TOC reported yesterday (14 Jan) that employers will now face prosecution in court and other harsh penalties for discriminatory hiring practices, including those involving making false declarations on fair hiring consideration.

Manpower Minister Josephine Teo warned that employers found guilty of engaging in workplace discrimination will not be permitted to apply for new work passes for a minimum of 12 months, 6 months more than the previous penalty. In the “most egregious cases”, she said the debarment period may extend to up to 24 months.

“This will mean stronger deterrence against workplace discrimination of any kind. More importantly, it sends a clear signal about the need for fairness at work,” she said. However, she also added that instances of discriminatory hiring practices are declining.

Under the Fair Consideration Framework (FCF), employers are required to advertise job openings for positions with a monthly salary of under S$15,000 on the national Jobs Bank for a minimum of 14 days before they are allowed to apply for an Employment Pass (EP) for a foreigner.

Together with the announcement of harsher penalties for discriminatory hiring practices, Manpower Ministry (MOM) also named a few companies caught for flouting FCF.

Companies caught for pre-selecting foreign job applicants and didn’t conduct any local job interviews

One company, Ti2 Logistics Pte Ltd, was caught for making a false declaration to MOM. It submitted an EP application for a foreign job applicant for the position of business development manager. It had also advertised for the position of accounts manager on the Jobs Bank.

For the former role, it made a false declaration that it had interviewed two Singaporeans and considered candidates fairly when it had not done so. For second role, the firm also treated the job advertising requirement under the FCF as a paper exercise, posting a job description unrelated to the actual job.

In reality, it had already pre-selected an EP applicant for the business development position and had no intention to interview any Singaporean candidates. MOM charged the company with one count of making a false declaration to the Controller of Work Passes in its EP application. It has also been debarred from hiring new EP holders or renewing existing work passes for two years.

Like Ti2 Logistics, two other companies also did not interview any locals even though they had put up advertisements on Jobs Bank. Before putting up the job advertisement, Meyer Burger (Singapore) Pte Ltd had already interviewed a foreigner overseas and deemed him suitable for a process engineer post in Singapore. It then advertised the position on Jobs Bank for the purpose of applying an EP for him.

Meyer Burger did not carry out any interviews since it had already made up its mind to hire the foreign worker. The job advertisement was posted solely to make an EP application. MOM debarred the company from hiring new EP holders or renewing existing work passes for two years.

Tarantula Global Holdings Pte Ltd similarly submitted an EP application for the position of senior IT support engineer. Like Meyer Burger and Ti2 Logistics, the company had pre-selected the EP applicant, who was a former employee of an affiliated overseas company. It put up a job advertisement, but likewise did not interview any candidates other than the chosen one. The company was debarred by MOM from hiring new EP holders or renewing existing work passes for 12 months.

Another company, Nihon Premium Clinic Pte Ltd, submitted an EP application for the position of regional customer development manager. It omitted listing critical key criteria in its job advertisement like the ability to speak fluent Japanese and Mandarin, when they were actually required for the job.

As a result, none of the job applications submitted was suitable for consideration as the local job applicants did not know that fluency in Japanese and Mandarin was required. Instead, an EP applicant recommended by one of the company’s shareholders was deemed suitable after an interview.

For not giving fair consideration to Singaporean candidates, Nihon Premium Clinic was debarred from hiring new EP holders or renewing existing work passes for 12 months.

Wasting Singaporeans’ time

All these companies could have avoided legal troubles with MOM if they had taken the trouble to at least “wayang” a bit to interview some local candidates.

In such cases, the companies can still give the excuse that they have interviewed the locals and did not find any of them suitable. It would then be difficult for MOM to find fault with these companies.

However, if they do so, it will also mean wasting more of Singaporean applicants’ time by inviting them to come for “bogus” interviews so as to help them apply EPs for their already pre-selected foreign candidates.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SGH ranked world’s top-10 but S’poreans pay highest in medical out-of-pocket expenditure

It was reported that the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) has been ranked…

Singapore: Modern Feudal Society?

Ajax Copperwater I remembered once reading on a forum that Singapore resembled…

Singapore downgrades its GDP growth forecast to “0% to 1%” in 2019 due to “strong headwinds”

Upon looking at the global and domestic economic environment, and the performance…

【选举】罗文丽:詹时中仍关心政治 希望更多反对党打入国会

昨日(7日),前波东巴西议员詹时中的太太罗文丽,在接受《联合晚报》采访时透露詹时中的近况。 罗文丽称,詹时中仍关心时事,在家也会看电视关注选举近况;而罗文丽出去助选回到家也会告知他一整天发生的事。 她很欣慰大家都很关心詹时中,且很多人都记得他,“他热爱、心系政治,心系人民,即使退休但是心和热枕都还在。” 罗文丽也认为,投给人民党一票,也等同投给詹时中,给予后者支持,因为后者也希望国会能看到更多反对党。 去年10月,人民党迎来领导层更迭,詹时中也卸下长达23年的秘书长一职。 詹时中已引领人民党近25年,更早在1984年,即成功赢得波动巴西议席,在该选区默默服务长达27载。惜后来身体欠恙,他最近一次出席的公众活动,是在去年8月22日的詹时中体育基金会募款晚宴。 至于罗文丽在2011-2015年间担任非选区议员,同样曾在波动巴西选区参选两次。在2011年,他仅以114票败给行动党候选人司徒宇斌。不过在任议员期间,罗文丽亦积极在国会反映和参与多项课题的辩论。 许多民众都会记得詹时中确实勤于走访选民,即使是这小小的动作,都能让人动心,是其他宏图大业也无法取代的。 至于此次选举角逐波东巴西议席的乔立盟,则立志延续詹时中精神,继续为该区居民服务。