• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
  • Volunteer
    • Internship with The Online Citizen
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

Dr Lee Wei Ling calls Bilahari Kausikan’s allegations on Lee Hsien Yang bought Oxley house for S$1 as “baseless” and “false”

Bilahari issues apology on Dr Lee's Facebook page on Tuesday soon after Dr Lee's FB post

by Aldgra F.
14/07/2020
in Current Affairs
Reading Time: 3 mins read
36

Dr Lee Wei Ling refuted Bilahari Kausikan’s – a retired diplomat – allegations that her brother Lee Hsien Yang has bought the 38 Oxley Road property from Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong for S$1 and to make a profit from the property, noting that his allegations are “baseless” and “false”.

During the Cooling-Off Day of the election (9 July), Mr Bilahari posted on Facebook noting that Mr Lee Hsien Yang “eloquently attacks” the system that he has benefited from because he was “prevented from monetising” the property – which initially bequeathed to PM Lee – by his elder brother PM Lee.

He also described Mr Lee Hsien Yang’s excuse for not contesting in the General Election (GE) – that Singapore does not need another Lee in power – was “hollow” and the move was “cowardly”.

In the comment section of Mr Bilahari’s post, a netizen asked him whether Mr Lee Hsien Yang was given the house or he bought it. Mr Bilahari then replied, “His brother (PM) inherited the house and when LHY started bitching about it, sold it to him for SGD 1 dollar”.

He further noted, “I really do not at all mind disagreement but hypocrisy raises my blood pressure, particularly in this case!”

In response to Mr Bilahari’s post, Dr Lee took to Facebook today noting that his allegations were false. She clarified that her brother Mr Lee Hsien Yang had bought the house from PM Lee at market price and donated 50 per cent of the value of the house to charity.

“Bilahari has falsely claimed that my brother Yang bought Oxley Road for $1 and that Yang is angry because he is prevented from monetising the property. Bilahari has no basis to make such a statement,” she wrote.

According to her, Mr Lee Hsien Yang bought the property as he knew that their late father Lee Kuan Yew (LKY) had granted her the right to live in the house for “as long as she wished”.

Dr Lee also cited a statement from the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) and National Heritage Board (NHB) in April 2015, which states that if a decision is made to allow for the demolition of the house, the Government will disallow the site to be redeveloped in a way that would diminish its historical significance.

“To suggest that Yang bought the house with a view to making a profit is completely baseless and false,” she added.

Meanwhile, it is a fact that PM Lee had transferred ownership of the Oxley property to Mr Lee Hsien Yang at market value in 2015 as reported by various news reports. It was also reported that both brothers then each donated half the value of the house to charity.

Soon after Dr Lee made her FB post, Mr Bilahari posted in the comment section, stating that he “stand corrected on that point and apologise for the mistake”.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Tags: Lee Hsien YangLee Wei Ling
For just US$7.50 a month, sign up as a subscriber on Patreon (and enjoy ads-free experience on our site) to support our mission to transform TOC into an alternative mainstream press in Singapore.
Subscribe
Connect withD
Login
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Notify of
Connect withD
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Please login to comment
36 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Recent Posts

  • Police investigating woman who refused to wear mask despite requests from safe distancing ambassador
  • S$262,327 fully raised by Leong Sze Hian to pay defamation damages, cost and disbursement to Singapore Prime Minister
  • 31 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 19 cases in the community
  • What will Dr Goh Keng Swee think of the state of socio-economic affairs in Singapore today?
  • RDU calls for more transparency in MTF’s border control measures
  • RDU: Racism in Singapore – showmanship does not resolve discrimination
  • If hawkers are already paying NEA for cleaning services, can NEA still fine their customers for not clearing up?
  • Minister Ong acknowledges that a “mutant virus” from “higher risk countries” has broken through airport

Trending posts

If hawkers are already paying NEA for cleaning services, can NEA still fine their customers for not clearing up?

Police investigating woman who refused to wear mask despite requests from safe distancing ambassador

Forbes removes 19y/o tech CEO from 30 Under 30 Asia list, amid reports of inconsistencies in his story

Minister Ong acknowledges that a “mutant virus” from “higher risk countries” has broken through airport

Khaw says new job as SPH media chairman disrupts his retirement while 88-yr-old elderly continues to work as airport cleaner

RDU calls for more transparency in MTF’s border control measures

S$262,327 fully raised by Leong Sze Hian to pay defamation damages, cost and disbursement to Singapore Prime Minister

What will Dr Goh Keng Swee think of the state of socio-economic affairs in Singapore today?

31 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 19 cases in the community

SPH retrenches 140 employees amid impact from COVID-19

Load More
July 2020
MTWTFSS
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 
« Jun   Aug »
  • About Us
  • Volunteer
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
  • Contact Us

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

wpDiscuz
36
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply