A new study made by Australian researcher Dr Iain Sinclair suggests that Singapore may be 1,000 years old instead of the generally accepted 700 years by scholars. He announced his findings early this month (7 Dec) at a conference at the Singapore Indian Heritage Centre.
Dr Sinclair has been studying the enigmatic Singapore Stone – a fragment of an ancient sandstone slab – over the past half a year. The Singapore Stone was actually a boulder stood at the mouth of the Singapore River for ages. The British blew it up in 1843 to clear and widen the passage for boats traveling up and down the Singapore River then.
There were ancient inscriptions carved on the boulder. When the British blew it up, only one of the fragments was retrieved and kept. The inscriptions on the fragment, now called the Singapore Stone, has puzzled scholars, academics and historians, including Sir Stamford Raffles ever since. No one could successfully and precisely decipher the inscribed text, recognized to be Kawi – a script used in the pre-Islamic Malay Archipelago.

Dr Sinclair managed to identify the phrase “kesariva” in the inscriptions which he said was part of the word “parakesarivarman” – a title used by several kings of the Tamil Chola dynasty in India. It suggests Tamil connections with the Strait of Singapore as far back as 1,000 years ago, thus redefining the island’s historical timeline. While researching, he opined that the stone could have been created at the beginning of the 11th century.
Dr Sinclair said he was encouraged by Ms Nalina Gopal, a curator at the Singapore Indian Heritage Centre, to take a shot at deciphering the Singapore Stone. They met at a seminar he conducted in July on the Chola invasion of the Malay world.
Indian expert describes findings as “enlightening”

Ms Gopal described Dr Sinclair’s findings as “enlightening”. She said that the findings remind Singaporeans that as a post-colonial nation, aspects of history and heritage “could be revisited for fresh interpretations”.
In an interview with Straits Times last year, Ms Gopal revealed she was born in Chennai and studied history at the University of Madras before moving to Singapore in 2008. She is now a PR.
She said that her great-grandfather deciphered inscriptions on temple walls and she inherited the taste for the historical from him. She added that she was drawn to the Singapore Indian Heritage Centre because of its unusual status as a diaspora museum that focuses on the stories of the migrant community.
In one of the exhibitions last year, she brought in craftsmen from across India to demonstrate their vanishing trades – from leather shadow puppet making to scroll painting. Also in the exhibition was the oldest object displayed in the museum thus far: a 3,000BC Indus Valley square seal from India. It was on loan from the National Museum of India. She said that she had received envious messages from friends from India, who had not had the chance to see it themselves.
“I am myself a member of the diaspora,” she told ST. “To be able to tell the story of this diaspora, to connect people with their culture in a way that is rarely done, is a rare opportunity. I love doing it.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

10 years – and still no public transport subsidy for disabled

The disabled asks for subsidy, not free public transport. Jonathan Koh.

Indonesian President cautions S'pore on "overreacting"

Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said yesterday that Singapore should reflect on…

取消分流制旨在消除歧视 媒体人默乐促勿打击好学生士气

在2019年国会中宣布将取消分流制度,改为因材施教,让学生们根据强项选读不同科目的水平,引起国民纷纷按赞,更要求尽快实施。但媒体人默乐呼吁,教育部此举是为了消除学习上的歧视,但不要打击了学生努力上进的士气。 资深媒体人兼《海峡时报》前副总编辑默乐(Bertha Henson)指出,在他的学生时代并没有分流制度,至少不是非常精细的那一种。当时的学生只要完成了六年的小学生涯,然后就是四年的中学生涯,而中学时期只分为文科和理科。“所谓聪明学生就读理科班。然后我们必须决定是否能够在两年或三年内,完成大学先修班的课程。学习的最高峰就是能够被我们当时拥有的大学所接纳。” 她指出,分流制度就像漏斗一样“在我们被分配源流、被过滤、被灌输以及重挫之前,所以它就像漏斗一样,将范围不断地缩小、再缩小” 。他甚至打趣说,曾经对他的本科学生说道,随便丢块石头就可以打中一名大学生。 歧视从分流制度开始就有了 她庆幸自己的学生生涯简单明了,但也感叹弟弟就没这么幸运了。“我的学校生涯远没有我弟弟来的复杂,他是普通源流和快捷源流制度落实后的最早一批学生。”她说,当弟弟被送入普通源流时,有许多人哭泣和咬牙切齿。而无论官员们如何削减时间,“普通”是不普通的,因为它意味着需要完成五年的中学生涯,而不是四年。 默乐表示,自从落实小学的天才教育计划(Gifted Education Programme)以及双语教学1/2/3后,已经出现了很多差异。普通源流的教育再被分为学术和工艺班,而普遍上认为普通(技术)源流接收了无论是成绩或性格都是最差的学生。 “现在,小学有基础和标准科目,不久,中学也会有三个水平的学科选项。我的侄儿将在2021年成为第一批根据小六会考(PSLE)选读不同程度的科目。我的弟弟和我都不知道,成为教育系统的白老鼠到底是好还是坏。” 她披露,教育部长王乙康宣布的最新变动,旨在消除自他弟弟那个时代开始,就没有消失过的分流制度歧视心态。尽管这种情况在最近,仍然获得媒体不断报导有关前普通源流学生的成功人生,并赞颂教育节奏缓慢的优点。但是为了取得平衡,她促请媒体也能一视同仁地对待前快捷源流的学生,报导一些他们的失败事迹。“这至少说明,并非有好的开始,就能保障未来光明前程。”…

曾因“做爱只需小空间”论遭挞伐 杨莉明如今认为“不该那么说”

2013年,政府推出“育儿优先配屋计划”,要求首次申请购屋者,必须已怀孕,或至少有一名16岁以下的新加坡籍孩子。 回溯2016年10月,时任总理公署高级政务部长杨莉明,接受《海峡时报》采访,针对有国人认为,必须先有房子才能生孩子,杨莉明一语惊人,作出奇葩回应:“做爱只需要很小的空间”(You need a very small space to have sex)。 当时,她指出,新加坡人的感情观与西方有别,在这里是男女相恋、男的求婚后,双方就计划结婚和准备买房子;但欧美国家可能是相恋后当晚“就造人”。 倘若一对夫妇表明计划两年内生育,但他们希望先拿到房子?…