Singapore’s approach to dealing with the COVID-19 virus was once hailed as the ‘gold standard’ by many countries, even the World Health Organisation (WHO) praised Singapore for “leaving no stone unturned” in tracing every COVID-19 cases.
But now Singapore sees a huge jump in cases following a wave of infections that emerged among its massive migrant workers’ population, which contributed almost 80% to the total number of 11,178 infected cases at the time of writing.
The country is facing the one question that began surfacing in many media reports from worldwide, “why didn’t the Singapore Government address the issue of the migrant workers’ living conditions sooner?”
The BBC News report on 22 April quoted, “Once hailed as the gold standard approach in fighting the virus, Singapore’s reputation now tarnished because of the infections spreading among the workers.”
Although Singapore has now sealed off multiple dormitories and is carrying out extensive testing with the migrant workers, BBC News said that questions are being raised about why the Government did not do more to protect them in the early stage.
The BBC News approached one of the migrant workers in Singapore who refused to be identified in the report, he noted that the migrant workers are living in fear as they are unsure of whether they are infected with the virus.
According to the migrant worker, one of his roommates and two other workers from the next room were tested positive for the virus.
“We’re all staying together and no one is doing anything about it. We’re all at risk,” he said.
When he was asked about the early measures that the Government could have taken before the infections emerged in the dormitories, he replied, “They should have isolated us, it is necessary and they could have done it sooner.”
Despite the increasing number of cases in the dormitories, the migrant worker expressed his gratitude as the number of fatalities for the COVID-19 disease in Singapore remains low. However, critics noted that the problem could have been avoided if the Government had acted sooner, according to the BBC News report.
The BBC News also interviewed Singapore’s Minister of Manpower, Josephine Teo, about why there was no action being taken from the Government in the early stage.
Ms Teo responded, “There are, in Southeast Asia alone, about 10 million migrant workers, a fraction of them in Singapore. We are not perfect, but we do what we can. Yes, we took some safe distancing measures within the dormitories and if we were to be able to rewind the clock, one could say that these safe distancing measures need to go much further.”
The BBC News further quoted in its report, “The pandemic has brought to the surface the flaws in Singapore society and it was the failure to address this crack that now threatens even their best-laid plans.”
Meanwhile, ABC News Australia reported on 22 April that experts said the surge in cases shows what can happen if the authorities become complacent.
ABC News interviewed Professor Dale Fisher, who is a professor of medicine at the National University of Singapore. He noted that regardless of how well prepared the Government is, they have to try and find the “blind spots” now.
According to the ABC News report, Prof Dale had been into the migrant workers’ dormitories with his colleagues to conduct testings with the workers and treat them. The migrant workers were seen physically distanced from one another as they were being advised on how to contain the virus.
“The community engagement is going to be critical, you need to be able to tell people how to protect themselves,” said Prof Dale.
ABC News also featured Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s televised address on 21 April, where he announced the “circuit breaker” period being extended to 1 June.
“I hope you understand that this short term pain is to stamp out the virus, protect the health and safety of our loved ones and allow us to revive our economy,” Mr Lee said in the video.
Following Mr Lee’s statement, ABC News continued to quote it with “A revival that will be watched for the world over, with many countries working to avoid a similar sudden spike.”

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

CGH offers apologies to patient who was "humiliated" by debt collectors engaged by the hospital

An audio recording of a 47-year-old male patient complaining to a staff…

“前老板要我物色外籍人士履历!” 前人资主管揭职场聘雇秘辛

“我的前老板曾“强烈建议”我注意外籍人士的求职履历!” 我国聘雇外籍人士课题一直备受争议,PMET职场聘雇上存在歧视现象,更不是空穴来风。不久前人力部也承认,有47个雇主招揽雇员竟没有公平对待新加坡人,甚至多达30家金融、专业服务企业,聘请的外籍PMET(专业人士、经理、行政人员和技术人员),大部分来自同一国家! 然而,以上现象都还可能只是冰山一角。 近日,在社交媒体领英(Linkedin),培训和咨询公司ConnectOne的总监Joanne Yeoh,针对聘雇外籍人士的课题发文,指出近年来被要求招聘外籍人士而倍感困扰。 她表示,“这是相当悲哀的时代,我国公民在自己的国家面临聘雇歧视,如今需敦促聘请本地人才能确保职场多元化。” Joanne说,尽管欢迎不同外籍人士和外国投资进入新加坡,但聘雇歧视确实存在在我国已有一段时日。 她也举例,过去十年期间她作为公司的人力资源部主管,也曾遇过类似的聘雇歧视的经验。 “我有遇过一些老板,“强烈推荐”我先查阅外国人的履历,即使我当时面试的本地人都符合职缺条件。” 倡议打造以新加坡人为核心团队 “当我坚持要在公司内建立以新加坡人为核心的PMET团队,我也曾被刻上不服从的标签;我也曾参加过某次接班人规划的评议,外籍董事当场表示,“若没有亚洲人能够领导,而且将会成为一场大灾难”(P/S:我当机立断,也放弃大笔花红就辞职。)”” 不仅如此,她也曾参与由印度籍员工的商务会议,全程以印度语交流,而她忆述,她却是全场唯一的新加坡人。…

PM Lee and Muhyiddin spoke on High Speed Rail project; further details will be announced in due course

In light of the 31 December deadline for the second and final…

李美花斥喂猫行动不妥 猫福协:不应被嘲笑

住宅区出现蟒蛇、老鼠越来越多的课题被带到国会议论,让网民直呼“难以接受”、“太离谱了”。议员针对喂猫人士的批评更引起猫福利协会的反驳,指爱护动物者和猫咪不应该被嘲笑,与人们共享社区的猫咪们不应面对被赶绝的威胁。 猫福利协会指出,喂猫人士每天都为猫咪们提供食物,且在需要时提供医药服务,且都是自掏腰包、自己抽出时间来做的。“因为猫咪们也和我们一样,猫咪也应该拥有安全的生活环境,并活得有尊严。” 国家公园局(修订)法案于本月12日三读通过,因此从4月1日起,除了食品,涉及植物和动物的相关事务,统一交由国家公园局负责管理。多名国会议员对有关的修订表示支持。 举例支持通过修订法案 李美花建议新成立的动物与兽医事务组(Animal and Veterinary Service)能够培训出一组专家,以便对付在住宅区等城市地区内出现的野生动物。她表示,野生动物的增加已“引起国民不安和恐慌”,甚至在野生动物出现时,不知道应该向哪一个机构求助。“每次警方被叫来处理蛇,我都感到很困惑。” 她指其选区内出现过蟒蛇,求救关爱动物协会(ACRES),但是对方不理会。“该蟒蛇当时出现在一名年长居民门前的排水沟内,她很担心,因为她的孙子在屋内睡觉。她曾求助关爱动物协会,但是关爱动物协会告诉她,排水沟是蛇生活的地方,所以他们不能采取行动。他们也告诉那位居民,那是一条蟒蛇,无毒的。虽然他们这么说没错,但是为那位居民想想吧,前面是蛇,后面是她那在睡觉的孙子,他该怎么做。” 李美花表示当她知道有关事项后,立刻通知市镇理事会派灭虫公司去抓蟒蛇。只是相关人员抵达现场时已经太迟了,蟒蛇不见了。 她随后表示,与动物共存没有错,但是必须取得平衡,居民的安全必须放在首要位置。 斥责喂猫人士“养大”老鼠…