On Wednesday (4 March), during the committee of supply debate in Parliament, Aljunied GRC MP Sylvia Lim posed several questions regarding the types of projects that require the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) approval that involve major alterations or replacement works to fix installation.

Ms Lim asked if the BCA examines the certifications and other paperwork of Qualified Persons (QP) engaged by project owners. On this, she asked, “To what extent does the BCA itself verifies the soundness of these certifications?”

The MP cited that the Ministry of National Development (MND) had outlined details, back in July 2018, regarding the standard procedures involving building projects. According to Ms Lim, the MND specified that during the planned submission stage, the BCA would perform a sampling check of the plans and design calculations of selected key structural elements. This is done to ascertain that the QP and accredited checker has carried out the designs and checks in accordance with the building and control legislative requirements.

The MND had also assured that the BCA would conduct targeted inspection on structural works during the construction stage.

Therefore, Ms Lim questioned if the checks carried out by these agencies are the same as those which had previously worked on the Pan-Island Expressway (PIE) project. She queried, “Does the collapse of the structure and the facts found by the court indicate any loophole that needs to be plugged?”

In view of that, she also asked, “Is there a need for the agencies to play a larger role in regulating building projects to ensure public safety?”

The questions raised by Ms Lim relate to the incident in 2017 where a PIE viaduct had collapsed, resulting in the death of one person and leaving ten others injured. To date, a number of professionals associated with the project have been charged and convicted in court.

Among them was an Indonesian engineer, Mr Arianto Tjandra, who was sentenced by the court last December to serve 86 weeks in jail along with a fine of $10,000 for being the lead person who was responsible in designing and preparing the building work plans for the said viaduct.

It was established in court that Mr Tjandra knew his team of five engineers were inexperienced in designing bridges. However, he failed to provide proper guidance and instructions to his team who led the construction of the viaduct.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Activist Gilbert Goh and celebrity chef, KF Seetoh distribute 300 meals to migrant workers, less-privileged and Malaysian workers

After delivering 5,000 masks and some crackers to the migrant workers living…

尚穆根“外国势力干预”论 正是人民行动党“屡试不爽的策略”

针对日前,内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根声称,新加坡在一定程度上已经面对外来势力的干预的言论,人权律师张素兰反讽,这正是人民行动党“屡试不爽的策略”。 今日(26日)人权律师张素兰于脸书专页功能八号氏族会发表一篇名为《外来干涉?》(FOREIGN INTERFERENCE?)的贴文,指出每当批评人民行动党言论的文章被刊登,都会将矛头指向外国人,以意图制造新加坡分裂而被指责。 此外,针对尚穆根日前点名本社与《新叙事》(NewNaratif)接受外国款项与聘雇外国人一事,张素兰形容,该行为就如同一场“政治迫害”(witch hunt),直指每当人民行动党在打压之前,总会拿出有“外来干涉”等理由。 “每当人民行动党在打压之前,总是会以“外来势力干涉新加坡事务”为由,这是屡试不爽的策略,过去在1963年大量使用与破坏对他们不利的指控。” 张素兰:这是人民行动党一贯的伎俩 张素兰在文内也提及当年的“冷藏行动”以及其他相关事件,直指这是人民行动党所采取的一贯伎俩。 她表示,当时汶莱左派领导人阿扎哈利(A.M. Azahari)在发动“汶莱武装事变”(1962年12月8日)之前,曾会见我国反对党领袖,社阵领导人林清祥。当天的两人会面,却给已故总理李光耀很好的借口,以遭“外来干涉”为由,发动“冷藏行动”。 “当天是在一个著名的马来菜饭的餐厅享用午餐,而且午餐聚会还被内部安全局所监视。据林福寿医生说法,我国反对党领袖只是发表声援声明,未曾提供任何财务与物质上的支持”。 张素兰续指,“那场午餐聚会成为李光耀的接口,得以发动那一直被推迟的“冷藏行动”。他声称汶莱武装事变是“上天赐予的好时机”,逾133名反对党领袖和批评人民行动党的人,在内安法令下遭拘捕和扣留。”…

MOM: Record-low workplace fatalities in 2019, but non-fatal injuries increased

In 2019, the number of workplace fatalities in the country dropped to…

MND highlights AHTC's late submission of financial statements; AHTC unable to secure internal auditor from public tender

Minister for National Development (MND) has announced that Aljunied-Hougang Town Council (AHTC) has…