• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
    • Volunteer
  • Subscribe
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
    • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Politics
    • Civil Society
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

High court dismiss TOC’s appeal on correction direction appeal; Judge says ‘reporting defence’ would frustrate POFMA

by kathleen
19/02/2020
in Current Affairs
Reading Time: 6 mins read
0

The High Court has dismissed The Online Citizen’s (TOC) appeal against the Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam’s Correction Direction issued under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA).

The appeal filed by TOC pertained to a correction direction (CD) issued on 22 January on an article published by TOC regarding allegations made by Malaysian-based human rights organisation Lawyers For Liberty (LFL) on the judicial execution methods employed at Singapore’s Changi Prison.

In setting out the reasons underlying her decision, Justice Belinda Ang said that there were two components to TOC’s arguments under Section 17(5)(b), namely:

First, that the court can set aside the Part 3 CD on the basis that the “subject statement” is “not a statement of fact”, as Section 2(2)(a) of POFMA provides that “a statement of fact is a statement which reasonable person seeing, hearing or otherwise perceiving would consider being a representation of fact” and

Second, that POFMA empowers the court to set aside the CD on the grounds that the “subject statement” is a “true statement of fact” as provided in Section 2(2)(b), which states that “a statement is false if it is false or misleading, whether wholly or in part, and whether on its own or in the context which it appears”.

The subject statement in question here refers to the allegations made by LFL on the brutality of executions at Changi Prison, specifically.

High Court “unable to accept” TOC’s argument that the statement is not a statement of fact

On the first component of whether the subject is actually a statement of fact, Justice Ang says she is “unable to accept” TOC’s argument that the subject statement is a report based on hearsay.

Justice Ang went on to highlight two “critical errors” made by TOC.

Firstly, according to the judge, TOC had wrongly assumed that there is another category of ‘statement’ under POFMA. Instead, said Justice Ang, there are only two types of statements: “fact” and “opinion” under Section 17 of POFMA.

Secondly, Justice Ang asserted that “an unverified but verifiable report based on hearsay” can be a statement of fact.

She went on to say that a “reasonable person” who read the article would regard it as a “statement of fact”.

Therefore, Justice Ang ruled that TOC’s basis to set aside the CD under the first limb fails.

Reporting defence would frustrate POFMA legislation

In paragraph 15 of the judgement, Justice Ang said that it is up to TOC to prove the truth of the statement, and not for the respondent — in this case the Minister of Home Affairs — to prove the falsehood of the statement.

On the issue of whether the statements in TOC’s article are “true” as outlined in Section 17(5)(b) of POFMA, Justice Ang noted that it is untenable for TOC to assert that the article is “a true statement of fact” simply on the grounds that it is a report on LFL’s press statement.

Explaining TOC’s ”reporting defence”, Justice Ang said that the court has to take into account the use of quotation marks and quoted extracts, adding that the subject statement is true when read in context and that TOC “simply reported the fact alone”.

However, the judge went on to explain the AGC’s response to this particular argument by TOC. Justice Ang said that the AGC’s contention is that the Minister directed the CD against the subject statement, and not against TOC’s statement that LFL had made certain allegations.

The AGC argued that while TOC’s assertion that the statement in its article was about LFL’s statement is true, it is inconsequential, given that the CD was confined to the relevant subject statement — namely about the alleged execution methods carried out in Changi Prison.

The AGC argued that since TOC had not taken a position on the truth of the statement in question and has provided no evidence on that matter, TOC has thus failed to provide evidence to discharge its burden of proof that the statement is true.

Having heard from both parties, Justice Ang said that TOC’s “reporting defence” is based on a misconstruction of the “subject statement”.

She pointed out that while it is true that LFL made certain allegations, that is not what this case is about.

She noted that TOC had conceded at the start of the hearing that the statement in question is the statement identified in the CD. Therefore, TOC cannot now define the context of the statement, the judge reasoned.

Justice Ang also explained why TOC’s knowledge of whether the subject statement is actually true is “immaterial” in her view, as laid out in Section 11(4) of POFMA.

Section 11(4) states that “[a] person who communicated a false statement of fact in Singapore may be issued a Correction Direction even if the person does not know or has no reason to believe that the statement is false”.

Justice Ang highlighted that a Minister is thus not prevented or prohibited from issuing a CD even in circumstances where a party believes the statement they made is true when it is actually not.

Thus, the fact that TOC did not know whether the statement was true is “ultimately an immaterial consideration”, according to the judge.

Further, added Justice Ang, any “reporting defence” would “frustrate” the legislative purpose of prevention as laid out in POFMA.

Justice Ang said that Sections 5(a) and 11(4) of POFMA target not only “tale-makers” but “tale-bearers” as well. This means that no weight is given to a person’s honest, innocent or ignorant dissemination of false information, said the judge.

Consequently, TOC’s defence — that it was merely “reporting” the statement made by LFL without confirming or knowing the statement’s veracity — is not a defence at all, said Justice Ang.

Justice Ang noted that TOC has repeatedly insisted that it has taken no position on the truth of the subject statement.

This, said the judge, denotes that TOC does not argue that the statements are “true” in as intended by Section 17(5)(b) of POFMA which it relied on.

“Therefore, TOC has no legal basis for its application to set aside under the second limb of s 17(5)(b) of the POFMA, and this alone is sufficient to dispose of the issue”, the judge reasoned.

Touching further on the issue of burden of proof, TOC had failed to discharge its “legal or evidential burden of proving the balance of probabilities that the subject statement is true”.

Justice Ang had earlier sought written submissions from TOC and AGC to to be made on s2(1) of the evidence act and its effect on the issue of the onus of proof. Law firm, Eugene Thuraisingam LLP had represented TOC in the written submission.

As such, Justice Ang said, “there is no need to consider the respondent’s evidence”.

Justice Ang said, however, that she did consider the respondent’s evidence, which was presented in the form of an affidavit by Deputy Director of Operations Management of Singapore Changi Prison Service Mr Ong Pee Eng, and said that she had “no reason to doubt Mr Ong’s evidence”.

Other than TOC, CDs were also issued to Yahoo! Singapore and journalist Kirsten Han for publishing and sharing articles and/or Facebook posts containing the allegations made by LFL published on the organisation’s website on 16 Jan.

TOC had previously applied for the correction direction to be cancelled. However, Mr Shanmugam rejected the application on the grounds that TOC had not provided any grounds to show that the issuance of the CD had not been satisfied.

Following that, TOC took the matter to the High Court to appeal against the Minister’s order.

For a background of the case, please read TOC’s previous article: ‘High Court reserves judgement on TOC POFMA appeal‘.

For just US$7.50 a month, sign up as a subscriber on The Online Citizen Asia (and enjoy ads-free experience on our site) to support our mission to transform TOC into an alternative mainstream press.

Related Posts

457 civil society organizations call on ASEAN to move beyond the Five-Point Consensus
AFP

Myanmar junta sets out tough new rules for political parties

27/01/2023
Thai ruling party names deputy PM as main election candidate
AFP

Thai ruling party names deputy PM as main election candidate

27/01/2023
Mrs Teo says SG continues to invest in training local talent while MNCs transfer staff to work in SG
Labour

Mrs Teo says SG continues to invest in training local talent while MNCs transfer staff to work in SG

27/01/2023
One third of Amazon ‘degraded’ by human activity, drought: study
AFP

One third of Amazon ‘degraded’ by human activity, drought: study

27/01/2023
Luxembourg court sets aside Sulu heirs’ attachment order to enforce US$15b claim against Malaysia
Court Cases

Luxembourg court sets aside Sulu heirs’ attachment order to enforce US$15b claim against Malaysia

27/01/2023
Philippines to appeal ICC resumption of drug war probe
AFP

Philippines to appeal ICC resumption of drug war probe

27/01/2023
Subscribe
Connect withD
Login
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Notify of
Connect withD
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Latest posts

457 civil society organizations call on ASEAN to move beyond the Five-Point Consensus

Myanmar junta sets out tough new rules for political parties

27/01/2023
Thai ruling party names deputy PM as main election candidate

Thai ruling party names deputy PM as main election candidate

27/01/2023
Mrs Teo says SG continues to invest in training local talent while MNCs transfer staff to work in SG

Mrs Teo says SG continues to invest in training local talent while MNCs transfer staff to work in SG

27/01/2023
One third of Amazon ‘degraded’ by human activity, drought: study

One third of Amazon ‘degraded’ by human activity, drought: study

27/01/2023
Luxembourg court sets aside Sulu heirs’ attachment order to enforce US$15b claim against Malaysia

Luxembourg court sets aside Sulu heirs’ attachment order to enforce US$15b claim against Malaysia

27/01/2023
Philippines to appeal ICC resumption of drug war probe

Philippines to appeal ICC resumption of drug war probe

27/01/2023

ASEAN governments must stop using ‘lawfare’ against critics, Southeast Asian MPs say

27/01/2023
Low Yen Ling says MTI and MAS don’t expect persistent inflation but they now say inflation projected to “stay elevated”

Low Yen Ling says MTI and MAS don’t expect persistent inflation but they now say inflation projected to “stay elevated”

27/01/2023

Trending posts

Two Indian nationals paid about S$330 and S$730 respectively for forged certificates submitted in their S-Pass application

MOM found issuing EPs meant for foreign PMETs to PRC waitress and general worker

by Correspondent
26/01/2023
32

...

Ho Ching breaks silence over Temasek’s write down of its US$275 million investment in FTX, says it “can afford to be contrarian”

US regulator questions VCs’ due diligence work prior to investing in FTX; Ho Ching says Temasek can afford to be contrarian

by The Online Citizen
24/01/2023
28

...

Indian rupee falls 60% since signing of CECA while Singapore becomes top investor in India

by Correspondent
25/01/2023
48

...

High court dismiss TOC’s appeal on correction direction appeal; Judge says ‘reporting defence’ would frustrate POFMA

by kathleen
19/02/2020
0

...

“党籍不会过期失效”  前进党称已就党籍终止知会卡拉

AGC asked to explain purposes of 68 private letters of inmates illegitimately forwarded to prosecutors

by The Online Citizen
21/01/2023
16

...

Temasek and GIC reportedly in talks with Adani Group accused of “brazen” market manipulation and accounting fraud

Temasek and GIC reportedly in talks with Adani Group accused of “brazen” market manipulation and accounting fraud

by The Online Citizen
26/01/2023
32

...

February 2020
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272829  
« Jan   Mar »
  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Letter submission
  • Contact Us

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

wpDiscuz