China and Hong Kong flags (Photo by TungCheung from Shutterstock).

Hong Kongers have delivered a clarion call for change over the last fortnight with a landslide local election defeat for the government and more than one in ten hitting the streets peacefully on Sunday — but will Beijing listen?
Monday marks the sixth month anniversary of a movement that has upended the semi-autonomous Chinese hub’s reputation for stability and blanketed its streets with unprecedented scenes of political violence.
But the last two weeks has seen a dramatic drop-off in clashes and vandalism — something the city’s pro-Beijing leadership has insisted must be a precursor to any meaningful dialogue.
The question on many lips now is whether chief executive Carrie Lam — and Beijing — will take the opportunity to reach out before anger explodes once more.
“Ignoring our voices will only make the snowball get bigger and bigger and there will be consequences to that,” Bonnie Leung, a prominent figure within the pro-democracy movement’s more moderate wing, told AFP.
The rare period of calm began in the run up to city-wide local polls in late November — the only election with universal suffrage.
Millions turned out tipping pro-establishment parties out of office and flipping all but one of the city’s 18 local councils to the pro-democracy camp.
The vote shattered government claims that a “silent majority” opposed the protests.
Then on Sunday the city witnessed its largest mass rally in months with organisers estimating some 800,000 people turned out, a vivid illustration of the public frustration that still seethes under the surface.
The rally, which received rare permission, was almost entirely peaceful. Small fires were lit outside two major courts and police pepper sprayed bystanders during an argument.
But no tear gas was fired — the first time a mass rally has been smoke free since the middle of August.
800,00 people ‘still a very, very large number’
Jimmy Sham, from rally organiser the Civil Human Rights Front, said the ball was now firmly in the government’s court.
“We have to remind the SAR government that 800,000 people is still a very, very large number,”  he told reporters.
“Carrie Lam should listen to our Hong Kongers’ demand as soon as possible,” he added.
Semi-autonomous Hong Kong has been battered by increasingly violent demonstrations in the starkest challenge the city has presented to Beijing since its 1997 handover from Britain.
Millions have marched in protests fuelled by years of growing fears that authoritarian China is stamping out the city’s liberties.
The movement’s demands include an independent inquiry into the police’s handling of the protests, an amnesty for those arrested, and fully free elections.
But there is little sign Lam is willing to budge.
Since the electoral drubbing, her administration has made vague commitments to listen to people’s demands, but no concrete concessions.
Beijing has stuck by her even as she languishes with record low approval ratings and the city police force’s reputation takes a hammering.
The movement’s more radical wing — which has embraced violent tactics — appears to have faded into the background for now.
Hardcore protesters had vowed to restart widespread travel disruptions at dawn on Monday if there was no response from Lam. But the threats did not emerge.
‘We still have plans’
On LIHKG, a Reddit-like web forum that serves as a virtual command centre for frontliners, discussion abounded on whether a resumption of tactics that disrupted ordinary Hong Kongers for much of October and November might backfire.
“Many people think the dawn action has devolved into just disturbing residents while having no effect pressuring the government,” one popular post read, referring to the tactic of paralysing the transport network.
Some are looking to more traditional labour action.
Mung Siu-tat, head of Hong Kong’s pro-democracy Federation of Trade Unions, said more than 30 newly founded unions have reached out for help in recent weeks.
“Quite a number of them are formed by white-collar workers, professionals and executives, who in the past might find it less necessary to unionise but have been politically awakened by the movement,” Mung told AFP.
Arrests skyrocketed in October and early November, especially after thousands of more hardline activists were surrounded by police on a university campus.
“The scale (of violence) may go down a bit because of the massive arrests over the last few weeks,” political analyst Dixon Wong told AFP.
But there are growing fears unrest may return if Lam and Beijing do not offer some sort of olive branch.
On Sunday evening, organisers called on marchers to go home, one black-clad protester took off his mask.
“You have been leading marches for 30 years but what have you achieved?” he shouted.
“We still have plans for a lot of things we want to do for Hong Kong.”
— AFP

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

DPM Teo Chee Hean’s push for White Paper’s endorsement

By Sharon Ng The Population White Paper is an objective and balanced…

MOM: Productivity declined for the first time in a decade

For the first time in at least 10 years, Singapore’s labour productivity…

徐顺全录制福建话视频总结国民辛酸

民主党秘书长徐顺全在今日发表一段视频,以福建话和选民对话,谈及生活成本、公积金领取入息年限延迟、公共组屋政策、部长高薪、税务收费调涨等,都是息息相关,让人民喘不过气来,但行动党政府却还要国民感恩。 他说,过去没有网络没有手机,但如今有网络之便利,希望透过视频来和民众沟通解说民主党的理念,请大家对国民面对的困境评评理。 “大学研究显示,单身老人需要至少1千3、400元才过活,那我问你,你一个月有多少钱用呢?” 他说,新加坡有75巴仙老人一个月的公积金不到500元,为何老人不够钱用? “以前行动党政府声称公共组屋价格是不会下跌的,吴作栋、马宝山和李显龙都讲过房价会一直涨,”结果大家想买房养老,打算退休后卖掉拿钱来用。 但实际上公共组屋屋契只有99年,即便国家发展部长黄循财也得承认组屋到期就得还给政府,没有任何价值;房屋中介也会告诉你超过3、40年代老房很难卖出。即便要拿钱出来用,也要先还公积金,每个月才拿一些来用。 ”再者,公积金领取年限也被延迟到65岁,而且也不能一次领完,政府还死死扣住会员的钱。“ 徐顺全说,即便是年长者的儿孙也有自己的生活负担,补习、日常生手费都感到压力。他认为,政府理应对于照顾年长者负起责任,他们过去为国家作出贡献,但老了就是”你死你的事“,这是没道理的。 ”2015年大选时,李显龙总理说他会照顾老人家,但是选举后什么倒要起价,还叫人民要勒紧裤头,奶粉买便宜的就好、菜饭吃三块钱就好,但是他们叫人民吃、用便宜的,却要自己的薪水一直增加。“ 徐顺全提起吴作栋曾说部长薪水还不够;至于新晋的政治人才律政高级政务部长唐振辉每月薪水五万元,也抱怨薪水不够用,因为还要照顾孩子和父母。 ”如果他五万月薪都不够,那么老百姓一个月五千块不是死定了?“ 有些老人家从早到晚做工做到死,如果不工作就没收入,乃至有些年长者走投无路选择轻生,在2017年就有约129名老人自杀的高记录,为何我们的社会变成这样?…