Last week (4 February), Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said in Parliament that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs will extend consular assistance to Singaporeans detained or arrested abroad, and help ensure that they are accorded due process under the local laws.

When asked by Worker’s Party MP Leon Perera whether the MFA will extend consular request to every request made to the ministry from a next of kin or from the detained person itself, if it is permitted by local authorities and does not contravene local laws, Dr Balakrishnan answered in the affirmative.

But is that truly the case?

Mr Mohan Rajangam, who was arrested by the Singapore Police Force and subsequently extradited to Malaysia on March 2015 over a charge made against him for a murder that took place in Penang Island, said in a follow-up interview with TOC that Dr Balakrishnan’s statement does not tally with his personal experience at all.

Following Dr Balakrishnan’s statement in Parliament, Mr Mohan responded that the MFA did not exactly do much at all to help him or his family at all while he was detained in Penang for four month.

He explained that his cousin had to get in touch with MFA via email and they said that they would check with Malaysian authorities before getting back to the family to tell them what can be done.

However, when MFA got back to the family, the ministry merely gave them the name and contact number of the officer in charge in Penang. The family would have to obtain permission from the officer themselves if they wanted to to visit Mr Mohan.

He told TOC, “And after that, there is no help from them”.

Mr Mohan told us that MFA did not visit him even once during the four months that he was detained, nor was there any other sort of help extended by the ministry to either Mr Mohan or his family during this difficult time.

Mr Mohan explained that he had asked the officer in charge of his case that he wanted to speak to someone at the Singapore consulate. Unfortunately, the officer told him that they would know what to do if they wanted to visit him, adding that the local authorities cannot do anything about it.

“For the past four months I was waiting day by day, if they will come,” lamented Mr Mohan.

“If they come and visited me earlier, I think I won’t be suffering there for four months. And they will know what is happening. They did not come and visit,” he added, noting that he even had to find his own way back to Singapore after he was released.

When Mr Mohan tried to leave Malaysia, he was told that he had overstayed for four months—those months that he was detained with no help from the MFA. He then had to go back to the investigation officer who gave him a letter to explain his situation.

Mr Mohan then had to also pay a fine of S$100 and buy another ticket to get back to Singapore.

He questioned MFA’s handling of the case, noting that since they sent him to Malaysia in the first place via the proper channels, why couldn’t they also do the same to get him home?

Again, he pointed out that if the MFA had visited him, they would be aware of his release and could have provided some assistance. After all, his identity card and passport were seized when he was detained.

Earlier, Mr Mohan has told TOC that when he was finally released from lock-up in Penang, the local authorities forgot to return his passport. Only when he asked did they take him to see the investigating officer who then gave him back his passport and only a copy of his identity card.

Mr Mohan also raised the point of MFA not keeping his family appraised or updated about what was happening with Mr Mohan. He said that they had to go to a neighbourhood police post to find out more detail. The family was also shocked to hear via Mr Mohan’s cousin that he was facing murder charges.

“Our Singapore police force should inform my family. And I told the officer, please inform my family,” he said.

He added that Singapore authorities had told him they knew what they were doing just before they handed him over to Malaysian authorities at the Woodland’s checkpoint. But Mr Mohan questioned if that was true, again pointing to the fact that his family was kept in the dark by MFA and the SPF.

He said he heard all of these stories from his family after he got back. They told him that no one informed them of what was happening.

This seems to contradict what Dr Balakrishnan said in Parliament last week.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

URA investigates case of blocked access to Clifford Pier

Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) is investigating a case where access to Clifford Pier…

下周起调高违例停车罚款额 网民褒贬不一

下周起,违例停车罚款额将调高,调幅甚至高达20元。网民褒贬不一,但是也有网民认为,这真的是一个“very Fine country”(罚款很多的国家)。 建屋发展局和市区重建局昨日(6月24日)发布联合文告指出,将调高违例停车的罚款额,确保能有效阻遏违规停车行为。文告中所指的违规停车行为包括了非法停车、没有使用或错误展示停车固本或停车应用,以及避缴停车场收费等。 当局指出,电单车、汽车和重型车辆的非法停车罚款额将分别从25元、50元和80元,调高到35元、70元和100元。 没有使用或错误展示停车固本、或没有出示用手机应用程序缴付停车费,汽车和重型车辆的车主将分别被罚款40元和50元,电单车骑士的罚款额不变。 超时停车,汽车车主的罚款额会从6元到20元,调高到8元到24元;重型车辆车主的罚款额则从12元到40元,调高到16元到48元;电单车骑士的罚款额不变。 在停车场电子收费闸门企图躲避收费的电单车骑士,罚款额将从25元调高到35元,汽车和重型车辆车主的罚款额也分别从50元和80元,调高到70元和100元。 三年年均发出26万罚单 文告中指出,当局自2016年至2018年之间,平均每年发出约26万零800张非法停车罚单,其中包括了违例占用电单车或重型车辆的停车位,以及违例占用季票停车位。 另外,驾车人士在使用建屋局或市建局管理的停车场时,应该支付停车费。若没有使用有效停车固本,或手机应用程序付费,都将面对罚款。 这三年期间,针对没支付或少支付停车费的驾驶者,建屋局和市建局每年平均开出57万3000张罚单。…

Man shocked to find out five foreigners registered his residential address as their residing address with MOM

A man named Ruzaidie Dar Surnik got a shock of his life…

Declaration of 33rd ASEAN Summit and related summits as an Enhanced Security Special Event

The 33rd ASEAN Summit and related summits, which are to be held…