IGI Airport, New Delhi, named after Indira Gandhi, a former Prime Minister of India, it is the busiest airport in India in terms of passenger traffic since 2009.

by Abhaya Srivastava
India’s nationwide coronavirus lockdown, the biggest in the world, which covers 1.3 billion people, will be extended until at least May 3, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said Tuesday.
The move comes despite complaints from millions of poor, a vast underclass who have been left almost completely without support as jobs have vanished and incomes dried up.
“From the economic angle, we have paid a big price,” Modi said. “But the lives of the people of India are far more valuable.”
“From the experiences of the last few days it is clear that the path we have chosen is correct.”
India’s current three-week-old lockdown, in force since March 25, had been scheduled to end at midnight Tuesday.
Modi said there would be “limited relaxations” from April 20 for districts with no cases, and new guidelines for industry and agriculture would be released on Wednesday.
The announcement comes as debate rages around the world on how to lift restrictions so that the economic carnage of the pandemic can be eased without a new spike in infections.
Official figures suggest South Asian nations have so far been relatively unscathed by the epidemic, with around 10,000 cases and 339 deaths in India.
Some experts say India has not conducted enough tests and that the true number of infections is much higher.
And with some of the most crowded cities on the planet, there are fears that numbers could take off and overwhelm the shaky healthcare system.
Several states including Maharashtra — home to Mumbai and with the highest number of cases — Tamil Nadu and Odisha have already announced lockdown extensions.

India’s poor

The shutdown, with strict limits on activity, has been devastating for the economy — and in particular for India’s poor.
Millions of daily wage labourers suddenly lost their jobs, forcing hundreds of thousands to travel hundreds of kilometres (miles) back to their home villages, often on foot.
Some died on the way, while others were shunned by locals when they made it back to their villages. One clip that went viral on social media showed a group of migrants being hosed down with chemicals by local officials.
Others have been stranded in cities in cramped, unsanitary conditions where the virus could spread quickly.
New Delhi alone is providing hundreds of thousands of free meals.

Snarl-ups

Farmers have complained of a lack of workers to harvest crops while snarl-ups of thousands of trucks not allowed to move because of the lockdown have hampered food transport.
“We have tried to keep the interests of the poor and the daily wage workers in mind while making these new guidelines,” Modi said in his 24-minute address.
“The central and state governments are working together to ensure that the farmers don’t face any problems.”
Reserve Bank of India governor Shaktikanta Das has called the coronavirus an “invisible assassin” that could wreak havoc on the economy.
A restaurant industry group, a sector that employs millions of people nationwide, warned Monday there could be “social unrest” if it did not receive financial relief.
The commerce ministry has also reportedly urged the government to consider opening more activities “with reasonable safeguards” even if the lockdown is extended.
Even before the pandemic, the Indian economy was stuttering, with the highest unemployment for decades.
Growth had slowed to about 5.0 percent before the pandemic and some analysts say it could slump to 1.5-2.0 percent this year — way below the level needed to provide jobs for the millions coming into the labour market each month.
– AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Does Singapore need a new approach to healthcare? Comparing SDP’s healthcare policy with 3M healthcare scheme

Much has been said about the affordable healthcare system in Singapore. In…

非议毕丹星声援亚菲言 陈有明反遭网民挞伐

裕廊集选区议员陈有明医生,在人民行动党官网发文,非议工人党秘书长毕丹星声援亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at),也翻旧账指亚菲言并非爱国的“友善批评者”,过去曾袒护马来西亚和马哈迪。孰不知此举反遭网民挞伐,并列举出选举局守则:候选人对待选举过程应负责任和庄严,避免以仇恨或诋毁对手的方式竞选。 毕丹星则转发了陈有明刊载在行动党官网的评论。只轻描淡写道“友爱批评者,也是新加坡的儿子。就如陈医生您和我一样,人非圣贤。” 事缘在6月5日,毕丹星参与“坚毅向前”预算案辩论,曾提及我们应庆幸友爱的批判者( loving critics)的存在;且政府也应意识到,民间的批评乃是因为他们关注议题。 相信毕丹星是响应去年巡回大使许通美教授,后者劝谕第四代领导班子,理应能欢迎和接纳异议分子的批评;也强调新加坡需要的不是阿谀奉承者(sycophants),而是友爱的批判者和乐于接受批评的人。 不过,陈有明则在评论中,翻出陈年旧账一一列举亚菲言过去的留言,也指后者尽管在新加坡成长,但是却嘲讽新加坡,也“受到马哈迪的吸引”,希望新加坡能像马来西亚一样。 亚菲言:也针对种族政治议题批评马国 孰不知陈有明借亚菲言抨击毕丹星的做法,却为亚菲言获得不少“同情票”。亚菲言则很遗憾自己把反对党“拉下水”,他表示很乐意和陈有明医生讨论有关新马关系、已故李光耀和马哈迪的观点。而亚菲言更多的是对爱国情操作出反思,也表示自己有时也会批评马国,例如写了一部剧控诉马国的种族政治。 也有网民则分享选举局的竞选指南,指竞选者都应保持负责任和庄严的态度,避免用仇恨或拉低对手等方式博宣传。也有者认为,先是许通美提出友善批评者的说法,陈有明应该先去与许通美辩论。 一些支持者也非议陈有明使用这种攻击对手的方式。…

ASEAN Governments reluctant to embrace region’s diverse civil society

~ By Dr James Gomez ~ Although civil society  engagement with ASEAN…