PM Lee Signing CECA with Indian PM

In 2009, the China-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (CSFTA) came into force. This is China’s first comprehensive bilateral FTA with an Asian country.
China is said to be Singapore’s largest trading partner while Singapore is China’s largest foreign investor since 2013.
In 2017, Singapore’s cumulative investment in China amounted to S$140 billion while China’s cumulative investment in Singapore amounted to S$36.3 billion.
Under the agreement, both countries are allowed to facilitate the free “movement of natural persons” to each other country. It facilitates temporary entry of natural persons for the purpose of trade while recognising the need to ensure border security and to protect the domestic labour force in the territories of both parties.
In essence, the agreement facilitates the movement of the following people:
(a) Business visitors;
(b) Contractual services suppliers; or
(c) Intra-corporate transferees.
Under the agreement, Singapore will allow a Chinese business visitor to stay for a period of up to 60 days with extension for further 30 days. This is for Chinese holders of 5-year multiple journey visa. For holders of all other visas, Singapore will grant the right to temporary entry for a period of up to 30 days, which may be extended for a further 30 days.
In the case of contractual services suppliers, the person must have been a PMET employee of the service supplier for at least 1 year preceding the date of their application for admission. Entry is limited to 90 days with possibility for a further extension of up to 90 days, provided the total does not exceed 180 days or the length of the service contract, whichever is shorter. That is, the maximum stay allowed in Singapore is 6 months for Chinese PMET on contract to provide a service in Singapore by his or her service supplier in China.
For intra-corporate transferees, the person must have been in the prior employ of their firms outside Singapore for a minimum of 1 year preceding the date of their application for admission. Their stay is limited to 2 years but can be extended for periods of up to 3 additional years each time, for a total term of not more than 8 years.
Singapore more generous to India
In contrast, Singapore is more generous to India when comes to CECA.
Under CECA, Indian business visitors with a 5-year multiple journey visa are granted temporary entry for a period of up to two months with further extension for another. Those with less than 5-year multiple journey visa are granted temporary entry for a period of up to one month.
For contractual services suppliers and intra-corporate transferees, the terms are similar to that of CSFTA. The only difference is that for CECA’s intra-corporate transferees, they must have been employed by the company for not less than 6 months before he or she can be qualified for the transfer to the host country.
However, in the case of CECA, there is an additional category stipulated in the agreement (Article 9.5) for the so-called “long-term temporary entry” professionals:

Each Party shall grant temporary entry and stay for up to one year or the duration of contract, whichever is less, to a natural person seeking to engage in a business activity as a professional, or to perform training functions related to a particular profession, including conducting seminars, if the professional otherwise complies with immigration measures applicable to temporary entry, on presentation by the natural person concerned of:
(a) Proof of nationality of the other Party;
(b) Documentation demonstrating that he or she will be so engaged and describing the purpose of entry, including the letter of contract from the (business) party engaging the services of the natural person in the host Party (country); and
(c) Documentation demonstrating the attainment of the relevant minimum educational requirements or alternative credentials.

In other words, the professional is essentially contracted to work in the host country for up to 1 year. Since nothing is said in the agreement denying the professional’s renewal of his or her contract, it is presumed that he or she can continue to work in the host country to “finish up” the contracted work as long as the contract is continually renewed by the the business party who is actively engaging the professional in the host country.
CECA also specified 127 different occupations that the professional can engage in the host country as long as they have equivalent degrees conferred by institutions in India and Singapore.
And under CECA, intra-corporate transferees as well as “long-term temporary entry” professionals are allowed to bring in their spouses or dependants into the host country. They are allowed to “work as managers, executives or specialists, subject to the relevant licensing, administrative and registration requirements”.
“Such spouses or dependants can apply independently in their own capacity (and not necessarily as accompanying spouses or dependants) and shall not be barred by the Party granting them the right to work from taking up employment in a category other than that of managers, executives, or specialists solely on the ground that they as the accompanying spouses or dependants are already employed in its territory as managers, executives or specialists,” CECA stated.
In other words, the spouses or dependants can work in non-PMET jobs in the host country.
Clauses relating to the employment of “long-term temporary entry” professionals as well as employment of spouses or dependants are not found in the same chapter (“movement of natural persons”) in CSFTA. Only CECA has them.
So, in summary, the main difference pertaining to the “movement of natural persons” chapter between the 2 agreements is:-
CECA:

CSFTA:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

近百患者与武吉班让综合交通中心感染群有关! 淡马亚吁民众勿惊惶

日前《海峡时报》报导指出,近100名冠病确诊者,与武吉班让综合交通中心感染群有关联! 消息震惊人民,不过传染病学亚太学会会长淡马亚教授安抚民心,敦促人民勿惊惶,提醒我国的检测和专业都属全球顶级,过去也曾确认接触者,迅速阻断传播链。 上月中旬,武吉班让综合交通中心出现感染群,其中包括巴士车长和巴士转换站职员,在确诊后,为确保能够及时控制感染群,本地约1万1千名公共交通业员工均接受冠病检测。 当局在7月23日至8月5日之间于七个地点展开拭子检测,包括两个巴士车厂和两处住所。 截至目前,已逾3700名公交员工和承包商当中,有六人的聚合酶链式反应(PCR)冠病检测呈阳性,卫生部已分别在7月24日、30日和8月6日公布这六起病例。这六人的血清检测也呈阳性,相信他们是在早前受感染。 另有89人的血清检测呈阳性,但PCR检测呈阴性,这意味着他们曾经染病并已康复,不会再传播病毒。这89人当中,有12人之前住在宿舍,惟当局未透露他们的工作岗位。 淡马亚表示,新加坡公共卫生当局在使用血清检测的经验和专业都属于世界顶级,曾在三月初,透过血清检测出第83例和91例,并快速地将两个无关联的感染群连在一起,才能迅速断开传播链。 “我们敦促居民勿惊惶。新加坡公共卫生当局也正利用血清检测确定接触者,而且我国一直在这方面都是领先于其他国家。” 因此,针对武吉班让的情况,相信透过血清检测获得类似的结果。 他也呼吁民众应该时刻留意自己的身体状况,并保持良好的卫生习惯,一旦出现急性呼吸系统症状,或突然发烧或失去味觉或嗅觉,应立即前往公共卫生防范诊所(PHPC)就医,接受检测,并告知医生曾到访的地点。 此外,他也要求新加坡政府应该公开其测试结果,并在防范策略上保持透明,让公众理解,以遏制病毒的传播。 “我们相信,新加坡人民定能够在这一战中取得成功。”

Singaporean reminded to stay vigilant in light of recent terrorist attacks around the world

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) has issued a reminder to Singaporeans…

Founders’ Memorial to be built at Bay East Garden

In a press release today (19 Oct), the Founders’ Memorial committee has…

欢庆佳节非法燃放烟火 网民:招警察找上门妙招?

欢庆屠妖节,居民在公共组屋区内燃放烟花,烟花射程超过12层楼,十分接近住宅单位,令人看得胆战心惊。 一段23秒的视频于昨日(10月28日),由署名 Cap Lim的网友上传到SG Road Vigilante脸书群组,网民也在随后迅速转发。 透过视频可见,有人趁着佳节在多层停车场的上方放烟花,但是烟花射程超过12层楼,若波及住宅楼层,后果不堪设想。 视频中也可见居民们纷纷呼吁停止燃放烟火,在视频尾端还会听到类似警察的讯号声。 据网民留言指出,有关事件发生在裕廊西73巷,位于第748座和第746座组屋之间。 网民纷纷讥讽道,“非法燃放烟火,正是吸引警方到来,将你送到法庭的好机会”,“移民与关卡局(ICA)也会找你,到底是如何将烟花运入国的”、“关卡局没有认真工作了”。 根据我国《危险烟火法令》,一旦被证实拥有和燃放危险烟火,可面对不超过两年的监禁、2000元至一万元的罚款,或两者兼施。 去年也有两名男子在屠妖节期间,涉及非法燃放烟火而被逮捕。其中在义顺组屋区放烟火的涉事者,最终被判三个星期的监刑以及罚款5000元。