In a speech live-streamed on the People’s Action Party’s (PAP) Facebook page yesterday (7 Jul), Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam proposed how Singapore can tackle inequality and ensure security through every stage of life – from early childhood to working life to the retirement years (‘Singapore GE2020: Tharman sets out plans for a more united Singapore‘).

“The aim of all our strategies, economic and social, is to have a more fair and just society, where young people have hope, regardless of what social backgrounds they come from… where everyone can advance in their careers regardless of what qualifications they start with, and where our seniors can look forward to living life fully in retirement, and living life with a sense of security,” said Tharman.

“This is about real programmes – real programmes that we keep improving, learning over time what works. Never perfect, but constant improvement.”

He said the Government is levelling the playing field with plans to double expenditure in the pre-school sector over the next few years. The Government will ensure every child, no matter how poor, has access to broadband Internet and a computer at home. This helps children to level up from less fortunate families earlier in their lives, he said.

For the working Singaporeans, the Government would ensure “a massive infusion of skills at every stage of one’s career”.

He took the opportunity to criticise opposition politicians who make “very nice-sounding promises” on what should be done to help seniors, including for CPF payouts to start earlier or for the Government to pay more of Singaporeans’ healthcare costs, such as by subsidising MediShield premiums.

But many of these measures will only end up hurting the very people they are trying to help, he added, resulting in higher tax rates for middle-income households. “Some promises look appealing, but they actually lead to greater inequality over time,” he said.

He also asked Singaporeans to play their part, to find ways to help others, whether they are the elderly, the less privileged or the less educated. He urged the younger Singaporeans to be more involved in their neighbourhoods and in society, and take part in the Singapore Together movement, which was launched by the Government last year.

“We can emerge from Covid not more divided, but with a more cohesive society,” he said.

Prof Koh: We don’t want more Singaporeans to become Grab drivers and angry voters

Meanwhile at the Singapore Bicentennial Conference last October, former Singapore’s UN Permanent Representative Professor Tommy Koh cautioned the 4th generation PAP leaders that one of their priorities should be to make Singapore a more equal society.

These include looking into allegations of discriminatory hiring practices and working to make Singapore a classless society, he told the audience.

“We should not abandon the displaced workers because we don’t want more and more Singaporeans to become Grab drivers or, worse, to join the ranks of the angry voters,” he said.

“Remember this: It was the angry voters who helped to elect President (Donald) Trump in the United States. It was the angry voters in the United Kingdom who voted to leave the European Union.”

Indeed, many Singaporean Grab and taxi drivers are already feeling frustrated with the PAP government.

Former PMET turns cab driver

One good example is former PMET James Lim who regularly blogs about his cab driving experience. He became jobless in his fifties. With a family to support and unable to find a suitable job, he was forced to become a cab driver. He wrote that he blogs so as to make his dull job “a bit more interesting”.

In one of his write-ups, Mr Lim got so frustrated with the policies of the government that he advised young Singaporeans to emigrate if they could.

He said, “With unabated hordes of foreigners still coming in to depress their (Singaporeans’) wages or even displace them at the workplace, reduce them to second-class citizens and a minority in their own country, how much loyalty and love can we expect from local-bred Singaporean for this country down the road?”

“If you’re a young and educated Singaporean family with valuable skill, I would encourage you to migrate to another country,” he added.

At the end of last year, the number of foreign PMETs (Employment Pass and S Pass holders) hit almost 400K at 393,700. This was the largest increase at 3.3% since the last general election in 2015:

 

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Experts predict daily COVID-19 cases in dormitories will drop to below 100 in the next three to four weeks

The number of positive cases of the deadly COVID-19 in migrant workers…

宛如上演“宫斗剧” 泰王妃被剥夺所有军衔与妃子头衔

泰国王室昨日(21日)宣布,王妃施妮娜(Sineenat Wongvajirapakdi)违反臣子行为规范,对国王不忠心,将剥夺所有军衔与妃子头衔,但并没有透露过多细节。 据报道,泰王瓦吉拉隆功(King Vajiralongkorn)今年7月底,才册封34岁的妃施妮娜为王妃,亦是泰國1932年实施君主立宪制以來,首度获得妃子头衔的人。没想到不到三个月,泰国王室便宣告撤走头衔。 声明指出,诗尼娜不仅不尊重王室传统,试图与女王平起平坐,还违抗王室夫妇。 “施尼娜的行为不尊重君主制,在王室官员之间引起冲突,在公众之间造成误会。” 施妮娜于2008年從皇家军队护理学院毕业,曾在泰国与外国受飞行员培训,之后便在王室卫队任职,今年5月获少将军衔。 泰国王室今年8月26日才公布席逾60张妮娜驾驶军机、跳伞等多组照片,引起热议,甚至让王室网站流量过大而当机。殊不知,今日却发出声明要撤出王妃头衔与军衔。 泰国电视台指出,王室指施妮娜不知感恩,行为举止不符王妃头衔,施妮娜不满王妃头衔,处心积虑想当王后,才会引起王室不满 被剥夺所有王室头衔与军衔。

重申“不放心让前囚犯当保安” 有色眼镜看前囚犯   林谋泉挨批 

在上周五(6月8日),蒙巴登国会议员林谋泉一则解释为何前囚犯不适合担任民居保安的脸书评论,引来网民抨击,除了愤慨林谋泉言论已偏离黄丝带运动的精神,也认为政府带着有色眼镜标签有前科者,打击他们重新展开新生活的信心。 林谋泉强调,要警方给第二次机会,说易行难。“如果你是公寓的居民,你会放心让一个在不久前(2016年)有犯罪记录的人当保安吗?有些人不介意,但其他人会。试问有多少家长会让小孩向一名前娈童犯学游泳?”他建议这名前囚犯可以在其他领域如销售或餐饮业任职。 事缘人民党成员乔立盟于本月6日在个人脸书专页揭露,一名居住在波东巴西的居民,在刑满出狱后一直寻找工作。他向新加坡警察部队申请保安执照时,后者鉴于他有前科,以“非恰当适任者”(not a fit and proper person)为由拒绝他的申请。 待业半年  要养4子女 事主向乔立盟申诉,申请德士执照也因有前科被拒。即使已通过保安课程,申请保安执照的过程仍被警方回绝。约30余岁的事主育有4子女,半年来一边找工作,一边打零工养活妻儿,若一直未有稳定收入,一家生计令人堪忧。 据乔立盟指出,事主是前正规步兵,只因在2016年不满妻子被搭讪,而殴伤一名建筑工友,致使事主被判入狱6个月。…

Call for moratorium over plans for Bukit Brown

the following is a media release by Community for Bukit Brown: The…