In the midst of public concerns over the minimum wage, Taiwanese-based Singaporean activist and blogger Roy Ngerng Yi Ling took to his Facebook earlier today (16 July) to comment on Singapore ministers getting paid with the “highest salaries in the world” yet refusing to implement minimum wage, saying that this is “not normal” and constitute as an “abuse to Singapore’s workers”.

Mr Ngerng regarded this practice by the ministers as “selfish entitled hypocrisy”, given that the ministers are reluctant to pay higher wages to Singaporeans but at the same time, allow themselves to have high salaries.

“Why do they allow themselves to have the highest minimum ministerial salaries in the world, but refuse to implement minimum wage for Singaporeans? Then why should they have a minimum salary? Why such selfish entitled hypocrisy?

“What the PAP is doing is not normal. In fact, it is abuse to Singapore’s workers.”

He mentioned that in other countries where ministers are paid higher salaries, the citizens are also paid higher wages and have higher minimum wages.

In his post, Mr Ngerng shared a chart which shows a comparison between the salary of political leaders and minimum wages that are implemented in other countries.

The chart was published by The News Lens in an article titled, “The Crazy Rich Salaries of Singapore’s Ministers Versus the Poor Peasants Who Support Them” which compares the salaries earned by the Singapore ministers with other countries’ political leaders.

The article also noted that Singapore pays the highest salary for its political leaders as compared to other countries but at the same time, also pays the lowest wages among other similarly high-income countries.

Addressing those who are complaining about the minimum wage policy, Mr Ngerng asked, “Have you seen these countries collapse? Have they lost their productivity? Have they lost their ability to innovate? Have they been wiped off the existence of this planet?”

“Only in Singapore are the PAP ministers paid the highest salaries in the world, while still refusing to implement minimum wage, and where workers earn so much lower salaries than them.”

Mr Ngerng went on to say that the salaries rate between Singaporeans and Singapore’s Ministers should be paid correspondingly; if not, then the ministerial salaries should at least be reduced to match Singaporeans’ salaries.

“Basically, if they want to earn their high salaries, then Singaporeans should be paid significantly higher wages correspondingly. If they are unwilling to let Singaporeans earn higher wages, then they should bring down their salaries to match Singaporeans, which at the rate Singaporeans are paid, means the prime minister should only earn S$200,000 a year – because this is what representing Singaporeans is about.

“Until now, we still do not know – if it is not S$99 million, then what it is?”

Subsequently, Mr Ngerng asserted that “those who lecture about the minimum wage” should “get off from their high horses” and try to have the same lower wages of Singaporeans before telling Singaporeans not to ask for more.

“Or maybe, we should set a maximum wage so that they do not keep siphoning off our money, while we do not know how it is being used.

“They tell us high salaries will make them not corrupt. In the end, what we get are much lower wages.”

Mr Ngerng has raised the same issue last year regarding how the Singapore Government has kept the wages low even though the locals are struggling to make ends meet.

He lambasted the remarks made by the Members of Parliaments (MPs) over the financial difficulties faced by low-income households, saying that it’s obvious that people cannot make their ends meet simply because their wages are too low.

Mr Ngerng stated that the majority of PAP MPs are “powerless” because they have to listen to the top leaders of the party.

The blogger also explained that PAP will not increase wages as some of the biggest companies are owned by Temasek. As one would presume for Temasek to continuously garner higher earnings, low wages have to be maintained for the people.

“This is the same reason why Singaporeans cannot earn enough inside their CPF to retire, because the GIC, which uses money funnelled from the CPF into bonds and reserves, can only earn higher earning when Singaporeans earn low CPF payouts.”

WP’s Jamus Lim: Min wages is not unabashedly good policy. But it is a good start that is also evidence-based

Responding to the negative reactions that have emerged about The Workers’ Party’s manifesto for GE2020, WP’s Jamus Lim on Tuesday (14 July) had said that implementing minimum wage in Singapore is “not unabashedly good policy”, but it’s rather a “good start that is also evidence-based”.

Dr Lim explained that there is rarely “unambiguous evidence” in social sciences, adding that studies can produce difference results, which is why continued research is important & policies should be based on the overall literature.

He went on to explain that nearly all meta-analyses in the UK and US “find little or no employment effects” from minimum wages.

“Of course, there are country-specific idiosyncrasies. That’s why before rolling out such a policy here, it is crucial that we have an evaluation framework in place, and an independent min wage-setting board, which can make on-the-fly adjustments in response to local conditions.”

Dr Lim, who is part of the winning team in Sengkang GRC for GE2020, also pointed out that consumers and firms pay for the minimum wage, and not the Government.

“Who pays for the minimum wage? Some people think this would cost the government. Actually, most min wage models have no fiscal impact, and the burden is borne mostly by higher prices consumers pay (3/4), and in part by firms (1/4).

“I see this as a feature, not a bug. The point is to redistribute some bargaining power from capital to labor, and I think we can afford to chip in a little to take care of the least well-off in society. With many more buyers than min wage workers, the price effect will be small.”

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国大采纳检讨委会建议 未来严重性犯罪者或立即开除

国大采纳检讨委员会提出的十项建议,加重处置措施,其中针对严重罪行者立即开除。 国大校董会董事郭运光,今早以委员会主席发出电邮给学生、教师以及教职人员,透露最新调查结果,表示委员会针对犯罪行为探讨研究国际最佳范例、向各个学生、教职人员进行15个一对一的对话以及委聘独立调查机构向全校师生进行网络调查,最终制定出更完善的新处置框架。 处置框架含将在送往实习公司或聘雇公司的成绩单上注明停学记录;而记录将在毕业后延续一段时间;停学至少一年以上,同时将以“犯下严重罪行”为由,禁止进入校内及不允许与受害者接触;罪行严重者将会被开除。 另外,犯罪者需经医疗专业者或辅导者的检定,才能重返校园,每一名犯罪者都需配一名个案负责官员全程监督过程,并在康复治疗提供支持。 而针对受害者的支持系统,调查委员会提议国大应加强相关资源介入,建立受害者关怀中心,聘雇辅导、社工、心里相关的专业人士及时提供受害者紧迫的需求;加强受害者支持网络,在同侪、宿舍、学院、学系之间建立支持网络系统,及时提供相关讯息、建议。 此外,委会认为近年来性犯罪案件层出不穷,故呼吁国大需提升校园安全性如加强校内的淋浴间的保护措施,也增加了宿舍的保安人员人数,而在全校宿舍洗澡间内也会安装新的洗澡间锁扣,同时至少安装300架新的监视录像。 国大董事会表示全面接受调查委员会提供的意见,而国大校长陈永财教授下来将在未来重新审视委员会提出的意见,并公布落实上述建议的具体计划。为了确保有关框架的有效性,国大也会两年后重新检讨,确保框架合适性。 国大校长陈永财教授下来几天内会公布落实上述建议的具体计划。国大董事会两年后也会重新检讨纪律框架,确保有关框架有效且合时宜。 4月18日,受害者马芸在Instagram分享了她对国大没有对于去年11月,在尤索夫宿舍厕所偷拍她的Nicholas Lim给予更多处罚,感到沮丧。此事很快在国大学生和社会界中引起热烈议论,认为涉事者未获得应有的处罚,而没给予受害者足够的保护。 国大校长陈永财教授随后向国大校友发函道歉,坦言没有第一时间为受害者提供足够协助,而教育部长王乙康则表示有关的处罚“明显不足”。 也有国大学生群组公开,国大三年内有超过20起涉及非礼、偷拍等违规行为;国大也在4月25日,于校内举办与学生对话会,逾700学生挤爆现场,其中包含多名受害者出面叙述及抨击国大在不当性行为处置上过轻,要求重新调整处分制度。同时,国大校方成立检讨委员会检讨惩处框架。

Feeding our babies to the economy monster

Think outside the economic to raise birth rates, says Andrew Loh.

MP Tin says MacPherson estate has rich heritage but avoids mentioning declining asset value of flats there

Channel News Asia published a news on Tuesday (4 Dec) highlighting that…