Connect with us

Media

Former journalist in Singapore reveals her encounters with media censorship in Mediacorp

Published

on

A former journalist in Singapore shared her reporting experience on Twitter, revealing some of her encounters with media censorship that happened in Mediacorp, the national public broadcaster.

“Only writing about things I’ve heard and experienced. First, at the old building in Caldecott, there was a censorship room. The door plate literally said ‘censorship’,” she wrote in a Twitter thread – which has since been deleted – on Wednesday (15 July).

According to her, journalists in Singapore who intend to do a vox pop – short interviews with members of the public – outside of Parliament would need to obtain permission from the Government in advance.

“I remember submitting info like my name, ID number, nationality and race with those from my crew,” said the former journalist.

She was also informed by a producer friend, who just got her Permanent Residence (PR) in Singapore, that journalists who are not Singapore citizens, including PR are not allowed to do coverage on the General Election (GE).

Other instances were when her TV script – which covered about Singapore’s athletes had to do crowdfunding themselves for the Olympics due to lack of Government support – was “ruthlessly edited” without her knowledge.

“Above was taken out only to be replaced w[ith] paragraphs of available gov[ernment] scholarships (mostly academic scholarships…),” she added.

Expressing her curiosity on the series of MRT incidents occurred in Singapore between 2017 and 2018 – including the train collision at Joo Koon MRT station on November 2017 which she claimed was called a “bump” by the state-media – she asked a former reporter at Mediacorp on why no media was looking into it.

But the response that she received was, “This is Singapore”.

The former journalist went on to share about the coverage on smart factories in Singapore which she was assigned to by her superior, claiming that the Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) had given four “options” and asked her to “let them know” the companies that she chose to cover beforehand.

“I got an email from MTI asking me if I’m interested in covering smart factories, which I ignored bc[because] I was working on other stories. My boss, usually terse on email, politely agreed. MTI gave me four ‘options’ – told me to choose two (or one) companies and LET THEM know,” the former journalist added.

The same thing happened when she called the Ministry of Communications and Information (MCI) to inquire about the ratio of Chinese and Malay officers in the Government.

“Idk[I don’t know] exactly what story I was working on but I got curious about the ratio of Chinese vs Malay gov [government] officers so I called the relevant gov comms. Got a call asking what my ‘agenda’ is,” she noted.

Although there are journalists in Singapore who are committed to “legit reporting”, the former journalist opined that it will still be difficult when high-level editors are being appointed from different ministries.

It is “not surprising” to find an editor-in-chief (EIC) at Mediacorp who listed out his “extensive Government relations experience” in the LinkedIn bio, she said.

One netizen – who happens to be a journalist – commented in the thread, saying that there are former officers of the Internal Security Department (ISD) who were appointed to be editors at the Straits Times’ (ST) political desk.

The netizen hinted that the editors would occasionally ask his colleagues “would this make the Government look silly?” on ostensibly non-political stories, which left them wondered if the editors had resigned from the ISD.

Referring to the comment, the former journalist said “To those who [are] not familiar w[ith] ISD (Internal Security Department) in Singapore. Think spy agency”.

Citing the ST’s article titled “HDB officer fined $2,000 for breaching Official Secrets Act by giving confidential info to ST journalist” which was published on 20 December 2017, she stated that the ST journalist’s phone was taken by the authorities without a warrant.

The former journalist was told by her friends – who are Singapore’s journalists – that a Government official went to have a meeting at ST office and display screenshots of the journalist’s private conversation with the HDB officer. She regarded it as a “very disturbing” story to hear.

“Yes, this is why NYT[New York Times] didn’t relocate their digital team to Singapore. It’s a business-friendly place, not for media,” she asserted.

Continue Reading
5 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Hong Kong

Former STAND News journalists jailed for sedition in landmark Hong Kong case

On 26 September 2024, former Stand News chief editors Chung Pui-kuen and Patrick Lam were sentenced in a landmark sedition case. Chung received a 21-month prison term, while Lam’s sentence was reduced due to health issues. The ruling is seen as part of Hong Kong’s crackdown on press freedom.

Published

on

Chung Pui-kuen, former chief editor of the pro-democracy news outlet Stand News

On 26 September 2024, a Hong Kong district court sentenced Chung Pui-kuen, former chief editor of the pro-democracy news outlet Stand News, to 21 months in prison for sedition.

The case, which marks the first time a journalist has been jailed for sedition since Hong Kong’s return to Chinese sovereignty in 1997, is seen as part of an ongoing crackdown on media freedom in the city. Chung, aged 55, had led Stand News during the height of the 2019 pro-democracy protests.

Chung’s co-defendant, Patrick Lam, who also served as a chief editor, received a sentence reduction due to serious health issues, with the judge ruling that a return to prison could endanger his life.

Lam had already spent nearly a year in detention and will not face further jail time.

The two editors were found guilty in August 2024 of “conspiracy to publish and reproduce seditious publications,” under a colonial-era law that carries a maximum two-year prison sentence.

District Court Judge Kwok Wai-kin, who presided over the case, argued that Stand News had engaged in actions that opposed the government rather than genuine journalistic work.

“They were taking part in the so-called resistance,” Kwok stated, pointing to the publication’s support for the pro-democracy movement.

He emphasized the influence of Stand News, which had 1.6 million followers at the time of its shutdown in 2021, claiming that the seditious articles had caused significant, though unquantifiable, damage.

Kwok maintained that prison was the only viable sentence.

International outcry

The sentencing has drawn swift condemnation from international rights organizations and foreign governments.

The United States denounced the convictions as an attack on media freedom, and the European Union called on Hong Kong authorities to stop prosecuting journalists.

Amnesty International’s China director, Sarah Brooks, noted that the ruling seems aimed at fostering a “chilling effect” on the press, discouraging criticism of the authorities both in Hong Kong and abroad. Brooks added that the situation reflects the growing repression of free speech in the former British colony.

Joseph Ngan, Chair of Hong Kong Media Overseas, expressed concern over the broader implications of the case. “This case, with its landmark ruling outlawing criticism of the government, makes clear that Hong Kong has come fully into line with laws prevailing in Mainland China,” Ngan said. He recalled that Hong Kong had been promised freedom of speech after the end of British colonial rule, a promise that, he noted, “is now a distant memory.”

The press freedom watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF) echoed these concerns. Cédric Alviani, RSF’s Asia-Pacific Bureau Director, condemned the imprisonment of Chung and called for his immediate release.

He emphasized that both Chung and Lam were acting in the public interest by reporting on social and political issues in Hong Kong, and he urged the international community to increase pressure on China to secure their freedom, alongside other detained journalists in the city.

The rise and fall of STAND News

Stand News, a non-profit Chinese-language news site, was among Hong Kong’s most influential independent media outlets. At its peak, it had over 1.7 million followers on Facebook and nearly one million on Instagram.

The publication gained significant attention during the 2019 protests, offering extensive coverage of the pro-democracy movement.

In December 2021, the outlet was raided by 200 police officers, leading to the arrest of six journalists, including Chung and Lam.

That same day, Stand News announced its closure and terminated its staff after the government froze its assets, valued at approximately 61 million Hong Kong dollars (US$7 million). Around 70 employees lost their jobs as a result.

The prosecution in the case against Chung and Lam presented at least 17 articles published by Stand News between July 2020 and December 2021 as evidence.

These articles included interviews, profiles, and opinion pieces that the authorities deemed seditious. The trial, which ended in June 2023, saw the two journalists detained for nearly a year before being granted bail under strict conditions, including weekly reports to the police and a prohibition on giving media interviews.

Declining press freedom

In recent years, Hong Kong has seen its ranking in global press freedom indices fall dramatically.

According to Reporters Without Borders, the city dropped to 135th out of 180 countries in its 2024 World Press Freedom Index, a stark contrast to its position just two decades ago when it ranked 18th. Meanwhile, China remains near the bottom of the index, ranking 172nd.

Chinese officials in Hong Kong have rejected international criticism of the sentencing, maintaining that Stand News functioned as a political organization rather than a legitimate news outlet.

The government’s position reflects broader efforts to align Hong Kong’s governance and legal frameworks more closely with those of Mainland China, particularly in terms of controlling dissent and regulating the media.

The sentencing of Chung Pui-kuen underscores the growing constraints on press freedom in Hong Kong, further solidifying the city’s shift away from its reputation as a bastion of free speech in Asia.

Continue Reading

Media

Mediacorp to merge TODAY digital newsroom with Channel News Asia

Published

on

Mediacorp, a state-owned media company under Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, Temasek Holdings, has announced on Wednesday (28 Aug) that the TODAY digital newsroom will merge with Channel News Asia (CNA) on 1 October 2024.

This merger, which will effectively transform TODAY into a digital weekend magazine under CNA, is presented as an effort to consolidate resources and expand CNA’s reach both within Singapore and internationally.

As part of the merger, TODAY will shift its focus to producing long-form analytical features on current issues, in-depth news reports, human interest stories, and opinion pieces under its Big Read brand, which will be published every weekend. This content is intended to supplement CNA’s existing daily digital offerings, with the goal of increasing CNA’s digital traffic and deepening audience engagement, particularly on weekends.

Starting 1 October, the TODAY app and website will no longer be updated, with all new content being channeled through CNA’s platforms. However, TODAY will maintain its social media pages, which will redirect followers to CNA’s digital sites.

Walter Fernandez, Mediacorp’s Editor-in-Chief, framed the merger as a response to global trends, including increased news fatigue and active news avoidance, trends exacerbated by changes in social media algorithms that de-emphasize news content. Fernandez also cited a significant overlap between the digital audiences of TODAY and CNA as a key factor in the decision to merge the two newsrooms.

The merger will not result in job losses, according to Fernandez, as all TODAY staff will be offered roles within CNA. These roles will involve either working on the new weekend magazine or integrating into other teams within CNA, depending on their expertise.

While Mediacorp presents the merger as a strategic response to the evolving media landscape, critics might view this consolidation as part of a broader trend of centralizing media under state influence in Singapore, particularly given Mediacorp’s ownership by Temasek Holdings and the fact that SPH Media Trust, which runs The Straits Times and other vernacular publications such as Lianhe Zaobao, is funded by the Singapore government through a grant of S$900 million.

TODAY, launched in 2000 as a free newspaper and a rival to Streats, another English-language freesheet published by Singapore Press Holdings, quickly rose to prominence as the second-most widely read daily in Singapore. In 2002, TODAY launched a weekend version, WeekendTODAY, which was distributed to homes as a free newspaper and also sold at newsstands for 50 cents.

In 2004, Singapore Telecommunications pulled out of the newspaper venture by selling its 28.51 percent stake in the company for S$13.66 million, following SMRT Corp.’s sale of its 14.56 percent stake for S$3.5 million.

In April 2017, TODAY discontinued its weekend edition, publishing only on weekdays. Later that year, in September, it ceased print publication of its weekday edition, continuing solely as a digital publication.

Despite its achievements, including international recognition for its short-form video content and coverage of youth issues, TODAY has faced significant challenges, such as the controversial suspension of Mr Brown’s column in 2006 after he criticized the government.

The merger also raises questions about the future of media plurality in Singapore, where Mediacorp already holds a dominant position.

Chief Commercial Officer Jacqui Lim sought to reassure advertisers, promising competitive alternatives across Mediacorp’s network, which includes CNA, 8 World, Berita, and Seithi. Lim emphasized that the merger aligns with Mediacorp’s audience-first approach, aiming to provide innovative and effective media solutions.

The post Mediacorp to merge TODAY digital newsroom with Channel News Asia appeared first on Gutzy Asia.

Continue Reading

Trending