Source: K Shanmugam Sc / Facebook

Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam on Sat (1 Feb) denied allegations that frontline Immigration and Checkpoint Authority (ICA) officers had been instructed not to wear face masks while on duty, in light of the Wuhan novel coronavirus outbreak

Mr Shanmugam told reporters on a visit to Woodlands Checkpoint on Sat that ICA officers working at Customs and customer service counters the immigration checkpoints have been given the same protocols as other frontline officers from other government departments.

“I think there has been a misunderstanding. If you are not well, then you shouldn’t even be there,” he said, noting that officers on duty could wear face masks if they felt the need to do so.

Mr Shanmugam said that practicing good personal hygiene is more crucial, as there is a high risk of being infected with the virus through touching contaminated surfaces.

“The riskiest part of the body right now is your hands, many of us touch things and bring it to our face, that’s the possibility of the virus going in,” he said.

Mr Shanmugam in a Facebook post on Sat also said that ICA officers at Woodlands Checkpoint, who “have been working round the clock”, have carried out their duties “exceptionally well during this challenging period”.

While users on his Facebook post applauded his appreciation for the work of ICA officers at the checkpoints, they also questioned why the officers are still not wearing face masks, given the possible high risk of exposure to tourists who may carry the virus but are asymptomatic at the time of screening.

Frontline immigration officers allegedly “not allowed” to wear face masks while on duty, online users claim

Claims regarding frontline staff at immigration checkpoints not being permitted to wear face masks while on duty circulated online late last month, as seen in screenshots of Facebook posts dated 30 Jan below, one made by a user claiming to be a former ICA officer and another by an airport staff member.

Other claims suggested that the frontline immigration officers were not instructed to wear masks while screening visitors over at the counters to portray a positive image to visitors entering the country, particularly in the midst of rising xenophobic sentiments — Sinophobic in particular — against visitors from mainland China following the outbreak.

In neighbouring countries such as Malaysia and Thailand, all frontline immigration officers are instructed to wear face masks.

The Thaiger reported at the end of last month that immigration officers in Thailand at all airports nationwide are required to wear masks and gloves “as they must handle many passports and frequently converse with passengers”.

Earlier on 28 Jan, TOC sent a query to the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) regarding why frontline officers — barring those tasked to do health checks — at the immigration checkpoints did not put on face masks, as seen below.

However, we did not receive any reply from MHA regarding the claims.

MHA on 31 Jan, however, told Mothership that frontline ICA officers are not required to wear surgical masks because “the risk of infection from such transient contact is assessed to be low”.

“The health authorities generally define the level of close contact that is necessary for virus transmission as an exposure of at least 30 minutes within two metres of an infected person,” MHA added.

However, the Ministry added that officers who are unwell and have a fever, cough or runny nose should put on a surgical mask, and seek medical attention promptly.

“ICA officers who are assigned to perform clearance duties on travellers with respiratory symptoms (e.g. fever, cough, shortness of breath) will don surgical masks and disposable gloves,” the Ministry added.

Health experts in Singapore earlier told The Straits Times that there is no need for healthy people to wear the masks, as currently there is no community spread of the Wuhan virus in Singapore.

In the same vein, Gov.sg also reminded the public on Sat that the masks “are for those who are sick”, and that people who are in healthy condition do not need to wear a mask.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

亚马逊雨林有史以来最频繁大火 巴西总统反指控NGO纵火

有“世界之肺”之称的亚马逊热带雨林,今年遭遇有史以来最频繁的森林大火。根据巴西国家太空署(INPE)森林火灾计划数据指出,今年1月至8月集中在亚马逊地区的大火多达52.5巴仙,近7万3000宗。相比去年,火灾数量增加82巴仙,是自2013年来的最高纪录。 巴西国家太空署更指出,自上周四(15日)以来,其卫星图显示巴西共发生9507起火灾,大部分都位于亚马逊森林。其大火烟硝扩散,导致圣保罗城市出现浓烟蔽日。19日下午,天空突然暗了下午,并下起“黑雨”,事态严重,因而引起全国甚至是巴西总统的关注。 对此,巴西总统博尔索纳罗(Jair Bolsonaro)反而指控非政府组织,因被政府削减拨款,刻意向亚马逊森林纵火表达不满。 然而,当被问及是否握有证据证明时,博尔索纳罗表示,并没有实质证据。 《路透社》报道博尔索纳罗的言论遭非政府组织的抨击,他们声称该言论就像是“烟雾弹”,试图为他排斥环保的政策作掩护。 巴西绿色和平组织公共政策协调人艾斯特里尼(Marcio Astrini)批,“这是非常可恶的言论,近年来森林遭受大量砍伐,以及林火攻击就是反映他排斥环保的政策。 巴西环境保护研究所(Proam)所长波谷伊批评总统的言论不负责任,因为NGO把环境作为优先事项,说NGO放火烧林是无稽之谈。 非政府组织世界自然基金会巴西分会社会环境司法主任劳尔巴尔表示,博尔索纳罗的说词不负责任,因为政府缺乏有效控制手段,大火也为森林砍伐开辟空间。 专家指巴西政府鼓励农产发展,加速森林之灾 亚马逊雨林是世界上最大的热带雨林,为世界供20巴仙的氧气,因此有“世界之肺“之称。…

S Iswaran: Plans to remake Orchard Road

Minister for Trade and Industry (Industry) S Iswaran has spoken of plans to…

India re-opens more public spaces despite record virus infections

by Bhuvan Bagga Malls and temples re-opened in several cities across India…

39 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 4 cases in the community

As of Saturday noon (17 Apr), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…