A Singaporean woman who was seen not wearing a mask and allegedly assaulted a 47-year-old woman at Shunfu Market is under police investigation for voluntarily causing hurt, causing public nuisance, and breaching safe distancing measures.
It is said that the police received a call for assistance on Sunday (3 May) at 12.16pm at 320 Shunfu Road.
The 40-year-old Singaporean woman, who had previously breached safe distancing measures, was not wearing a mask and allegedly assaulted a 47-year-old woman who advised her to don a mask, according to the police preliminary investigations.
“The Police are investigating the woman for voluntarily causing hurt, causing public nuisance and breaching safe distancing measures under the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) (Control Order) Regulations 2020,” the statement read.
The police said they take a serious view of “such abusive and irresponsible behaviour”, especially in the current COVID-19 situation, while urging the member of public to take the circuit breaker measures seriously and observe the safe distancing measures.
This incident was caught on video and it had been circulating on social media on Sunday.
In the footage, the Singaporean woman was seen in public without a face mask and she was also in a heated exchange with a man. The two was then approached by several police officers to dissolve the fight.
At first, the woman was grabbing onto a mobile phone that was held by a man next to her. She could be heard claiming that the phone belonged to her and she could be heard arguing with him as well.
Without the intention to give in, the man stopped her from snatching her phone from him. As he grabbed hold of the woman’s phone on one hand, he proceeded to make a phone call with his mobile phone that was kept in his pocket.
A few moments later, several police officers arrived at the scene and they could be seen talking to the woman. The man had also attempted to explain the situation to the police officers.
As the exchange was going on between the two and the police officers, a man in a hat approached the group and offered a face mask to the woman.
She rejected the face mask and asked the man to leave as she said, “Please mind your own business. Leave me alone”.

 
On Sunday (3 May), Member of Parliament (MP) for Bishan-Toa Payoh Group Representation Constituency (GRC) Chong Kee Hiong took to his Facebook to respond to the incident of a “repeat offender who defiantly refused to don a mask” at Shunfu Market.
Mr Chong wrote, “In a previous incident, this person had been caught and fined.”
He thanked the police officers for “swiftly apprehending the offender on the spot”, and criticised the offender of “such acts of irresponsibility” while the nation is dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Rest assured that this kind of behavior will not be tolerated and offenders will be dealt with according to the law. I urge all BE-T residents to keep vigilant, wear masks when outdoors, and do our part to keep each other safe,” Mr Chong added.

His comments about a repeated offender apparently confirmed the suspicion by netizens that the woman in question was also involved in a similar incident that took place last month (14 April), where the offender was found guilty of breaching the circuit breaker rules and boldly filmed the police officers.
The woman in that story, had insisted to have her meal at Shunfu hawker centre and refused to cooperate with the police officers when being advised to comply with the safe distancing measures.
She even “turned aggressive” and filmed the police officers with her phone. The police officers have later taken down her particulars and issued a S$300 fine to the woman.
As of 14 April, the Government has made the wearing of masks when leaving the house mandatory.
Except for the children below the age of two and those who are engaging in strenuous exercises such as running and jogging, anyone who found flouting the rules the first time will be subject to a S$300 fine.
A second offence will carry a fine of S$1,000 while egregious cases will be prosecuted in court. Foreigners residing in Singapore on permanent resident status or work passes will also have their status or passes revoked.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Ms Teo: Govt, unions and employers all agree retirement, re-employment ages of elderly should be raised

In Parliament today (5 Mar), Manpower Minister Josephine Teo told Parliament that…

Earliest three dormitories isolated with more than 3k COVID-19 cases now, had measles outbreaks in dorm 9-10 months ago

It was reported that the S11 Dormitory @ Punggol (2 Seletar North…

【国会】应对疫情之际调涨税收、费用 梁文辉忧无助坚定民众对政府信任

在当前面对疫情和经济等严峻挑战,国人对政府的信任尤为重要。不过,前进党非选区议员梁文辉就指出,政府一方面出台应付冠病危机的措施,但同时又急着增加税收和水电等收费,并无助于坚定民众对政府领导的信念。 梁文辉在本月14日在国会参与副总理兼财长王瑞杰的部长声明。他列举了近两周内宣布增加成本的部分,首先在9月29日,全民重症保险计划终身健保明年初起,从以往的11.5巴仙增至35.4巴仙,即指保费从每年的1千元增至1千350元。 不过随着保费上涨,保险范围有随之增加,梁文辉坦言,对于因疫情受到打击的人民来说,确实是令人欣慰的消息。 其次,9月30日,新加坡能源有限公司(SP Group)宣布在今年最后一个季度(自10月至12月)上调了9.3巴仙的电费。 “自2012年开始,电力市场自由化以来,却赚取数十亿元,在首次电费上涨后,就在电费上涨的路上“前进”,即使在新加坡人正遭受疫情的打击。” 尽管价格上涨是因为电力公司的成本相对提高,但梁文辉认为,新加坡能源公司可以轻易地从过去赚取的利润中吸收,而不是将增加成本的费用推到消费者身上。 “增加税收和收费显然无法借此提高人们的信心。与此同时,政府却承诺给出冠病19补贴措施,如同给人民一颗糖后,再给你一巴掌。” 另一方面,梁文辉也指出陆路交通局上周也宣布,自10月12日起,将会在中央高速公路六个收费门架提高电子道路收费(ERP)1元,以缓解高峰期的拥挤路况。 梁文辉认为,这无疑给新加坡的家庭户增加了数百元的支出,而且也质疑是否在未来,消费税也会因此提高。 “这些难道不能推迟到以后再实施吗?新加坡能源公司能否以过去的利润来吸收关税的增长?ERP不能再缓缓吗?保费增长也不能再推迟一到两年,因为目前的保险索赔毕竟仍远远低于收取的保费。 梁文辉也表示,虽然政府一直不想透露国家储备状况,但根据目前以公布的资料而言,截至2020年3月底,我国共拥有1.35万亿元的金融资产。…

Sylvia Lim says WP “have to proceed” on plans to contest

[youtube id=”PVlXECHk12k” align=”center” mode=”normal”] The following is the transcript of a statement…