On 5 April (Sunday), the Government gazetted two dormitories in Singapore as isolation areas after a spike in COVID-19 cases were reported among migrant workers who stayed at the dorms.
The dorms – S11 Dormitory @ Punggol and Westlite Toh Guan dormitory – were placed in a complete lockdown in order to prevent the spread of the deadly coronavirus.
Just a day later (6 April), Toh Guan dormitory, which neighbours Westlite, was also gazetted by the Government as the third isolation area.
National Development Minister Lawrence Wong told the media that the decision to gazette the dormitories was part of two separate strategies for tackling local transmission, each for dormitories and the community at large.
“Once the circuit breaker (measures) kicks in, all foreign workers, on top of (those in) isolation areas, will have to stay in dormitories and will not be able to come out, so there is no infection to the rest of the community,” he said.
However, just a day after the announcement was made, media reports highlighted the unsanitary and crowded living condition at the dorms where kitchens are infested with cockroaches, toilets are overflowing, and rubbish bins are flooded with garbage.
Following this, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) released a statement on Monday (6 April) to highlight the efforts that the Ministry has made in ensuring the needs and well-being of migrant workers at the dorms are being well taken care of.
In the statement, MOM said : “MOM officers have also been working round-the-clock with the two dormitory operators and partners to prioritise the well-being of workers who remain healthy,” adding that this includes ensuring a timely supply of food and increasing hygiene management now that workers have to stay in the dorms all day.
Additionally, it also said all meals will be supplied to these workers by using the service of professional caterers instead of allowing the workers to cook in the dormitories’ kitchens. This is done to ensure their safety and “minimise the risk of unknown transmissions through gathering at the common kitchens”.
MOM also mentioned that although it faced “teething problems with the portion, suitability and distribution” of the food, but stated that these issues have “progressively resolved”.
“MOM has engaged multiple professional caterers to ensure that dormitory residents are receiving three proper meals a day. To date, the caterers have delivered over 65,000 portion of food and snacks,” MOM said.
It added, “The caterers are also continuously adjusting their menu to cater to the dietary preferences of the residents. Our officers are working with the dormitory operators and caterers to further streamline the food distribution process to ensure that residents get their meals in a timely manner.”
However, it appears that the current reality at these dorms are far-fetched from what MOM stated.

Bad and insufficient portion of food

In MOM’s press statement, it also accompanied pictures of meals catered to the workers at Westlife Toh Guan Dormitory, showing a sizeable portion of rice with curry and two side dishes.

Meals that MOM said are being offered to workers
Unfortunately, these migrant workers have refuted that such meals were supplied to them.
Based on images that TOC received this morning, it was said that workers at Westlite Toh Guan dormitory received a small container of unappetising fried rice for breakfast, while those at Toh Guan Dormitory got just a slice of plain white bread with another item which looks like a spring roll.
Fried rice at Toh Guan Dormitory
Breakfast at Westlite Toh Guan dormitory
This is obviously nothing close to what MOM said the workers would receive.
If that’s not all, TOC also understands that employers are not allowed to send food to these workers who are housed in the dormitories.
An employer, who has more than 50 workers living at the dorm, told TOC that he was disallowed from passing food which was requested by his workers as they said that the food portion was too little for them.
Additionally, another image sent to TOC was taken at Toh Guan Dormitory for today’s lunch, where they received just plain white rice with a small piece of fried fish and some okra.
Lunch at Toh Guan Dormitory
The workers told us that the food was tasteless and the vegetable was old and extremely hard to bite through.
Separately, some workers whom spoke to TOC told us that the vegetables given for last night’s dinner tasted spoilt.
If that’s not bad enough, a number of workers even said that they were forced to buy food from the canteen if they remain hungry.
As such, this shows that what MOM said on the kind of meals that are delivered to the workers at the dorms is not exactly what’s happening on the ground.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

我国工作和生活“不”平衡 五分一全职者周工时逾48小时

官方论述一直以来,强调要达到工作与生活平衡,但是在一项最新的国际排名中,我国在该指数上,既然排位在40个城市中的第32位,而且我国人民花在工作上的时间竟然是世界城市中最长之一。尤其在全职员工方面,有23巴仙的人每周工作时长更超过48小时。 在40个城市中,芬兰首都赫尔辛基以满分夺得冠军,被视为工作与生活最平衡的城市;德国慕尼黑和挪威首都奥斯陆分别夺得第二和第三名。在40个城市中,慕尼黑的城市中压力最低。 我国总得分为36.36,位居倒数第八名,但是仍然比排位在第35的香港、第39名的东京和“包尾”的吉隆坡来的好。 依据三大组成部分评分 这项报告是由科技公司Kisi结合国际组织、各国的政府机构及私人企业,如环球旅游网亿客行(Expedia)和瑞士银行(UBS)的数据总结所得。 该组织依据三大组成部分,即劳作的强度(Work Intensity)、社会与设施的完善、以及城市宜居与否的20个因素,得出各项目的得分。劳作强度来自于抵达公司的时间、每周工时、周工时超过48小时的比率、失业率、最低年假天数等。 而社会及设施的完善涵盖了社会开支、医疗照顾、精神医疗照顾的方便度以及性别平等等;城市宜居程度则概括了城市的安全程度、垮了指数、城市压力、户外空间是否充足、空气污染指数等。 有关报告显示了我国在“工过度”项目中紧贴在每周工作小时为46小时吉隆坡之后,以44.6小时位居第二。 然而,全职员工工作时长方面,我国有23巴仙的全职员工每周工作超过48小时,成为40个城市中的第一,吉隆坡以22巴仙位居第二,而香港和东京都以20巴仙排在第三。 然而,在由世界快乐报告(World Happiness…

Former President of UN Security Council Kishore Mahbubani called out Trump Administration for being 'unwise' with regards to Taiwan

“The most dangerous issue in US-China relations is Taiwan,” according to previous…

越南外交部:对李显龙言论未客观反映史实感遗憾

除了柬埔寨国防部长和议员要求我国总理李显龙,针对此前指指越南在1979年“入侵柬埔寨”言论作出更正,越南外交部发言人也在昨日表态,对李显龙的言论未客观反映史实而表达遗憾。 根据越南越通社报导,越南外交部发言人黎氏秋姮接受当地媒体询问时,表示李显龙的讲话内容中认为越南已“侵略”,“侵占”柬埔寨。黎氏秋姮对此强调,越南对未客观地反映历史事实、对舆论造成不良影响的部分讲话内容感到遗憾。 她表示越南外交部已和新加坡外交部,就此问题进行磋商。 她指出,越南在终结柬埔寨红高棉政权种族灭绝,作出的贡献和牺牲受到广泛认可。 李显龙是在5月31日,于个人脸书专页发文哀悼泰国前首相布勒姆的逝世。其中提及布勒姆当年曾反对“越南入侵柬埔寨”,且不承认取代红高棉的柬埔寨政府。此外,在香格里拉对话会的开幕晚宴上致词时,也曾提及越南入侵柬埔寨一说。 2018年11月16日,由联合国资助的柬埔寨法院特别法庭(ECCC)判决,前红色高棉意识形态主管农谢(92岁)和前政府总理乔森潘(87岁)被裁定犯有大屠杀罪,双双被判无期徒刑。 该判决反映了历史事实,为受害者讨回公道,并受到联合国和国际社会的欢迎。 发言人也指出,东盟取得的成就,乃是所有成员国共同努力的成果,各国都应意识到需在相互尊重和共同原则的基础上,加强东盟间团结的重要性。 至于柬埔寨国防部长狄班,是在周一接受媒体访问时,表示已要求黄永宏告知李总理,对其言论作出更正。 “他(李显龙)的言论是不实、未反映史实的,说越南军队入侵柬埔寨完全不对,我们请他作出更正。”他表示,他们至今仍认为当年越南志愿部队是来到柬埔寨解救百姓的性命,对该国有显著意义。 柬评论抨击“不尊重红高棉受害者” 另一方面,在本周一柬埔寨英语媒体《高棉时报》,也刊载一篇措辞强烈的评论《李显龙不尊重红高棉受害者》。…