It appears that the first confirmed cased of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has been traced back to a 55-year-old from Hubei province on 17 November 2019, according to data from the Chinese government that the South China Morning Post (SCMP) has seen. However, it was also noted that this patient might not be the first to contract the virus.

In a report today (13 March), SCMP noted that at least 266 people were identified so far as being infected last year, all of whom were placed under medical surveillance by Chinese authorities. Some of these cases might have been backdated after specimens taken from these suspected cases were later tested by health authorities, said SCMP.

The article explained that interviews with whistle-blowers from the medical community suggest that doctors in China only realised they were facing a new virus later in December.

Before the outbreak become an international health crisis, scientists had already started trying to map the pattern of transmission from early on when the epidemic was reported in the city of Wuhan in January.

A better understanding of how the virus is transmitted and how undetected and undocumented cases might contribute to the spread will help scientists get a better idea of how big a threat this really is.

From the day of the first case on 17 November, between one to five new cases were reported daily. After a month, the total number of infections were 27. But by 20 December, the total number of confirmed cases soared to 60.

Following this, a doctor from Hubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Zhan Jixian, informed local health authorities that the disease was in fact a new coronavirus. By then, over 180 people had been infected, though not all were identified by healthcare professionals at the time.

By the end of 2019, there were 266 cases. The next day, on 1 January 2020, the number of cases reached 381.

SCMP noted that while government records haven’t been made public, they do provide clues about the spread of the virus in the early stages and how many confirmed cases were recorded.

Who is patient zero?

Right now, scientists are looking into who might be the first patient, patient zero, so that they can trace the source of the virus. Scientists believe that the virus might have jumped from a wild animal, possibly a bat, to patient zero.

So far, none of the first nine patients reported to have the virus in November 2019 have been confirmed as being patient zero. The four men and five women were aged between 39 and 79. Unfortunately, it is unknown if they were residents of Wuhan, which has been identified as the epicentre of the outbreak.

SCMP noted that there might have been cases dating back even further.

According to the World Health Organistion (WHO), the first case of COVID-19 was confirmed in China on 8 December. However, the organisation doesn’t track the spread of the disease on its own, relying instead on the information provided by each country.

On the other hand, an article in the medical journal The Lancet identifies the first known infection date as 1 December. This was a report by Chinese doctors from Jinyintan Hospital in Wuhan.

Alternatively, the first known whistle-blower in this crisis, Dr Ai Fen told People magazine that tests revealed a patient at Wuhan Central Hospital had contracted an unknown coronavirus on 16 December. This interview was later censored.

SCMP points out that reports from other doctors in Wuhan suggest that they were aware of the disease in late December.

Doctors asked to hold back on revealing information

Previous reports noted that while doctors in Wuhan collected samples from suspected cases in later December, they were unable to confirm their findings. This was because they were bogged down by bureaucracy including having to secure approval from the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, which would take days.

They were also instructed not to reveal anything to the public about the new disease.

Even as late as 11 January, Wuhan’s health authorities still claimed that there were only 41 confirmed cases.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Educate cyber citizens??

We must adapt ourselves to it, and use it to educate and…

学者质询吉宝岸外贿赂案进展 维护调查完整性当局不便置评

本地学者沙塔尔(Sattar Bawany)教授,投稿英语媒体《今日报》,质询政府公开有关新加坡吉宝岸外与海事公司(Singapore’s Keppel Offshore)贿赂丑闻的调查。 2018年,时任律政部兼财政部高级政务部长的英兰妮,曾表示我国总检察署和贪污调查局已着手调查。但碍于贿赂行为发生在2001年、证据和证人也散布海外多国,当局只能“尽可能迅速行动”。 从英兰妮在国会的答复,距今已有三年之久,似乎仍不见有任何更新消息。“遗憾的是,此案玷污了建国总理李光耀等先贤建立的低贪腐的声誉,拉低我们的国际贪污感知指数。” 沙塔尔认为,此案也显示有必要加强打击贪腐的法律,更好地阻止海外贪污行为。 贪污调查局不便置评 不过,根据贪污调查局透过企业关系助理总监Shawn Chew在昨日(27日)发文回应,指出尽管理解学者的关注,不过为了保护调查的完整,当局仍不便发表评论或更新调查进展。 调查本质上是机密的,这么做也是为了避免影响将来可能进行的提控。 贪污调查局也声称,本地的贪腐情况仍受稳定控制,过去五年当局收到的贪腐犯罪行为举报也有减少趋势。当局也重申续坚决打击贪腐且毫不犹豫将犯罪者绳之以法。…

Amateurs – and loving it

By Joshua Chiang am·a·teur (m-tûr, -tr, -chr, -chr, -tyr) A person who engages…

【选举】无惧市镇会诉讼影响 毕丹星:工人党表现选民有目共睹

工人党秘书长毕丹星表示,阿裕尼-后港的居民对于工人党的贡献有目共睹,并将在来临大选作出选择。 受询及阿裕尼-后港市镇会诉讼案,是否会对此次选情造成影响,毕丹星于今日(26日)在线上记者会表示,2015年至今,阿裕尼-后港市镇会的表现,未造成引起居民忧虑的问题,将市镇会的财务表现拿出来,是可以和新加坡其他集选区相比的。 因此对他而言,重新评估市镇会成员的表现更为关键。根据他的观察,不论是居民和阿裕尼-后港市镇会,都在工人党选区做得很好。 与此同时,他也证实工人党主席林瑞莲、原议员费沙、贝理安、严燕松将继续留守阿裕尼集选区。