The diversification of Singapore’s workforce is a crucial step for businesses in “managing concentration risks” and maintaining “business continuity”, said Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing.
Speaking at a bicentennial commemoration dinner organised by the Singapore Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry (SCCCI) at the Shangri-La Hotel on Tue (3 Dec), Chan added that businesses in Singapore should continue to develop fair and progressive employment practices by investing in and developing the local workforce.
Simultaneously, Chan said that businesses should also step up its efforts in integrating foreign workers with the local society.
“As our multicultural social norms can be rather unfamiliar to foreign employees, it is important that businesses also play a part in integrating them into our companies and into our society,” he said.
“While we may not have a sufficiently long shared history or common ancestry to define our national identity, we can instead take pride and believe that we can all have a forward-looking identity based on a set of common values,” Chan added.
Employers must thus find a way to bridge the gulf between foreign employees and their local counterparts and Singapore society as a whole, he stressed.
Singapore, added Chan, needs to move forward cautiously in terms of economic openness as “the winds of globalisation weaken”.
“To create good jobs for Singaporeans, we will need to continue to diversify, stay open to trade and investments and play our part to uphold a rules-based and integrated global trading system.
“Our interests are best served by remaining open to economic relations with all countries and not advocating for policies favouring any particular country … Our value to the world is to be a principled partner to all, someone the rest of the world can trust because we mean what we say, and we say what we mean,” said Chan.
Protectionism impractical for S’pore’s progress, foreign talent still integral in developing local technology: Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing
Previously, Chan said that insular, “protectionist” measures against skilled foreign workers will not serve Singapore’s growth in the long run as an economy that has long thrived on an “open-door” policy, particularly in light of a global shortage of tech talent supply.
Responding to a supplementary question by West Coast GRC Member of Parliament Patrick Tay regarding whether whether there are, or whether there will be, controls in place in the Tech@SG initiative to “ensure that Singaporean PMEs are not compromised or prejudiced against”, Chan said that while the government “will never stop putting Singaporeans at the heart of everything we do”, Singapore “will almost certainly be left behind” if the Republic refuses to absorb skilled foreign workers at this point.
Citing countries such as France and Thailand that have rolled out special visa programmes for skilled tech professionals from abroad, Chan said that Singapore only has “a small window to build a critical mass of high-end professionals, start-ups and companies” in light of such competition.
“There will only be a few such nodes globally. How we do today will decide whether we make it as a tech hub, or not,” he stressed.
Tay, a People’s Action Party (PAP) member and an assistant secretary-general of NTUC, suggested that the government’s focus ought to be on helping and assisting Singaporeans, especially “amidst a sense of uncertainty and a quite dismal outlook in terms of employment and job market”.
Chan replied that “it is precisely because of the uncertainties with the economic outlook that we have stepped up our gears to make sure that we build the next generation of companies in this sector”.
“At this point in time, I would say that this forms part of our surgical measures to help companies transform and expand their market presence,” he added.
Chan noted that while Singapore’s economic growth rate is currently being dragged down by the global electronics downturn, the wholesale and retail trade, and some of the engineering sectors, the Republic’s financial services, the ICT sector, and many of the high tech industries are thriving.
“This is why we must make sure that when we lift the bottom, we must never cap the top,” adding that government programmes such as Tech@SG will give local firms “the best possible chance to succeed, and will not make them lose out to other companies from other countries who are competing for global talent”.
When asked by Tay as to whether MTI will consider expanding such initiatives for skilled foreign workers to other sectors such as finance, Chan said that while the government is open to such a prospect, he clarified that such programmes will not apply to S-Pass and E-Pass holders.
“We are not even talking about the average EP people … We are talking about people who can manage programmers by the hundreds and thousands,” he said, adding that such workers are expected to have expertise in managing “global teams”.
Last year, Chan said that the Government wants to encourage a shift towards employing more higher value-added foreign workers (i.e, foreign PMETs).
Noting that raising the skill level of foreigners in Singapore is a knotty issue, as Singaporeans worry it will intensify competition for good jobs, Chan said that the answer is to ensure locals are quality workers, too.
“We cannot dumb everybody down, right? That’s why we work so hard to move our people up.”
Some of the “higher value-added” foreign PMETs identified are those in IT, wealth management and biotechnology areas. Chan hopes these foreign PMETs would help boost Singapore’s capabilities in those areas.
At the same time, companies here which employ such foreign professionals should help transfer expertise to locals, Chan suggested.
“I’ve no problem employing the high-skilled foreigners to come here – we have done that ever since the 1960s – but there must be a process of localisation whereby my own domestic workers, my own local workforce, can progress,” he added.
When asked about the balance of foreign vs local workers in Singapore, he said that while there is “no magic number”, where we are “at the balancing point now is about one-third (foreigners), two-thirds (locals).”
Proportion of PMET retrenchment hits all-time high as number of foreigners on S-Pass increases
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Manpower’s latest labour market report in Mar revealed that Professionals, Managers, Executives and Technicians (PMETs) accounted for a staggering 79.3 per cent of retrenched residents in the fourth quarter of 2018.
This brings the total figure for retrenched local PMETs to 75.8 per cent of all retrenchments for 2018, a record level since such data was first published by MOM in 2006. In 2017, it was 72 per cent.
Some 58 per cent of retrenched residents had degrees, while 19.9 per cent held diplomas. The bulk of the individuals who were retrenched were aged 40 to 49 (34 per cent) and 50 and over (33.6 per cent).

The industries with mass retrenchment exercises tend to be dominated by PMETs, according to MOM.
According to NTUC assistant chief Tay, many staff who were laid off in such sectors last year “are in the executive and technician roles”.
Observers said PMETs are now also vulnerable to uncertainties brought upon by local and global economic trends, and more needs to be done to mitigate the risk of them being displaced.
DBS senior economist Irvin Seah suggested raising the minimum qualifying salary for Employment Pass holders and increasing the length of time firms must advertise jobs on the national jobs portal before they can apply to hire a foreign professional. This would minimise the chances of companies substituting local PMETs with foreign ones, he said.
The number of foreign S-Pass holders grew by 11,100 across all sectors.
“The increase was led by the Services sector, with the highest growth seen in Administrative & Support Services, Food Services, Information & Communications, Professional Services, and Transportation & Storage,” MOM said.

While figures by MOM show that the rate of employment among locals has gone up, the estimated target of 20,000 new citizens and 30,000 Permanent Residents per year as per Singapore’s 6.9 million White Paper on population’s is still in force, which means that many of the former foreign workers who now hold citizenship or permanent resident status will be counted in the figures of employed residents.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Five new cases of Covid-19 infection; Four from cluster of private dinner function

As of 5 March 2020, 12 pm, the Ministry of Health (MOH)…

民众积极举报危险驾驶 交警罚单五年增1.5倍

交警接到有关不良驾驶行为的投报越来越多,根据公民反馈而发出的罚单在五年内增加了1.5倍。 接受《海峡时报》访问时,交警透露,去年透过民众举报,一共发出了2500张罚单。而2014年,交警发出的罚单只有1700张。 交警发出的罚单从2015年的15万2000增加到去年的18万1000张。 总的来说,交警在2018年接到1万8500份民众的反馈函,这个数量是2014年的两倍,2014年接到的反馈函有多达6千900张。 透过反馈门户网站投报 交警发言人表示,民众投报资讯多数是取自2014年开始推出的新加坡警察部队“道路使用者电子反馈”门户网站。 他补充说,较为突出的常见违规行为包括了有超速行驶、闯红灯和危险或鲁莽驾驶。 他指出,“交警欢迎民众作出有关违反交通规矩的投报,这样有助于保障所有公路使用者的安全。” 人民设立社媒群组 近年来,社交媒体上也出现了一些与道路安全相关的群组。他们使用车辆仪表板摄像头录下不负责任的驾驶者、行人和其他交通使用者的不当行为。 其中一个类似的群组是脸书专页Road.sg,拥有将近22万名脸书粉丝。 62岁的Road.sg专页创办人阿罗修斯方表示,这个网页收到约10个有关危险驾驶的视频,其中一半内容涉及驾驶者违规闯红灯。…

OCBC survey: Half of sandwiched gen find it tough supporting parents and children the same time

According to a recent OCBC’s Financial Wellness Index survey, the majority of…

金管局:9月10日起严禁汇款公司提供借贷服务

新加坡金融管理局(MAS)勒令,从今年9月10日起,严禁本地汇款公司提供借贷服务。 根据该局在昨日发出的通知,该禁令不会影响现有贷款,包括重组贷款和再融资贷款。 该局表示,将密切关注持照者进行的贷款活动,如有违例行为将果断采取行动。 去年10月,《海峡时报》报导本地一家在幸运广场经营的持照汇款公司Toast Me,“预支现款”(cash advance)给女佣,引起金管局关注。女佣借贷700新元,将被抽取10巴仙利息,而首次借钱还要扣除70元的费用。 一些业者表示,汇款公司主要功能乃是协助把钱财汇至海外,可能一些公司走漏洞,因为他们不属于律政部管制的持照借贷公司。 数据显示向持照借贷公司借钱的外籍人士,从2016年的7500人,跃升至2017年上半年的3万5000人。 为保护在本地工作的女佣和外籍人士,政府扩大借贷顶限,外国人的借贷顶限则为,年薪不超过1万元者最多只能借贷1500元;年薪介于1万元至2万元者,最多只能借贷3000元。这项限制可能使得一些接待者转而向非法管道借钱。 至于金管局发出的禁令,更早于将在明年生效的《支付服务法令》(Payment Services Act)。在该法下,严禁任何支付服务提供者如持照汇款公司,发放贷款于个人。…