The National Day Parade (NDP) 2020 Executive Committee has earlier announced on Wednesday (20 May) that NDP2020 will go on despite the COVID-19 outbreak in Singapore that is still progressing to date.
Along with the announcement on its official website, the Committee revealed that Funpack will be distributed to every Singaporean and Singapore Permanent Resident (PR) household. However, this particular move received backlash from a segment of Singaporeans, commenting that it is a “waste of resources”.
Many Facebook users left their opinions regarding the Funpack, saying how it’s “nothing fun” amid a global pandemic.
Some of them suggested to opt-out from receiving the Funpack so that it could be given to people “who really need it”.
To prevent the wastage of resources, a petition was created by an NUS student, Kaushik Ilango, on Change.org for Singaporeans and PRs who do not wish to receive the Funpack.
Describing how 2020 has been “one of the darkest years” for many Singaporeans, Mr Ilango acknowledged the Committee for attempting to bring “happiness and positivity” to the citizens. He also believes that the Funpack would indeed bring joy to many Singaporeans.

“At a time like this, I understand that handing out funpacks, ‘something Singaporeans have a close affinity with’ could certainly bring joy to many of us.”

He went on to express that the resources gathered to make approximately 1.4 million Funpacks could be allocated for better use.

“However, I believe that there could be a much better use of the resources used to make roughly 1.4 million funpacks; such as the perishable goods inside the funpack, the novel single-use items, the manpower to acquire, make and distribute the funpacks and not to mention the planning of it.”

Addressing that not every item included in the Funpack is of long term use, Mr Ilango wrote that many of these Funpacks tend to get thrown away at the end of NDP in the previous years.
Other than that, he is aware that the economic recession is happening in Singapore and that unemployment is on the rise. Therefore, he believed that these resources could, in turn, help the people in need during trying times like this.
As a way to help those people, Mr Ilango would like to give away his Funpack to someone who needs it more than he does. He also wished that these Funpacks would not be discarded irresponsibly by the citizens who do not want them.
To support his point, he stated that the irresponsible disposal of the Funpacks will require more manpower to clean up. Moreover, the student thought that Singapore could take this chance to move towards a zero-waste society.

“This will only require more manpower to clean it up. Singapore could also use this as an opportunity to set the right example of moving towards a zero-waste society in times of rapid climate change to the rest of the world.”

Mr Ilango added that he understood how the Funpack has sentimental value for many and he does not wish to deprive those Singaporeans of that. So he thought that it would be a better idea to let citizens opt-out from receiving the Funpacks.
In an update, Mr Ilango noted that many of those who signed the petition has reached out to him, regarding the details of this issue, like whether the funpack procurement has already occurred and if so what would happen to it, what will the budget be spent on instead, who is in-charge of making the decision etc.
He confessed that he is “not in a better position to answer these than any one of us” and noted that he has since reached out to Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen along with this petition and will keep the petition signatories updated on any developments.
As of writing, more than 40,000 people have signed the petition.

Funpack is a “waste of resources”

Many people left their comments under the petition as an additional way to support this idea.
Yu Shin Chan expressed that the resources utilised into making the Funpack could be “diverted to better causes”. Explaining that the essential workers such as nurses, doctors and cleaners had been working tirelessly, Chan believed that they should be given the priority instead.
Besides that, Chan commented that giving Funpacks is “extremely unsustainable at solving pertinent problems”, and it is also not environmentally friendly.

Kavitha Krishnan stated that the Funpack is “not the best way to encourage solidarity”. And she had also commented that the resources could have been channelled towards helping the people in need, especially the ones impacted by COVID-19.

Many other people had made similar comments about the Funpack, supporting the idea of rejecting the distribution. They believed that it was a waste of resources and money to make these Funpacks, and the money should be utilised to support the nation’s crisis response against COVID-19.

Subscribe
Notify of
9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“在迪拜盖绿洲”,世博会新加坡馆设计方案释出

世界博览会每5年举办一次,各国也纷纷释出设计方案。我国在新加坡城市重建局,以及土地利用规划和保护机构领导下,宣布新加坡馆的设计方案。 根据《CNN》报道此次由新加坡建筑公司WOHA设计,以及Radius experience International建设,在阿拉伯沙漠中创建绿洲,试图打造一个”花园中的城市“,向世界展示新加坡的创新精神,以及作为一个有活力、宜居的自然城市的抱负。 世界顶级设计公司WOHA联合创始人黄文森表示,“我们试图向世界证明在任何一个地方,甚至是在沙漠中,都有可能建立一个自给自足的绿洲。” 参观者将会在地底层进入绿树成荫的世界,将游客带近圆锥体并穿过它们,随后会在经过露天商场平台,除了享受阳光雨棚的遮荫与5-10摄氏度细雾扇的冷却,还可以在此了解关于新加坡的信息,试图打造在炎热的沙漠下,仍然可以保持旅客们的舒适环境。 黄文森指出,新加坡是世界上数一数二的环保城市,因此借由各项技术与绿化的结合,向世界展示新加坡绿化技术与创新。 被问及如何维持室内温度,WOHA表示,该展馆完全依靠太阳能和太阳能海水淡化系统运作,在为期6个月的世博会期间,其能源消耗净值为零。 黄文森补充,他们并希望能够简化所有的工程,透过展馆的展出,可以呈现其可续行,及不会影响其生活品质的技术。

【选举】延长投票时间不寻常 民主党呼吁选举局收回决定

新加坡民主党发文指出,选举局把投票时间延长至10点的决定不寻常,要求该局收回决定,照旧在晚上8时结束。 该党称,许多监选员是先前被告知投票时间至八点,一些监选员无法继续待在投票站。 故此该党指出,这意味着一些投票站的票箱可能处在无人监管的情形,使得选举结果存疑。 该党呼吁选举局把投票时间维持在8点结束。 对于投票时间延长至10时,人民之声党领袖林鼎律师,抨击选举局的决定离谱和混乱。他指出今日该党视察投票站,到四点只有少部分选民出现,并称该党保留对上述决定,和其造成后果的挑战权利。 选举局在今晚(10日)7时许宣布,除了指定居家通知设施的投票站,所有投票站的投票时间将会延长至今晚10点。

AWARE announces five-day festival in November to celebrate 35th birthday

To commemorate the 35th anniversary of its founding in 1985, AWARE, Singapore’s…

警方:未有证据显示 选举官员涉左右老选民投票

本届大选投票日期间,有选民在脸书发文指责,年迈母亲去投票时,监选员涉嫌教唆母亲,该把票投给人民行动党。 选举局当天也发声明,称这是严重指控,监选员只能在投票站特定区域,监督投票过程,但不能协助选民投票。虽然较后贴文撤下,惟当事者也在选举日当天,向警方和选举局投票。 根据英语媒体《新报》报导,时隔近两个月警方回应此事,警方向当事者和其年迈母亲,以及当时在相关投票站当值的选举官员、监选员等录口供。 调查则显示,选民所指的“教唆者”,实则是选举官员,当时上述年迈选民寻求协助,而选举官员则用淡米尔语解释投票过程,包括打开选票,放在投票亭的表面上方,如何使用投票笔,点选属意候选人的空格中。 但警方发言人强调,有关官员未有告诉选民,该投给哪个政党。惟这位80岁老妇,听到两次这位官员用淡米尔语告知她“放在上面”,但没有听到对方清楚提及,要投给哪个政党。 报导指陪同老妇去投票的女儿,告知警方可能老妇和有关官员之间产生沟通误会,当时也是老妇第一次投票而感到紧张。 警方称,未有其他官员或监选员目击或听到,上述选举官员涉嫌影响选民,也没有其他针对该名官员的投诉。 在咨询总检察署后,警方表示不会采取进一步行动。