Source: Reddit / Facebook

A user took to Reddit’s Singapore community page to seek advice on what she claimed is self-radicalisation of her father due to his consumption of extreme pro-China content. 

The daughter, who goes by the handle “poppraline”, posted a thread on this issue on Friday (24 Jul) – two days before Dickson Yeo’s case was reported. She shared how her father was watching videos “day, afternoon and night” that propagated the strength and prowess of China.  

He gained this interest about a year or so ago. 

Some of the video content she cited were: 

  • China is a lion that is only sleeping right now
  • The islands in the South China sea are China’s

    • China got them first in a past dynasty
    • All other countries opposing China are flawed, barbaric, have violent histories, etc. and they should be ashamed
    • They used to be under the barbaric rule of the West, and (Chinese) should side with China instead
  • Back when the Hong Kong courts overturned the mask ban last year, one video talked about the judges involved: “Foreigners are not Chinese, they don’t have Chinese blood, that’s why they don’t care about China.”

Self-radicalisation is the action or process of an individual adopting radical positions on political or social issues by challenging the legitimacy of established norms and policies

According to the New York Times, radicalisation is a “four-stage process” – pre-radicalisation, self-identification, indoctrination and extremism – that funnels people into terrorism. 

  • “Pre-radical” is to belong to a particular community
  • “Self-identify” is to accept and internalise its belief system
  • “Indoctrination” means being groomed by an organisation
  • “Extremism” is the pledging of allegiance to a terrorist organisation and accepts that violence is a legitimate way to obtain its goals

The process of radicalisation varies for each individual and can take place over an extended period or within a very short time frame. 

The beginning of the radical views

“All this began when our Chinese TV channels started showing mainly shows from China, and removed most shows from Taiwan. He got interested in watching those shows online, and got steadily into angrier-sounding videos through recommendations,” she wrote. 

She said she is bombarded by anti-US videos all day that speak with robotic voices. 

As a result of this, she realised that her father has started verbalising “increasingly extreme and hostile comments” like:

  • Spouting conspiracy theories about SARS and COVID-19 being a western weapon targeting Asian races
  • Dismissal of other reports that claimed it might have originated from other countries, such as Germany
  • Using “angmoh” as a slur against white people
  • Gloating that more “angmohs” are dying from COVID-19, meaning they are inferior to the Chinese
  • Joking about invading the US because they seem weak right now

She continued that her mother is starting to be influenced as she echoes the superiority of China in handling COVID-19 fatalities. 

Similar experiences shared on Reddit

At time of writing, it garnered 396 comments. Other users replied to her post to detail the experiences of their family members as well.

Subscribe
Notify of
59 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

尚拖欠用户押金 oBike转账1千万元到香港账户

无桩脚车出租公司oBike将1千万元款项汇到香港账户,清盘公司正尝试索回这笔款项,以期归给新加坡的债权人。 oBike公司共向用户收取了1千170万新元的抵押金和充值,其中有130万用来支付本地运营费用、40万元在清盘时退还给用户,但其中的1千万新元却被作为预付款项(pre-payment),汇到oBike香港账户。 oBike香港在公司宣布推出新加坡市场的一个月前,声称用1千万元购买了7万辆脚车。前者即以上述1千万元抵消公司买脚车的费用。 仍有22万500名用户,还未收到他们的退款,涉及数额890万新元。 在昨日(8月2日)举行的债权人大会,oBike临时清盘人富理诚咨询有限公司(FTI Consulting)获推举为正式清盘人,该公司向现场30多名用户和物流业者报告oBike公司清盘进展。 “转账到香港账户不恰当” 富理诚公司代表约书亚泰勒直言,oBike公司把1千万元作为“预付款项”转到香港账户的做法不恰当,也相信有关款项并不是买脚车的费用,因有另一独立账户记录,购买脚车的拨款。 他说,oBike公司无权抵消预付款项和贷款账户。清盘公司将向oBike香港索回上述款项。后者提议只归还35万新元,清盘公司认为“无法接受。” oBike公司创办人之一石一,曾承诺会全额归还所有用户抵押金。泰勒表示,他们将向oBike香港和石一发出索偿信函。 石一在oBike Global有23巴仙股份,总值100多万美元。…

《海时》将情义之家影片加自家水印 惹争议急撤短片!

本地客工组织情义之家(HOME),在本月9日上载采访律师阿尼尔的影片。阿尼尔在近期备受关注的印尼籍前女佣巴蒂胜诉案件,担任巴蒂的辩护律师。阿尼尔在影片中阐述在本地工作缺乏保护,他们的声音已被忽略,也阐述巴蒂案件辩护过程面对的各种挑战。 情义之家是在法庭作出裁决前一周录制,并在判决后,于前日播出。不过,本地英语大报《海峡时报》,竟将有关短片稍作编辑,加上自家《海时》商标水印,就直接发布到该报的官方脸书专页! 事件引发不少读者不满,本地学者Stephii Chok就在脸书斥责,《海时》把情义之家的原影片进行编辑,而整体设计让读者看起来,会误以为是《海时》制作的。 她强调,影片始终是情义之家的知识产权,《海时》若要采用也应该事先征求情义之家的同意,又或者直接分享有关影片链接即可。 她也指出,巴蒂一案的审讯是在公开法庭,从国家法院的审讯开始至巴蒂被判刑,《海时》本可同时采访控辩双方说法, 包括巴蒂和辩护律师阿尼尔的说词,但在过去却只放大检控官的论述。 但如今为了追求点击率,《海时》却直接使用情义之家的影片,有剽窃之嫌,令她不敢恭维。 Dear The Straits Times,…

女骑士意外重伤不治 家属网上寻求目击者

日前一名女骑士在义顺发生车祸,被送到医院急救时不治身亡,其家属寻求目击者,希望能够了解事发过程。 据称是28岁女死者Fadhilah Hussain亲属的网友,在网上帖文,希望能够借助网络力量,寻获目击者。 她在帖文中提到,有关的夺命意外于本月14日下午约6时,发生在义顺8道,朝义顺44街方向的路段,骑着军绿色的本田电单车,车牌号码为CB150R。 她怀疑有关意外是撞后逃,因此希望目击者与她联系,了解事情经过。警方受询时证实上述事故。 他们表示于周二(14日)傍晚5时25分接获投报,指有一名伤重昏迷的女骑士被送入邱德拔医院,随后不治身亡。 警方也表示,他们尚在调查有关案件。 有关帖文上载后,网民纷纷留言致哀,且已经被转发了超过1300次。 部分网民也猜测是撞后逃的意外,更猜测女死者在意外发生时并没有戴头盔,才会导致重伤夺命。 除此之外,网民也询问发布帖文者,为何不检查附近的闭路电视记录,或许很快就会有答案了。

ST Forumer confident of “more blessings to come” to SGs while elderly struggles to retire

Following the publishing of a Straits Times article from an American professor,…