As a form of support for Singaporeans to power through the COVID-19 pandemic that led closures of businesses, the Government had set up a Temporary Relief Fund to aid people who need urgent financial assistance.
To increase the accessibility of the application for Temporary Relief Fund, the Government accepts a variety of supporting documents which include letters, e-mails, screenshots of a mobile app, WhatsApp messages, appointment booklets, handwritten notes as well as payment slips. However, certain people had been discovered to have “cheated the system” in order to receive the funds even when they clearly do not need the money as much as the people in need.
Minister of Social & Family Development, Desmond Lee shared about this incident onto his Facebook, condemning the people who took advantage of the Government’s aid while many more Singaporeans urgently need the aid to stay alive.
Mr Lee stated that more than 100,000 Singaporeans who have been severely affected by COVID-19 had applied for the Temporary Relief Fund, and the volunteers for SSO and People’s Association had been working hard to process and disburse the funds as quickly as possible.
Despite their efforts in helping other Singaporeans, Mr Lee said that he had received certain screenshots of how a small number of Singaporeans lied just to receive the funds. Mr Lee explained that these people did not really “cheat the Government”, but what they were really doing was taking advantage at the expense of many Singaporeans who are experiencing a genuine crisis.

Expressing how disheartened he and his colleagues felt upon such despicable actions, Mr Lee stated that he had sent these reports of abuse to Minister Shanmugam.

“Yet, many people have sent me screenshots such as this, which suggest that a very small number of people are taking advantage of the schemes, or encouraging others who do not need help to try to “cheat” the system. No, you are not cheating just the government. You are doing this at the expense of many Singaporeans who are in genuine crisis, and need this help. Those who’ve written to me about such abuse are rightly indignant. And my colleagues and I are also disheartened.”

He had also made it clear that the Government’s priority at the moment would be to disburse the funds as well as to improve the way they provide assistance to help the affected people and vulnerable communities.

“But our priority now is to disburse the TRF, the COVID-19 Support Grant and provide other help schemes. We need to focus on improving the way we provide assistance, to help affected people and vulnerable communities.”

Having that said, people left comments under the post saying that they still had not gotten any response for their applications.
MuhdEEE Shalihin commented that he had applied for the Temporary Relief Fund since last Thursday (2 April) and he still had not received anything. Working as a GrabFood rider and being the sole earner in his family, he expressed that during this difficult situation he could only pray for better days to come.
Mechelle ZJ Luo-Sng pleaded Mr Lee for help by stating that her father and brother were severely impacted at work due to COVID-19 and she mentioned that Tampines Hub Community Centre rejected them. She felt the irony when people in need could not receive the aid while others who didn’t need the money managed to get the fund.
NZ Remy commented that the people who really need the aid could not receive the money urgently and that she is still waiting for hers. Mr Desmond Lee replied under her comment to ask her to send him a personal message. It turns out that Ms Remy had already requested help on Saturday (4 April) and it seems like Mr Lee did not respond to her.
In light of the impact COVID-19 had caused unto businesses, employers were found to be unkind towards their employees and many people lost their jobs during such a difficult period of time.
Jess Chua said that her mother had been retrenched at a food court as a drinks assistant, and thus Ms Chua wanted to help her mother to apply for the Fund. However, after getting in touch with her mother’s supervisor to request a retrenchment letter, the supervisor responded that the letter is not needed to apply for the Fund. Ms Chua stated that abuse of the Fund will persist if no official document is required for the application.

Here are a few more people who expressed difficulties in the process of application for Fund:
Candice Lau stated that she and her husband had applied for the Fund at the Serangoon Community Club on 2 April but they have still yet to receive a response. She also mentioned that some of her family and friends who applied after she did had already gotten their aid.
Since the Temporary Relief Fund is to support the people who had lost their job or a 30 per cent drop in their income, Zulkifli Adawiyah commented that he provided documented proof for his 40 per cent salary drop. However, his application still got rejected.
Mohamed Faizal stated that his company had to shut down and leave him unemployed. Mr Faizal applied for the Fund at Pasir Ris East Community Club on the first day and he still hasn’t gotten any response so far.
Nadya Salyriana expressed that she had encountered so much problem just to justify her application, and she felt the unfairness when someone without documented proof could apply for the Fund easily. Ms Nadya also questioned if different officers have different ways of screening.
Ms קרולין הודית described that she queued for one hour at Yishun Social Service Office and was then directed to Community Club instead. She submitted her application with documented proof after queuing for another three hours at the Community Club, yet her application is still under consideration. Expressing her confusion upon seeing how others could apply so easily without documents, she wondered if they applied for the same Fund.

Although the Government intended to make the application process easier for Singaporeans, employers were found to be unhelpful by refusing to provide help for their employees. During tough times like this, not only that employers’ abuse was being magnified, but also the selfish people who encourage taking advantage of the Temporary Relief Fund.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

公积金和公共组屋的计时炸弹

人民之声党成员毕博渊(Brad Bowyer),将我国中央公积金制度,和德国及丹麦的养老金制度作比较。 他指出,德国的养老金基金总额达到2千680亿美元,虽然略低于我国,但该国有8千240万人口,其中25巴仙超过65岁。 “虽然人民平均的储蓄缴交率只有18.7巴仙(而且还是雇员和雇主对半),德国养老金仍能至少给出1千175欧元(约1800新元)的入息。” 毕博渊质疑,何以比我国规模稍小的德国养老基金,却能回报给更多会员们5-6倍的回酬? 至于丹麦人口有575万,和新加坡差不多。不过他们的养老基金只有1千600亿美元。当地雇员一方面缴税,也要缴交平均12巴仙的养老金。但是退休雇员至少可以领回每月4千元的入息。 《财经时报》前总编提醒部分公积金转到房产上 毕博渊的观点一出,也引来正反双方网民积极参与辩论。有者感谢毕博渊道出了我国公积金制度的不足,不过《财经时报》(Business Times)前总编Mano Sabnani则提醒,公积金的终身入息只是一小部分,事实上,公积金的储蓄很大部分也倍转换成房地产–被用来买房子。 Sabnani指出,公积金会员在55岁可以提出最低储蓄额以外的钱,但是如果会员还有买房子,那么留在公积金里的储蓄就更少,如果如此可以领取的终身入息也不会很多。 他也提及,也有一些低收入劳工或家庭主妇的公积金积蓄也相对较低。他不认同把我国公积金和德国、丹麦养老金一概而论,因为他们把所有储蓄都放在退休金里,而不是像我国国民需要用在房屋、健保储蓄等用途,自然退休后领取的入息就较高。…

NTU student jailed 18 weeks for filming upskirt videos, claims stress and “addiction” to bare bottom as the reason

A Nanyang Technological University (NTU) undergraduate who claimed to be in severe…

【冠状病毒19】李亚妹安老院86岁老妇逝世 4月10日增198确诊

昨日(10日)卫生部证实,再有一名来自李亚妹安老院的确诊86岁本地女公民,不敌病魔逝世。 根据资料,该名老妇是在本月1日被送往国家传染病中心,同日确诊。她是第987例病例,在本月9日因并发症逝世。 她也是来自李亚妹安老院第二位病逝的确诊病患。早前在本月3日,该安老院一名86岁确诊老妇逝世。同时,本地累计死亡病例已达到七起。 本月10日本地新增多达198例确诊病例,累计确诊已达到2千108例。而昨日没有入境病例,都是本地确诊病例,其中有79例都和客工宿舍感染群有关联。 同时,有两名来自陈笃生医院的女医生,和一名在后港综合诊所任职的病患服务人员确诊,年龄分别26至35岁。 而本地新增三感染群,分别是双溪加株道 (Sungei Kadut Ave)31号的客工宿舍(14例)、 移民与关卡局大厦(五例)和国大医院的一个装修工地(四例)。 本地昨日再有32例病患治愈出院,累计治愈出院492例。不过,多达875例仍留院治疗,大多情况稳定或有起色。其中32病重病患需待在加护病房。至于734例康复良好惟冠毒测试仍呈阳性反应的病患,则转移到本地的社区隔离设施。

Singaporeans invited to clap for frontliners tonight at 8pm to show appreciation

In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the people in the frontlines have…