SCDF ambulance (Photo: Terry Xu)

A tragic accident took place near Lucky Plaza whereby two people tragically lost their lives while four were injured.
All life is precious and it is therefore disappointing that The New Paper felt it necessary to emblazon in their headlines that “Two Filipino maids” were killed. Is it really relevant to mention the occupation of the victims? Seems like a cheap way to sell papers if you ask me. But I digress.
The main point of concern I wish to raise is in relation to the medical care that was provided to the victims of the accident.
The victims were conveyed to Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) via Singapore Civil Defense Force (SCDF) ambulances.
Given that the accident took place in the vicinity of Lucky Plaza, one does not need to be an expert in Geography to know that TTSH is by far not the nearest hospital.

In emergencies such as these, shouldn’t victims have been transported to the nearest hospital (in this case Mount Elizabeth Hospital)? Did the delay in transporting the victims contribute to the deaths?
Mount Elizabeth has since clarified that they would most definitely have treated the victims had they been activated.  The issue would appear therefore not to be one of costs as speculated by some but an issue with standard operating procedures of the SCDF.
According to government websites, SCDF emergency ambulances will convey patients to the closest designated restructured hospitals, to receive immediate medical attention. Ambulance personnel will not consider requests to redirect patients to alternative hospitals, even if patients have existing relationships with those facilities. 
As Mount Elizabeth is apparently not on the list of SCDF hospitals, the victims were not sent there despite it being pretty much beside the scene of the accident. Is this a case where blind adherence to standard operating procedures has trumped common sense?
Not to mention TTSH does not have a burns unit or cardiac surgery while Mount Elizabeth has far more cardiac surgeons and orthopedic surgeons than TTSH.
Secondly, shouldn’t our various ambulance services be more joined up? I would have thought that the standard operating procedure for any ambulance service would be to take patients to the nearest hospital in cases of emergency (which this clearly was) as opposed to some arbitrary “list”?
It would be a waste of life if lives that could have been potentially be saved, were lost because of this seemingly senseless delay.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

印度安得拉邦政府 正式搁置阿玛拉瓦提发展项目

印度安得拉邦(Andhra Pradesh)新政府,上周三(30)宣布终止与淡马锡旗下公司的协议,正式取消阿玛拉瓦提(Amaravati)新首府发展项目。 据印度媒体报道,淡马锡旗下公司自启动项目时便遇上土地问题,当时所分配到的土地(约1692英亩),有170英亩正好坐落在河床上。而根据《河流保护法》与印度国家绿色法庭的指示,该部分土地是不允许进行开发活动,迫使该公司必须寻找替代的土地。 尽管可以寻找其他替代土地,但找寻新的土地意味着必须改变核心基本建设,同时也会涉及与不同的地方政府交涉,问题变得相对复杂。 自2014年起,淡马锡旗下公司一直参与阿玛拉瓦提的建城项目。2015年,盛育控股集团(Surbana Jurong)便提出建成项目的总计划;2017年胜科城镇发展印度公司(Sembcorp Development India)与与星桥腾飞安得拉投资控股(Ascendas-Singbridge Andhra)成主要开发商;去年6月7日,胜科城镇发展印度公司与星桥腾飞安得拉投资控股合资成立公司,与印度安得拉邦政府签署阿玛拉瓦提起步开发区的股东协议与特许权开发协议。 新首长上任,指责前政府涉贪腐 根据项目计划显示,前安得拉邦政府将阿玛拉瓦提指定为期新邦府,其规模将会是新加坡的十倍大,牵涉数十亿元的投资,将分成三大阶段进行。 不过却事与愿违,在去年在印度大选中,奈杜领导的前地方执政党泰卢固之乡党(Telugu…

Heng accuses Dr Chee of spreading falsehoods – What about Charles Chong?

At a walkabout in East Coast GRC yesterday (3 Jul), PAP First…

The significance of Monica Baey’s judgement call to challenge the status quo that was disadvantaging her and her peers

by Joseph Nathan When Monica Baey escalated her case publicly, I was…

Millionaire Mah Bow Tan continues to hold shares in billionaire Sam Goi’s company

The son of billionaire Sam Goi, Ben Goi, 43, died on Sunday…