“You don’t get to lecture us on putting common good ahead of self-interest,” said Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan to the ruling government yesterday (8 March) on his Facebook page.

In a post, Dr Chee listed out the many instances that illustrate how the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) government says one thing but does another and how there is a difference in the standards they set for themselves compared to those for the people.

Starting with salaries, Dr Chee notes:

“When PAP tells us that its ministers – the highest paid politicians in the world – are still not paid enough and then refuse to implement minimum wage for workers.

When the PM pays himself $200k a month but tells the people to buy the cheapest brand of milk powder or eat $3-economic rice.”

In the same vein, he highlighted how ministers “make us” live in crammed housing while insisting on increasing the population to 6.9 or even 10 million while they themselves live in massive bungalows.

On bread and butter issues, Dr Chee noted:

“When PAP withholds CPF funds and makes our elderly toil for a living when retired ministers enjoy a Swiss standard of living.

When it promised us that HDB prices would never fall when there was absolutely no truth to it.

When PAP widens the divide between elite schools and neighbourhood schools while saying that every school is a good school and ministers attend or send their children to attend prestigious universities overseas.”

He also touched on financial matters, saying that the PAP “continues its profligacy and financial imprudence when it comes to spending public funds and then raises the GST” and noted that the country’s economy is ranked 4th on the Crony-Capitalism Index while the government refuses to reveal the amount in the country’s reserves.

On legislation and politics, Dr Chee said:

“When it introduces legislation that allows ministers to accuse the opposition of making false statements while the opposition cannot do the same to ministers.

When it reserves the presidency for a Malay and then allows its ethnically-Indian candidate to run.

When it appoints its losing candidate as chair and adviser to govt grassroots organisations instead of the duly elected opposition MP.”

He also added, “When it [the government] says that society would lose out without a natural aristocracy and that it would allow more billionaires to come in even if it worsens inequality in this country.”

Finally, on jobs, Dr Chee said that the PAP continues to import more and more foreign professionals, managers, executives, and technicians (PMETS) while many Singaporeans have to resort to becoming Grab or taxi drivers to make a living.

Netizens call for a change; some disagree with the implementation of a minimum wage

Dr Chee’s post has garnered over 300 comments and been shared at least 600 times since it was published.

A majority of comments are netizens agreeing with Dr Chee’s sentiments, pointing out the “elitist” situation of the ruling government. One person noted the 69.9 percent of voters who voted in the PAP government in the last general election, and asked how they could be “oblivious” to the “hypocrisy” being exhibited.

Many pointed out that the leaders have fallen short of their responsibilities in caring for the well-being of the people, adding their own list of the government’s actions, and called for the ruling government to be voted out.

Richard Lim also suggested that the ruling party’s ministers should experience life as an average Singaporean by taking a 50 percent pay cut, living in Housing and Development Board (HDB) flats for five years, and taking public transport to the office – just to teach them how difficult life in Singapore is.

Despite the many calls for voting the PAP out, one person, Nelson Wong, noted that he agrees that the government does not “walk their own talk” but offered an explanation that the system allows them to stay in control even if they do lose a seat in parliament.

Another person, Tom Wang, simply said that it’s not possible to vote the PAP out because Singaporeans “have no guts” to do it.

Another person, Isman Rahman, opted for a gentler approach by emphasising that the message here is that Singaporeans just want a “fair government” who looks after its citizens.

There was also one person who turned the question around to Dr Chee, asking how much he would pay himself if he was a full minister.

There were also several netizens who disagreed with Dr Chee’s implication that a minimum wage should be implemented.

     

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

郑国明:探访亨德申路租赁组屋有感 让所有梦想幻灭地方…

撰文:人民之声党成员郑国明   林殊译 在飞往伦敦的班机上,我观看了香港电影《沦落人》(Still human),这是一个非常触动人心的故事,讲述一个半身不遂的老人梁先生(黄秋生饰演)与菲律宾女佣Evelyn Santo(Crisel Consunji饰演)居住在狭窄的公屋的故事。 狭窄昏暗的居住环境,让梁先生和菲佣日常生活显得非常心酸,菲佣的收入非常少,所以急于赚钱将家用寄回家中喂养孩子。然而,两人之间有相当大的差异:梁先生放弃所有获得好生活的希望与梦想;反观菲佣则是持续拥抱她自己无法完成的梦想-成为专业摄影师。 梁先生在意识到菲佣的梦想对他而言非常重要后,两人的生活产生了戏剧性的改变。梁先生为菲佣购买新的相机并帮助他完成摄影作品,好让她能够参加国际比赛,而最终她也胜出,故事的终结在菲佣结束合约持续追逐梦想,而善良的梁先生则继续不怀梦想地生活在公屋中,对生活并无任何期待。 那么,这个电影与我去探访探访亨德森路租赁组屋所见所闻,又有什么关联? 我与我的志工团队前往探访发现,许多住户的生活日复一日,过着捉襟见肘的生活。简言之,他们并没有足够的收入,或者无法从政府机构取得任何有意义的财务援助。有些住户则因健康问题无法工作,要么只能靠收入微薄的儿女,或者和行动不便的另一半共同生活。 其中一名女住戶回想起过往的经验,他向他的议员求助,却被转介到一个又一个的单位,最终不了了之。她说,“真是浪费时间”。另外几名住户则表示他们曾因为无法去邮局充值,结果房子电源被切断。试想,全家包括小朋友需要呆在黑暗之中整晚,直到父母去充值恢复屋内电源。 这到底是什么样的现代租赁组屋生活?…

Foreign workers organised sit-down protest at CBD, demanding unpaid salaries of nearly S$300,000

On Wednesday (March 6), over 30 foreign workers participated in a sit-down…

Netizen slams Straits Times for its "Team Singapore Report Card" for athletes in SEA games 2019

Calling out Straits Times for the “Team Singapore Report Card” published in…

MOH confirms 20 new cases of COVID-19 infection; Total tally at 57,685

As of Saturday noon (26 Sep), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…