Parkroyal on Pickering Hotel at Pickering Street in Chinatown. Source: Danisha Hakeem/TOC

Over 7,500 hotel rooms in Singapore have been booked by the Government to accommodate residents who have been served the mandatory 14-day Stay-Home Notices (SHNs).

Branding the move “a massive response” to the spike in confirmed COVID-19 cases in Singapore, property portal 99.co noted that the booking was placed through the Singapore Tourism Board as a part of “a swift and organised whole-of-government approach to contain the spread of Covid-19 in our community”.

Bloomberg on Sat (28 Mar) reported the government as saying last week that it will assign Singapore residents returning from the United Kingdom and the United States to hotels to serve their SHNs in order to avoid the risk of transmitting the virus to their family members at home.

The said residents will be placed in the following hotels, most of them located in Central Singapore:

Source: 99.co

Those serving their SHNs in the above hotels, however, are not allowed to leave their rooms throughout the 14-day period and are not permitted to use shared hotel facilities such as the gym and swimming pool.

A 21-year-old law student serving her SHN at Shangri-La’s Rasa Sentosa Resort and Spa told Bloomberg that she was “impressed” by how the Singapore government treats Singaporean students returning from abroad.

“My friends said their governments are not really trying very hard to get them back home, but ours did and they put us up in hotels,” said Chelsie Lee, referring to her friends from Hong Kong and China who are struggling to secure flights back home or spending extra money to change their flight itineraries.

Several commenters similarly lauded the Government’s move to place the returning residents in hotels, given that hotels are able to house those serving SHNs away from the rest of the population in Singapore without sacrificing the comfort of those having to serve their notice.

Furthermore, placing residents in such hotels will enable the Government to easily monitor any breaches of the SHNs, given the extensive network of surveillance by CCTVs and security personnel in said hotels, in addition to a complete range of highly-trained hotel staff.

While Bloomberg reported that the stay of those serving SHNs in the above hotels will be funded by “taxpayer dollars”, one commenter said that their stay is actually “chargeable” and that the Government is “not fully footing the bill for them”.

The hotels mentioned will also benefit from the increased occupancy as a result of the Government’s booking for those serving SHNs, particularly in the wake of the huge dip in the tourism industry as a result of the COVID-19 epidemic.

A couple of commenters questioned the Government’s criteria in allocating accommodation for those required to serve SHNs, asking why certain people are given the opportunity to be isolated in such hotels while others are asked to stay in their own homes.

Last month, it was reported that those who were made to serve a Quarantine Order were housed in the Heritage Chalet located along Pasir Ris Road.

A number of foreign workers, particularly those from across the Causeway — living in Johor Bahru but who are unable to re-enter the country for the time being due to Malaysia’s movement control order (MCO) — are placed in budget hotels such as Hotel 88.

Workers whose employers did not secure the necessary accommodation for them were forced to resort to sleeping at Kranji MRT station, as reported by TODAY on 19 Mar.

Manpower Minister Josephine Teo announced on 17 Mar that over 10,000 Malaysian workers have managed to secure accommodation in Singapore, as a result of the Ministry of Manpower (MOM)’s collaborative efforts with “tripartite partners to support the affected companies” in finding suitable temporary lodgings for their workers.

However, she also noted that around 100,000 Malaysians working in Singapore did not have confirmed living arrangements in Singapore as 17 Mar.

“It may take some time because employers and workers have preferences, and different budgets, so we need time to match them,” said Mrs Teo.

Following the Malaysian government’s decision to extend the MCO, however, MOM on Wed (25 Mar) said that it “will not be extending the temporary housing support” beyond 31 Mar 2020.

“For their own long-term sustainability and business continuity reasons, employers will need to decide on how best to house their affected workers in Singapore, and the sharing of additional costs with their workers,” said the Ministry in a statement.

MOM explained that it has been helping to facilitate the process of securing accommodation for the affected workers alongside the Ministry of National Development, the Housing Development Board, the Ministry of Trade and Industry, and the Singapore Tourism Board for the past week.

“MOM will now embark on the next phase, which is to work with employers to facilitate the transfer of their affected workers into more sustainable housing options in Singapore,” the Ministry added.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

CPF Board: Those aged 50+ but not in Merdeka or Pioneer Gen also get something from Govt

CPF Board sent emails to the CPF members, highlighting some of the…

【冠状病毒19】4月26日本地新增931起确诊

根据卫生部文告,截至本月26日中午12时,本地新增931例冠状病毒19确诊病例,其中大部分为住客工宿舍的工作准证持有者。其中15例为本地公民或永久居民。 本地累计确诊病例1万3624例。当局仍在搜集病例细节,并将在晚间公布。

Desperate call for action by cat feeders of Beach Road

A website, savebeachroadcats.com (SBRC) is being set up by cat feeders at Beach Road to chronicle…

过去五年 四成上班族曾遭性骚扰!仅30%受害者举报

调查发现,每五名受访者中,就有两人曾在过去五年内遭受到职场性骚扰!然而,愿意举报者仅30%,情况令人忧心。 本地妇女行动及研究协会(AWARE),偕同国际调查机构益普索(Ipsos)于去年11月,向1千名本地公民和永久居民展开调查,亦是本地首个探讨职场性骚扰的全国调查。 调查发现,多达四成上班族在过去五年,曾在职场遭受性骚扰,但只有30%受害者会正式举报。 值得关注的是,受访者对于职场性骚扰的界定不清楚,其中包括收到含有性别歧视或色情意味的图像、笑话或文字;发表针对受害者样貌、身材或性行为冒犯性言论,以及不必要的肢体接触等。 而在意识到自己是受害者的人当中,有一半人最初并不认为自己曾是受害者,直到调查人员描述了特定的性骚扰情形,他们才恍然大悟。 仅三成受害者会举报 至于是否会举报性骚扰行为,仅三成的受访者表示,会向公司通报职场性骚扰,而选择不通报的受访者,则因各种理由拒绝,如希望淡忘事件、认为遭受的职场性骚扰不算严重,以及缺乏证据。 有五分之二的举报案件,加害者最终被调职或解雇;但在五分之一的案件中,尽管有骚扰的证据,但加害者没有遭受任何处罚。 AWARE倡导与研究主管莎莉·辛戈兰(Shailey Hingorani)指出,该调查凸显了本地职场性骚扰普遍且急需处理的问题。 尽管我国在处理性暴力优于其他国家,但在处理职场性骚扰上,却似乎落后于其他专门立法的国家,辛戈兰表示。 建议立法禁职场骚扰…