On Thursday (5 March), Associate Professor Walter Theseira, a Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP), urged the government to address the problem of food security in a Supply Debate Speech.

Assoc. Prof Theseira argued in his speech that though Singapore is a rich country, there are still many who struggle to afford sufficient healthy food.

The Assoc. Prof remarked, “Singapore was ranked by the Economist Intelligence Unit as the fourth most secure Food Nation in the world, yet nearly half of a sample of 236 families in Singapore have reported moderate to severe food insecurities. These were the findings of a 2018 report by the Hunger and Food Lover’s Paradise by the Lien Centre of Social Innovation Centre at Singapore Management University (SMU)”.

He added that there were some 125 food support groups operating in Singapore, in addition to food support from ethnic self-help groups and community organisations.

During the Budget Supply Speech, Assoc. Prof Theseira posed a pointed question. He asked, “A basic question is how much food is enough. But the question is, enough for what?”

According to the Assoc. Prof, the 2019 Minimum Income Standards study led by Dr Ng Kok Hoe of the Lee Kwan Yew School of Public Policy, a single elderly household requires an estimate of S$400 for food, which is about 29 per cent of their budget.

He explained, “More importantly, that study reveals that Singaporeans consider food to be more than calories for the body; it is nourishment for the soul. It includes having meaningful choice and variety, the opportunity to eat healthily but also enjoy the occasional indulgence, and the chance to meet friends at the hawker centre or invite others to a home-cooked meal.”

He added, “It is not three restaurant meals a day. It is three meals with dignity.”

To illustrate his point, the Assoc. Prof Theseira quotes a study by Diana Ong from the Chinese Assistance Development Council and Dr Ong Qiyan from the Social Service Research Centre, National University of Singapore (NUS). The study revealed that lower income families who opt for healthier meals spend S$204 per month, per person.

This sum is much more than what a less healthy diet costs, which is S$168. The big difference in spending is not in eating out, but is in trying to eat a healthier home cooked diet, said the associate professor.

“These results are consistent with the food insecurity–obesity paradox that in a rich country, food insecurity manifests not as starvation, but as an inadequate and unhealthy diet that exposes the poor to risks of obesity and malnutrition,” he said.

Assoc. Prof Theseira also highlighted that though food insecurity here may not indicate starvation, it does contribute to the problem of people making difficult choices to choose between the nutrition of a family and having enough money for other necessities.

Because of this, many food charities have stepped up to bridge the gap that these families desperately require.

“Despite good intentions, charities are struggling to meet this varied needs,” the NMP explained.

Assoc. Prof Theseira then cautioned that though Budget 2020 aims to distribute S$100 per year in grocery vouchers to help needy households over the next two years, there is a need for a full Government food security programme.

In addition to that, the Assoc. Prof also broached the issue on his Facebook post yesterday. In his post, he explained that food security programmes should be designed to incorporate the need to improve health for families and children, not just for today but for years to come.

To him, there is ample evidence suggesting that nutrition in childhood and economic growth goes hand-in-hand. Therefore, he emphasised that there is a need to address and solve this problem.

“Food security programmes can improve health for families and children not just today, but many years later. There is increasing evidence of the link between nutrition in childhood, and economic and health outcomes years down the road. Let’s commit to officially measuring food insecurity and addressing it as a Government priority.” he wrote.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

TOC Exclusive: Interview with Tan Kin Lian at Speakers’ Corner

TOC spent a few minutes with Tan Kin Lian at Speakers’ Corner.

MOH and NEA informed of Singapore’s first Zika virus infection

The Ministry of Health (MOH) and National Environment Agency (NEA) have been…

为减轻学费、生活负担 两年来大专“甜心宝贝”剧增

大学学费频频上涨,部分大学生曾反映生活负担沉重;然而,争议性网络约会网站Sugarbook的统计,选择其他经济支援管道的大学生越来越多,有者选择兼职,有者选择成为“甜心宝贝”。 网上约会网站Sugarbook显示,从2018年至2019年期间,我国大学生注册人数跃升了32巴仙,意味着有更多大学生目前正在寻找能够提供经济支持的甜心爸爸或甜心妈咪。 所谓的甜心宝贝,就是指透过陪伴和约会来换取金钱或物质上的利益;而甜心爸爸或妈妈则是提供金钱或物质利益者。 据Sugarbook中标题为《调涨大学学费的另一解决方法:甜心约会》的报告中指出,全国有超过2000名就读大学的甜心宝贝是该网站会员。报告还列出了最多学生成为“甜心宝贝”的前十所大专。 新加坡南洋理工大学共有643名学生担任甜心宝贝,位居冠军,接着是拥有487名学生的新加坡管理学院,而身为“国际巨星”的新加坡国立大学屈居第三,具有413名学生。 令人咋舌的是,虽然只是较小的教会学校,但是新加坡神学院也榜上有名,共有12名学生选择成为甜心宝贝。 可成为甜心宝贝人生导师 该网站创始人达伦·陈(译音,31岁)指出,“由于学费不断飙升,负担不起昂贵的高等教育费用家庭,都被迫贷款缴费”。 “更糟糕的是,学生在求学时期,还必须处理多种工作和压力,最终因无法负担而选择辍学。平均来说,一名甜心宝贝每个月能够获得最多2000元的津贴,这对陷入困境的大学生而言,是很大的帮助。” “甜心爸爸或妈妈不仅提供经济援助,还能充当生活导师,提供大量财务、人脉交流和职业发展等方面的指导,以提高有抱负专业人士在大学时期的职业和生活方式。” 甜心宝贝是一份工作 一名曾于1月份接受网络媒体AsiaOne访问的23岁女子,菲利斯·安(Felice…

椅置诊所外就接千元罚单 市镇会:不重犯可免罚款

在诊所外的黄格子里摆放为病患准备的塑料椅子一个晚上,诊所医生就接到市镇理事会开出千元罚单,甚至要求医生立即收回椅子。结果当时还在盛港医院的诊所医生被迫赶回诊所收拾椅子,更拍下视频表达不满和不理解。 市镇理事会随后即刻澄清,并不知道医生人在医院,而且只要诊所在收工时将椅子收到诊所内,他们可免除有关罚款。 有关事件发生在勿洛北,收到罚单的是一家在勿洛北2道第416座组屋楼下的私人诊所WAN Medical Clinic。 据悉,有关罚单是在6月13日开出,指该诊所将椅子摆放在诊所外的黄格子内过夜,所以罚款一千元。若没在期限内缴交罚款,罚款将加倍至不超过5000元。 不理解市镇会决定 诊所医生穆罕默德(Dr Muhammad Iqmal)于7月8日在脸书上帖文,表示他诊所外的椅子都是为病人准备的,而且也没有影响到交通,所以无法理解市镇会开出罚单的原因。 他表示,每天早晨都有许多病人在诊所外排队等候,有些患者甚至来得比医生和工作人员都早,所以每晚将椅子收到诊所内实在是不合理的。 他指出,公共诊所也有类似做法,而且诊所外的黄格子面积只能放下约六张椅子,不会阻碍到车辆和人群走动。…