The government’s seemingly piecemeal dissemination of information and directives in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic has most definitely led to confusion on the part of the authorities as to how to police the new rules.
From what a F&B workers Mabel Ng wrote on her Facebook post, it would appear that essential workers are left with nowhere to have their lunch apart from the toilet!

She wrote, “Its now against the law to eat anywhere you could get caught and perhaps fined, putting all of us F and B frontliners in a tight spot when it comes to our lunch breaks.”
How is that fair?
They are out there risking their lives to provide an essential service and yet we are asking them to eat in the toilet? Why are the authorities enforcing government directives without the use of common sense?
Ng ended up having to eat her lunch in the toilet of another mall after being chased out by security when she was eating her lunch in front of her own stall!

She says that there has been some “blind implementation” of the rules. The rules are clearly to stop people from loitering unnecessarily and not to prevent people who are doing front line work from having their lunch!
This seemingly illogical means of enforcement could be in large part down to confusion as to what the rules actually entail leading authorities to err on the side of caution and throw logic to the wayside.
It is appalling and ridiculous that people who are working at essential jobs despite the outbreak of COVID-19 have nowhere to eat when we should be celebrating and praising them for their sacrifice!
This kind of policing sends out the wrong message and could end up bringing down the morale of those who still have to go out and work.
Yesterday, Ministry of Health clarified that Taxi drivers and food delivery riders can eat at public spaces or in their vehicles if it is not practical for them to head home for meals. That was days after the ban to dine in at eateries and hawker centres kicked in on the 7 April, with many stating that they did not know where to eat during their shifts. A photo showing a taxi driver eating from the back of his taxi, pained many Singaporeans who know how hard is it to drive for long hours especially now, where there is little to no customers to pick up.
To prevent further incidences of “brainless” enforcement, perhaps a government minister could speak out in praise of such essential workers and categorically state that these “no dining in” policies are meant for customers not workers!
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Facebook user reveals rudeness of Sitoh Yih Pin to workers while he was Potong Pasir MP

A Facebook user recently shared a story about Sitoh Yih Pin being…

More rights and work-life balance for workers in Singapore: DPP

Labour Day Message by Democratic Progressive Party  On this year’s Labour Day,…

寄信问事石沉大海 功能八号揶揄内政部“不舍得请”接函职员

公民组织功能八号氏族会(Function 8),揶揄内政部尽管在公共关系投入5千900万的预算,却似乎连一位专司接收群众电邮的职员,都不舍得请。 该会透露,早在今年7月10日,他们透过电邮和普通邮件,致函内政部,询问有关数名在《内安法令》下,被逮捕和驱逐处境的缅甸人详情。 功能八号在信函中指出,该会关注任何涉及《内安法》的逮捕事件,也会提呈报告给联合国人权理事会普遍定期审议(Universal Periodic Review)。 为了确保数据准确,希望当局能透露被逮捕人数、年龄等详情。信件寄出后,当局既没有回函,也没有回复确认是否已收到信。 功能八号仍不厌其烦,在8月5日再次透过电邮和发帖文给内政部长尚穆根,而且还把信件副本邮寄给他。再一次,又是没有任何确认和回应。 “2019年8月27日,我们再次发函提醒部长,但是时至今日,还是没有任何回应。” 该会抱怨,部长和他旗下的公职人员的行为,仍有不足之处,也很遗憾该部不回应公民的信函,他们的反馈单位似乎不懂得设定自动确认信函是否已收到。 该会不忘指出,内政部作为服务新加坡市民的公家机构,2019年财政预算,在公共关系方面获得的拨款高达5千900万元,但讽刺的是却连专司接收信函的职员,也不舍得请。 “作为新加坡公民,我们要怎样让这些部长和公务员对我们负责?难道他们骂不得?难道与普通市民互动的简单举动,也已经超出了他们的职责,或有失他们身份?”

马国扣两名柬国反对党成员 但随后撤销遣返指令

马来西亚当局周二(5日)趁两名柬埔寨反对党成员准备飞往泰国之际扣留了他们,马国人权委员会(SUHAKAM)目前正给予他们协助。人权组织直指马来西亚当局、越南、柬埔寨和泰国涉嫌拘留与遣返在联合国拥有政治难民身份的人。 据《路透社》报道,马国人权委员会的杰拉克佐瑟表示,两名柬埔寨人中,其中一名是寻求庇护者,周一就被拘留并于隔天被遣返回国,但后来两人上诉后,马国内政部与移民局撤销了遣返指令。 杰拉可佐瑟表示,“目前我们正在争取探望,确认两人状况,但我们对外交部选择不遣返的决定非常高兴,这是一个好兆头。” 而针对被拘留原因,杰拉可佐瑟则回应并不知情,《路透社》也表示,马国内政部、移民局和联合国难民事务高级专员办事处尚未作出回应,马国外交部也不予置评。 据《人权观察》亚洲部副主任罗伯森指出,两名受害者均为柬埔寨国家拯救党(CNPR)的成员,目前该党已被政府取缔。 维权团体国际特赦组织(Amnesty International)也表示遣返两人回国有违人权,并发声明呼吁即释放两名,确保两人不会被遣返柬埔寨。 《路透社》也表示,无法立即与柬埔寨当局联系。 仅仅是今年,柬埔寨已经逮捕至少48名反对党成员,并指他们计划要让柬埔寨救国党创办人沈良西(Sam Rainsy)回国,并推翻政府。