PA Kopi Talk at ITE College Central (Image source: PM Lee Hsien Loong Official Facebook)

Last Saturday (14 March), Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong took to his Facebook page, raising the concern of whether to hope for the Covid-19 crisis to stabilise and hold the General Election (GE) by 21 April 2021, or call the elections early.

In his Facebook post, PM Lee, who seems undecided on the GE’s date, wrote that the date will depend on “the situation, and the outlook”.

“Singapore faces grave and extended challenges. We can’t tell when the pandemic will end, but it will likely last at least this year, and quite possibly longer. The economic hit will likely be more serious than the Global Financial Crisis, and longer-lasting too, even beyond the end of the pandemic,” he wrote.

Noting that the situation will worsen before getting better, PM Lee stated in his post,

“We have two choices. Either hope and pray that things will stabilise before the end of the term so that we can hold elections under more normal circumstances – but we have no certainty of that.

Or else call elections early, knowing that we are going into a hurricane, to elect a new government with a fresh mandate and a full term ahead of it, which can work with Singaporeans on the critical tasks at hand.”

PM Lee affirmed that the necessary precautions will be in place to make sure the “parties can campaign effectively and people can vote safely” if the GE were to take place in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic.

In the meantime, the sudden announcement of the boundaries revision by the Election Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) has incited the opposition parties to call out the government for its irresponsible decision to hold the GE during the Covid-19 outbreak as it is important to focus on fighting the Covid-19 outbreak and protecting public health at this current period.

Netizens disagree to holding GE as the priority should be to combat Covid-19

Commenting under PM Lee’s Facebook post, many netizens disagreed with the idea of holding the GE amid the Covid-19 outbreak, noting that the government should save the national reserves and resources to combat the Covid-19 instead of channelling funds and energy towards elections. Compare with holding a GE, the priority should be focusing on tackling the spread of Covid-19.

One netizen mocked that the government is not capable of dealing with the crisis which is why it is so urgent for the ruling government to hold the GE in the middle of a ‘hurricane’ due to Covid-19. The netizen wrote, “What’s the urgency, unless you think the current team which 70% of the electorate chose, is inadequate to deal with the crisis?”

A few netizens also reminded the government that it should prioritise public health and the safety of people, and not the upcoming elections. All parties should work together and be united to overcome the coronavirus crisis, they said.

The other citizens also called on the government to put aside politics and to fight against the Covid-19 outbreak together as the competence of government will be seen through the process of dealing with the country’s current crisis.

 

 

 

One netizen cited her own experience when having a door-to-door visit from a Member of Parliament (MP), but she did not dare to open the door as she cared about her family health due to the fear of being infected with the coronavirus. She requested the government to take into consideration the unforeseen threat of coronavirus before changing the date of the GE.

Some citizens condemned that it would be irresponsible and immoral to put the nation’s safety at risk if the government decides to hold the GE during this period, adding that the GE will create higher human flow which could cause a higher transmission rate of Covid-19 among the public.

One netizen also doubted what PM Lee affirmed in his post, asking how the government plans on implementing precautionary measures to ensure a safe environment during the election period.

However, there are still some netizens who expressed their support for holding the GE as soon as possible, which they say could help the people and country to have more certainty in coping with the coronavirus outbreak.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

WP Leon Perera reassures PAP supporter that the party will “serve all residents equally”

Workers’ Party’s (WP) Leon Perera took to his Facebook on Sunday (26…

被控无准证办集会、拒签口供有罪 高庭驳回范国瀚上诉

社运份子范国瀚因无准证举办集会、拒签署口供,合共被罚款3200元,不服判决于日前(10月4日)向高庭提出上诉。惟今日被高庭裁决驳回上诉。 根据书面判词,高庭法官蔡利民驳回范国瀚辩护律师杜莱辛甘的辩述。后者指当时范所举办的“公民抗命及社会运动”论坛,只不过是“讨论”和“分享有关公民不服从的观点和经历”。 范国瀚在2016年11月26日,在新民巷美景城(Midview City)的AGORA,主办“公民抗命及社会运动”论坛,邀请香港“黄雨伞运动”中的学运领袖黄之锋,透过Skype与现场观众连线对谈交流。 法官指出,控方展示范国瀚有意透过上述活动,认可“透过公民不服从带来社会改革”,这属于“集会”的范畴。 “依我之见,如讨论涉及捍卫/主张某一立场、宗旨或运动,也形同在宣扬相关志业。” 尽管论坛的主题相对中立,惟法官也指出在脸书对有关活动的简介,可见其“并非纯粹中立的学术讨论”。有关简介指将邀请香港众志秘书长黄之锋,与本地社运分子施兰以及韩俐颖,分享公民不服从和民主,在营造促进进步和改变的社会运动扮演的角色。 法官认为,有鉴于黄之锋的身份,范国瀚邀请对付参与讨论,就显示范认同透过公民不服从带来社会改革的志业。 至于范国瀚被指拒签口供,法官指出警方有法律权力,要求供证者签署口供,以保障口供的可靠性。 控方曾要求调高保释金至1万5000元 法院是在今年1月3日裁定,范国瀚被指无准证举办集会,且拒绝签署口供,被判有罪。他因无准证办集会被罚2000元或10日监禁,而拒绝签口供被罚1200元或6日监禁。 据功能八号氏族会总监张素兰在脸书分享,控方曾要求提高保释金至1万5000元,所幸范国瀚辩护律师回应,范没有潜逃的风险,也真诚地出庭,法庭也驳回了控方的要求。…

Singapore to soon implement standardised packaging for tobacco products

Soon, all tobacco products, including cigarettes, sold in Singapore will come in…

Suspected upskirt pervert caught by public in Toa Payoh

In what is becoming a common occurrence, a man suspected of taking…