of their family members, adding that they are “ought to be respected”.

“Sometimes, we need to be that extra sensitive before we make a passing comment,” he said.

Mr Lim had also visited Mr Pwee after the walkabout at MYT and noticed that he was “hobbling badly” with an umbrella that he used as a makeshift walking stick.

He went on to share about his father who was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease a few months ago, and his mother who has lost much of her eyesight since early of this year due to a “viral attack” and that her dementia is not recovering.

“However, against all odds, the 4 of us have sacrificed precious time with our loved ones for the greater cause of SDP,” Mr Lim added.

Aside from the activities that were posted on the Party’s Facebook pages, he said that people do not get to see the “behind-the-scenes work” that the Party members involved.

“We don’t do all these for the thunder & glory. In fact, there is not much glory to speak about when you are in the Opposition here in Singapore. Not only do we get misunderstood, misinterpreted & ridiculed, we risk being POFMA-ed & sued if we take a misstep,” Mr Lim asserted.

He further remarked, “We are not political super beings but ordinary humans who have decided to step forward to fight for true democracy, justice & equality.  And it is precisely this sense of humanity that has made who we are today.”

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

法官陈成安为前女佣翻案 两年前亦曾反对康希等六被告减刑

近两周来狮城最热门议题,莫过于高庭推翻国家法院判决,为印尼籍前女佣巴蒂莉雅妮的偷窃罪名翻案。后者终获沉冤得雪,摆脱纠缠四年的官司。 高庭法官陈成安,在判词中质疑,报警指控巴蒂偷窃的廖文良一家,可能存在“不当意图”(improper motives),有理由相信廖文良为了阻止女佣到人力部投诉,所以廖家父子先发制人,突然解雇女佣,不让后者有时间去人力部。 再加上所谓“赃物”移交警局过程也存在疑点,这迫使包括总检察署、警方等各造,在有关判决之后,都表明需重新检讨此事,探讨是否采取进一步行动。 尽管众人皆期待总检察署等能给出令人满意的调查结果,不过此次翻案审讯,也令不少人开始注意到高庭法官陈成安和巴蒂的辩护律师阿尼尔(Anil Balchandani )。 在上周,本地客工组织发布阿尼尔的专访影片,其中可得知处于弱势的女佣、客工往往在面对诉讼时处于下风,有时甚至直接道歉或认罪,对他们而言更为简便,经过审讯后就被遣返回国,但这本身就是一种不公正。 至于法官陈成安,当年曾和国务资政兼国家安全统筹部长张志贤、前外交部长杨荣文在圣约瑟书院就读,成绩顶尖。原本从伦敦大学毕业后成为工程师,但后来转换轨道攻读法律,成为执业律师,也曾在总检察署担任署理检控官。 陈成安任法官期间亦审理过不少大案。其中也包括举国轰动的城市丰收教会失信案。 2017年,城市丰收教会案上诉,高庭三司:赵锡燊、吴必理和陈成安共同审理。然而,在审讯中三司对严重失信罪看法出现歧见。 2017年:三司对康希等人严重失信罪存歧见…

SPP’s Jose Raymond calls out alleged “racial stereotyping” in Singapore Kindness Movement poster on cleanliness

Singapore People’s Party (SPP) chairman Jose Raymond took to his Facebook on…

Police conducting extensive investigations on two individuals who allegedly violate cooling off day regulation

Roy Ngerng Yiling and Teo Soh Lung are now being extensively investigated…

Newsbites – NEA hogs headlines, ST apes MDA

AHPETC and NEA goes to court The trial dates for the case…