• About Us
    • Fact Checking Policy
    • Ownership & funding information
  • Volunteer
    • Internship with The Online Citizen
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
    • Submissions Policy
  • Contact Us
The Online Citizen Asia
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
No Result
View All Result
The Online Citizen Asia
No Result
View All Result

Singapore signs with India a more generous CECA than Singapore-China CSFTA

by Correspondent
26/11/2019
in Commentaries, Current Affairs, Politics
Reading Time: 5 mins read
0

PM Lee Signing CECA with Indian PM

In 2009, the China-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (CSFTA) came into force. This is China’s first comprehensive bilateral FTA with an Asian country.
China is said to be Singapore’s largest trading partner while Singapore is China’s largest foreign investor since 2013.
In 2017, Singapore’s cumulative investment in China amounted to S$140 billion while China’s cumulative investment in Singapore amounted to S$36.3 billion.
Under the agreement, both countries are allowed to facilitate the free “movement of natural persons” to each other country. It facilitates temporary entry of natural persons for the purpose of trade while recognising the need to ensure border security and to protect the domestic labour force in the territories of both parties.
In essence, the agreement facilitates the movement of the following people:
(a) Business visitors;
(b) Contractual services suppliers; or
(c) Intra-corporate transferees.
Under the agreement, Singapore will allow a Chinese business visitor to stay for a period of up to 60 days with extension for further 30 days. This is for Chinese holders of 5-year multiple journey visa. For holders of all other visas, Singapore will grant the right to temporary entry for a period of up to 30 days, which may be extended for a further 30 days.
In the case of contractual services suppliers, the person must have been a PMET employee of the service supplier for at least 1 year preceding the date of their application for admission. Entry is limited to 90 days with possibility for a further extension of up to 90 days, provided the total does not exceed 180 days or the length of the service contract, whichever is shorter. That is, the maximum stay allowed in Singapore is 6 months for Chinese PMET on contract to provide a service in Singapore by his or her service supplier in China.
For intra-corporate transferees, the person must have been in the prior employ of their firms outside Singapore for a minimum of 1 year preceding the date of their application for admission. Their stay is limited to 2 years but can be extended for periods of up to 3 additional years each time, for a total term of not more than 8 years.
Singapore more generous to India
In contrast, Singapore is more generous to India when comes to CECA.
Under CECA, Indian business visitors with a 5-year multiple journey visa are granted temporary entry for a period of up to two months with further extension for another. Those with less than 5-year multiple journey visa are granted temporary entry for a period of up to one month.
For contractual services suppliers and intra-corporate transferees, the terms are similar to that of CSFTA. The only difference is that for CECA’s intra-corporate transferees, they must have been employed by the company for not less than 6 months before he or she can be qualified for the transfer to the host country.
However, in the case of CECA, there is an additional category stipulated in the agreement (Article 9.5) for the so-called “long-term temporary entry” professionals:

Each Party shall grant temporary entry and stay for up to one year or the duration of contract, whichever is less, to a natural person seeking to engage in a business activity as a professional, or to perform training functions related to a particular profession, including conducting seminars, if the professional otherwise complies with immigration measures applicable to temporary entry, on presentation by the natural person concerned of:
(a) Proof of nationality of the other Party;
(b) Documentation demonstrating that he or she will be so engaged and describing the purpose of entry, including the letter of contract from the (business) party engaging the services of the natural person in the host Party (country); and
(c) Documentation demonstrating the attainment of the relevant minimum educational requirements or alternative credentials.

In other words, the professional is essentially contracted to work in the host country for up to 1 year. Since nothing is said in the agreement denying the professional’s renewal of his or her contract, it is presumed that he or she can continue to work in the host country to “finish up” the contracted work as long as the contract is continually renewed by the the business party who is actively engaging the professional in the host country.
CECA also specified 127 different occupations that the professional can engage in the host country as long as they have equivalent degrees conferred by institutions in India and Singapore.
And under CECA, intra-corporate transferees as well as “long-term temporary entry” professionals are allowed to bring in their spouses or dependants into the host country. They are allowed to “work as managers, executives or specialists, subject to the relevant licensing, administrative and registration requirements”.
“Such spouses or dependants can apply independently in their own capacity (and not necessarily as accompanying spouses or dependants) and shall not be barred by the Party granting them the right to work from taking up employment in a category other than that of managers, executives, or specialists solely on the ground that they as the accompanying spouses or dependants are already employed in its territory as managers, executives or specialists,” CECA stated.
In other words, the spouses or dependants can work in non-PMET jobs in the host country.
Clauses relating to the employment of “long-term temporary entry” professionals as well as employment of spouses or dependants are not found in the same chapter (“movement of natural persons”) in CSFTA. Only CECA has them.
So, in summary, the main difference pertaining to the “movement of natural persons” chapter between the 2 agreements is:-
CECA:

CSFTA:

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Subscribe
Connect withD
Login
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
Notify of
I allow to create an account
When you login first time using a Social Login button, we collect your account public profile information shared by Social Login provider, based on your privacy settings. We also get your email address to automatically create an account for you in our website. Once your account is created, you'll be logged-in to this account.
DisagreeAgree
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Recent Posts

  • PM Lee hopes Govt can decide on tudung issue by National Day Rally — but netizens say “S’poreans never against them wearing tudung”
  • Roy Ngerng raises over S$125,000 over 7 days of fund raising to pay for PM Lee’s defamation damage
  • China’s environmental data: The world’s biggest polluter in numbers
  • S’pore, Hong Kong finalising details to start air travel bubble, says Minister Ong Ye Kung
  • Another fallen tree at Sungei Api Api; PUB assets damaged by irresponsible town council
  • Myanmar protesters throw red paint in the streets as death toll mounts
  • 27 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 1 case in the community
  • Enterprise SG sees opportunities for SG firms to invest in India, thanks to CECA

Trending posts

Ho Ching shares not 1, not 2, but 7 Facebook posts by Chan Chun Sing in a row within 15 minutes

Ho Ching shares not 1, not 2, but 7 Facebook posts by Chan Chun Sing in a row within 15 minutes

Just stop with the charade; Chan is PAP’s preferred PM successor

FB post criticising Minister Chan Chun Sing’s leadership skills re-emerges in light of recent 4G leadership discussion

Petition emerges rejecting Chan Chun Sing as next PM after DPM Heng Swee Keat announced resignation

Ho Ching now shares 13 Facebook posts by Lawrence Wong consecutively within 6 minutes

MP Poh Li San explains to media why RSAF Super Puma was replaced with Airbus H225M

Netizens still prefer Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam as PM successor; not confident in current options

Roy Ngerng raises over S$110,000 over 6 days of fund raising to pay for PM Lee’s defamation damage

A look into alternative parties’ positions on PAP’s failed Prime Minister succession plan

Load More
November 2019
MTWTFSS
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 
« Oct   Dec »
  • About Us
  • Volunteer
  • Donation
  • Subscription
  • Letter submission
  • Contact Us

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

No Result
View All Result
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Commentaries
    • Comments
  • Current Affairs
    • Malaysia
    • Indonesia
    • China
    • ASEAN
    • Asia
    • International
  • Finance
    • Economics
    • Labour
    • Property
    • Business
  • Community
    • Civil Society
    • Arts & Culture
    • Consumer Watch
    • NGO
  • Politics
    • Parliament
    • Transport
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Housing
  • Law & Order
    • Legislation
    • Court Cases
  • Lifestyle
    • Travel
  • Subscribers login

© 2006 - 2021 The Online Citizen

wpDiscuz
0
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
| Reply