The diversification of Singapore’s workforce is a crucial step for businesses in “managing concentration risks” and maintaining “business continuity”, said Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing.
Speaking at a bicentennial commemoration dinner organised by the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SCCCI) at the Shangri-La Hotel on Tue (3 Dec), Chan added that businesses in Singapore should continue to develop fair and progressive employment practices by investing in and developing the local workforce.
Simultaneously, Chan said that businesses should also step up its efforts in integrating foreign workers with the local society.
“As our multicultural social norms can be rather unfamiliar to foreign employees, it is important that businesses also play a part in integrating them into our companies and into our society,” he said.
“While we may not have a sufficiently long shared history or common ancestry to define our national identity, we can instead take pride and believe that we can all have a forward-looking identity based on a set of common values,” Chan added.
Employers must thus find a way to bridge the gulf between foreign employees and their local counterparts and Singapore society as a whole, he stressed.
Singapore, added Chan, needs to move forward cautiously in terms of economic openness as “the winds of globalisation weaken”.
“To create good jobs for Singaporeans, we will need to continue to diversify, stay open to trade and investments and play our part to uphold a rules-based and integrated global trading system.
“Our interests are best served by remaining open to economic relations with all countries and not advocating for policies favouring any particular country … Our value to the world is to be a principled partner to all, someone the rest of the world can trust because we mean what we say, and we say what we mean,” said Chan.
Protectionism impractical for S’pore’s progress, foreign talent still integral in developing local technology: Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing
Previously, Chan said that insular, “protectionist” measures against skilled foreign workers will not serve Singapore’s growth in the long run as an economy that has long thrived on an “open-door” policy, particularly in light of a global shortage of tech talent supply.
Responding to a supplementary question by West Coast GRC Member of Parliament Patrick Tay regarding whether whether there are, or whether there will be, controls in place in the Tech@SG initiative to “ensure that Singaporean PMEs are not compromised or prejudiced against”, Chan said that while the government “will never stop putting Singaporeans at the heart of everything we do”, Singapore “will almost certainly be left behind” if the Republic refuses to absorb skilled foreign workers at this point.
Citing countries such as France and Thailand that have rolled out special visa programmes for skilled tech professionals from abroad, Chan said that Singapore only has “a small window to build a critical mass of high-end professionals, start-ups and companies” in light of such competition.
“There will only be a few such nodes globally. How we do today will decide whether we make it as a tech hub, or not,” he stressed.
Tay, a People’s Action Party (PAP) member and an assistant secretary-general of NTUC, suggested that the government’s focus ought to be on helping and assisting Singaporeans, especially “amidst a sense of uncertainty and a quite dismal outlook in terms of employment and job market”.
Chan replied that “it is precisely because of the uncertainties with the economic outlook that we have stepped up our gears to make sure that we build the next generation of companies in this sector”.
“At this point in time, I would say that this forms part of our surgical measures to help companies transform and expand their market presence,” he added.
Chan noted that while Singapore’s economic growth rate is currently being dragged down by the global electronics downturn, the wholesale and retail trade, and some of the engineering sectors, the Republic’s financial services, the ICT sector, and many of the high tech industries are thriving.
“This is why we must make sure that when we lift the bottom, we must never cap the top,” adding that government programmes such as Tech@SG will give local firms “the best possible chance to succeed, and will not make them lose out to other companies from other countries who are competing for global talent”.
When asked by Tay as to whether MTI will consider expanding such initiatives for skilled foreign workers to other sectors such as finance, Chan said that while the government is open to such a prospect, he clarified that such programmes will not apply to S-Pass and E-Pass holders.
“We are not even talking about the average EP people … We are talking about people who can manage programmers by the hundreds and thousands,” he said, adding that such workers are expected to have expertise in managing “global teams”.
Last year, Chan said that the Government wants to encourage a shift towards employing more higher value-added foreign workers (i.e, foreign PMETs).
Noting that raising the skill level of foreigners in Singapore is a knotty issue, as Singaporeans worry it will intensify competition for good jobs, Chan said that the answer is to ensure locals are quality workers, too.
“We cannot dumb everybody down, right? That’s why we work so hard to move our people up.”
Some of the “higher value-added” foreign PMETs identified are those in IT, wealth management and biotechnology areas. Chan hopes these foreign PMETs would help boost Singapore’s capabilities in those areas.
At the same time, companies here which employ such foreign professionals should help transfer expertise to locals, Chan suggested.
“I’ve no problem employing the high-skilled foreigners to come here – we have done that ever since the 1960s – but there must be a process of localisation whereby my own domestic workers, my own local workforce, can progress,” he added.
When asked about the balance of foreign vs local workers in Singapore, he said that while there is “no magic number”, where we are “at the balancing point now is about one-third (foreigners), two-thirds (locals).”
Proportion of PMET retrenchment hits all-time high as number of foreigners on S-Pass increases
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Manpower’s latest labour market report in Mar revealed that Professionals, Managers, Executives and Technicians (PMETs) accounted for a staggering 79.3 per cent of retrenched residents in the fourth quarter of 2018.
This brings the total figure for retrenched local PMETs to 75.8 per cent of all retrenchments for 2018, a record level since such data was first published by MOM in 2006. In 2017, it was 72 per cent.
Some 58 per cent of retrenched residents had degrees, while 19.9 per cent held diplomas. The bulk of the individuals who were retrenched were aged 40 to 49 (34 per cent) and 50 and over (33.6 per cent).

The industries with mass retrenchment exercises tend to be dominated by PMETs, according to MOM.
According to NTUC assistant chief Tay, many staff who were laid off in such sectors last year “are in the executive and technician roles”.
Observers said PMETs are now also vulnerable to uncertainties brought upon by local and global economic trends, and more needs to be done to mitigate the risk of them being displaced.
DBS senior economist Irvin Seah suggested raising the minimum qualifying salary for Employment Pass holders and increasing the length of time firms must advertise jobs on the national jobs portal before they can apply to hire a foreign professional. This would minimise the chances of companies substituting local PMETs with foreign ones, he said.
The number of foreign S-Pass holders grew by 11,100 across all sectors.
“The increase was led by the Services sector, with the highest growth seen in Administrative & Support Services, Food Services, Information & Communications, Professional Services, and Transportation & Storage,” MOM said.

While figures by MOM show that the rate of employment among locals has gone up, the estimated target of 20,000 new citizens and 30,000 Permanent Residents per year as per Singapore’s 6.9 million White Paper on population’s is still in force, which means that many of the former foreign workers who now hold citizenship or permanent resident status will be counted in the figures of employed residents.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

被国大指违反行为准则 郑永年:那是礼节性西式拥抱!

今年9月4日,新加坡国立大学东亚研究所前所长郑永年,透过代表律师许廷芳发表声明,断然否认所有性骚扰的指控,也指警方发出的严厉警告,“并没有构成罪责或事实的裁断”。 新加坡国立大学在本月17日公布内部调查结果,指郑永年在工作会议上,未经同意拥抱东亚所女职员,专业上是不恰当的,违反了国大职员行为守则。 不过,郑永年透过代表律师许廷芳发出声明。他指出,2018年5月30日,与有关女职员会晤,准备送客时,女职员提出想和郑的女儿交朋友。 郑永年告知女儿不在新加坡,女职员露失望之情,他因此礼节性给了她西式拥抱,只用右手拍了她的肩膀,以示安慰和感谢。 郑永年的声明以第一人称叙述:“我的左手臂患有肩周炎,所以我只是用右手臂拍了她的肩膀。”他强调,和女职员没不恰当身体接触。 郑指出,他拒绝担任女职员的博士课程导师,近一年后,后者才报警指控他;郑声称,期间女职员多次主动向他示好,但他都没特别回应。他也指受到女职员在媒体上的人身攻击。 郑永年更批评,国大在声明中,继续对涉案女职员提供支持,“感到遗憾和不解”。 “为什么不保护为它工作20多年的本校教授?难道在这段期间,一个诬告者对我在工作上和精神上造成的困扰和压力,就不在大学考虑的范围内吗?” 郑永年被指控,在2018年5月9日,在一个会议上,将手放在东亚研究所一名女职员的肩膀和头上。 第二项指控:2018年5月30日在会议上,拥抱女职员,并拍臀部 第三项指控:2018年10月在拍群体照时,撑住东亚研究所职员的背部。 郑永年在11月17日的声明中,也反驳女职员的第一和第三项指控不实。对于第一项指控,郑声称当天他们无任何身体接触。至于2018年10月21日集体拍照,当时妻子就站在他与女职员中间。照片显示,他手臂被妻子肩膀遮挡,不可能绕过妻子触碰该职员的背。…

World Day against the death penalty (Singapore)

Support the forum & campaign this Saturday to save the life of Yong Vui Kong.

SDP calls for independent inquiry following irregularities on Polling Day which prevented a woman from voting

In a media release earlier today (16 July), Singapore Democratic Party (SDP)…

41 confirmed cases of locally-transmitted Zika by MOH and NEA

The Ministry of Health (MOH) has confirmed 41 cases of locally-transmitted Zika…