Hand with red pencil tied with rope, depicting the idea of freedom of the press or freedom of expression on dark background in low key. international human rights day concept (Photo by siam.pukkato from Shutterstock).

China began censoring online discussions on the new coronavirus weeks before officially acknowledging the scope of the disease, according to a report published Tuesday.

Although Chinese authorities did not publicly acknowledge the severity of the virus until January 20, censorship began as early as December 31, said researchers at the University of Toronto’s Citizen Lab.

Even general terms such as “unknown Wuhan pneumonia” and “Wuhan Health Commission” were deemed taboo in the early weeks of the epidemic, said the report.

More than 3,100 people have died and over 90,000 have been infected worldwide by the virus.

Citizen Lab said its research showed at least one social media platform in China was blocking some virus content three weeks before the government confirmed it was spreading between people.

That “strongly suggests that social media companies came under government pressure to censor information at early stages of the outbreak,” the report said.

In China it is common for social media companies to scrub content considered politically sensitive, including protests and government criticism.

From the end of December to mid-February, Citizen Lab found more than 500 blocked keywords and phrases on WeChat — which has over one billion active monthly users — as well as on live-streaming platform YY.

Some censored terms referred to information that was later made official, such as the fact that the virus was contagious.

The two apps also censored a broad range of keywords, including factual information.

For instance, messages that included the words “pneumonia”, “disease control and prevention”, “virus”, and “medical journal” were censored when Citizen Lab tested WeChat on February 14.

“What makes this case unique is the potential public health harm blocking this information may have,” said Lotus Ruan, researcher at Citizen Lab, commenting on the broad scope of censorship.

Doing so can “limit (the) public’s ability to be informed and protect themselves,” she told AFP.

Though the death of a whistleblowing doctor prompted rare calls for political reform in February, Beijing has doubled down on censorship.

In early February China’s cyberspace authority said it would “supervise” the country’s largest social media firms on virus-related content.

And Chinese President Xi Jinping called for even tighter control over online discussion to ensure “positive energy” and social stability.

“So far Beijing seems to draw the wrong conclusion from the crisis, that it needs to repress more, not less,” said Lokman Tsui, a communications professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

– AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

以优惠价企图骗订金! 网友揭自身经历提醒勿贪小便宜

近日我国电话诈骗频传,许多民众纷纷接到骗子的来电,并将与骗子“斗智斗勇”的视频上传到网络上。这些诈骗电话多数自称来自银行,但也有网友在近日表示,居然在网络上购物时,也差点被骗。 该名网友Paul Teo在脸书上公开自己差点受骗的历程。据帖文指出,他原本想透过网络上购买手机,但自己未使用官方网购平台,而是和一位卖家私信,后者以“优惠价”欲向他达成交易。 起初,他并未即时意识到异常,加上骗徒具有说服力与被优惠价所吸引,当局者迷,才会一步步陷入骗徒圈套。 “他(骗徒)非常具有说服力,称自己也有家室,想和我套关系,并以可立即获得手机和优惠价为由诱惑我。” Paul表示,一切布局看似极具吸引,但在获得手机前,他表示必须先付定金200元。对此,Paul也指出,起初并不疑有他,但Paul提议面对面付款,而骗徒却以公司政策,并将自己的身份证字号拍给他看,让他安心。 “我当时心想,不会有人为了骗我200块而和我谈了将近三小时吧”,于是他最后决定先付定金,并等待手机的到来。 不料,未等到手机到来前,骗徒再以“冠病保障定金”为由,要求再付300元。网友说,当下他才恍然大悟,原来这一切皆为骗局。 Paul随后便向他讨回之前的订金而被骗徒拒绝,骗徒此时仍试图说服他继续购买。但此时的网友已意识到,并警告骗徒若无法偿还订金,他会立即报警。 网友也称赞警方的办事效率,并指出目前已报警处理,警方也设法助他索回损失。 对此,网友也表示,千万不要因为贪小便宜而落入骗徒的圈套,为了阻止更多的人受骗,他也决定将自身经历放上网络,以示警告。 该帖文截至今日已获得逾900次转载,逾800多赞,网友纷纷表示天下果然没有白费的午餐,部分网友也指出有些骗局确实具有说服力,让你难以分出真假,只能提醒自己不要贪小便宜。

Is this a violation of worksite safety rules?

Andrew Loh – In the video that follows this article (see above),…

AHPETC found guilty of holding a trade fair without permit from NEA

The Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) was found guilty for holding a festive trade fair…

Dr Chee Soon Juan does not think PAP did a good job in its welfare programme

Dr Chee Soon Juan, Secretary-General of Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) and the…