Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat put forth a motion in Parliament on Tuesday (5 November) calling for Worker’s Party (WP) MPs Sylvia Lim and Low Thia Khiang to recuse themselves from dealing with or having oversight over financial matters of the Aljunied-Huogang Town Council (AHTC) until the court case has ended.
In his long speech calling for the motion, Mr Heng referred to the High Court judgement which found Ms Lim, Mr Low, and WP chief Pritam Singh liable for damages suffered by AHTC, which it has been said made improper payments under their watch amounting to millions.
As Mr Heng delivered his motion, he claimed that Ms Lim and Mr Low had been “dishonest and deceptive and have failed in their duty to the Town Council”.
Mr Heng asked, “Will the Workers’ Party provide the House with any guarantees to uphold accountability and transparency between now and the appeal?”

Millions of dollars

After his lengthy speech in which the DPM recounted in detail the entire saga, Ms Lim sought clarification on a remark made by Mr Heng in his speech. She asked, “In his speech, he mentioned that millions have been lost, if I heard him correctly, and my question for him is, is this a finding of the Court or does this remain an allegation?”
In response, Mr Heng said, “I have mentioned in my speech that the Court’s finding has been very clear that you have contracts worth millions of dollars which have been awarded under circumstances for which it was not quite justified and the findings have been very clear in the auditor’s report, in two auditor’s report, and in the Court findings.”
He continued to explain that he did not exactly say that millions of dollars have been, hesitating slightly and cutting himself off as he flipped through his folders before dropping the point entirely, for now. Instead, he moved on to the other queries raised by Ms Lim.
In the beginning of his speech, Mr Heng said that the motion he has raised is also “about the integrity and character expect of public officials and MPs” and that it “pained” him to move this motion particularly because he has “always had a high regard” for Mr Low Thia Khiang.
He continued, “But there are important questions of public interest to consider. I will mention just a few at the outset. Millions of dollars of public funds are involved”
Immediately after coming back from the break he requested, Mr Heng clarified: “So I checked my file. The exact words that I’ve used is: ‘there are important questions of public interest to consider, I’ll just mention a few at the outset. Millions of dollars in public funds are involved’. That is the exact words that I’ve used.”

Claims that WP has not been transparent

Ms Lim had also asked Mr Heng to clarify his remark on the AHTC not cooperating with the AGO in its investigation. She asked, “The third clarification is he seemed to suggest that we had obstructed the AGO in its work. I hope he can clarify that because I do not think that the AGO actually said anything of that nature.”
She noted that Mr Heng repeatedly said that the AHTC “had hidden documents from auditors which if produced would have revealed the truth”. She asked, “Can he explain what exactly is he talking about?”
On these two points, just before requesting for a break, Mr Heng said, “The fact is there were many documents that were asked for but the town council did not provide but despite that, the AGO has important findings that merited action. So there were documents which we asked for which you did not provide.”
He later added, “Many documents were produced during the Court of Appeal hearing and also the various court procedures and it was only when those emails were produced that we revealed the truth on how FMSS was appointed.”
Later, after coming back from the break, Mr Heng passed on those queries for further clarification to Senior Minister of State Edwin Tong instead who first addressed the issue of documentations that the auditors requested but was not made available.
He said, “They [The Auditors] sought documents in relation to transactions that were entered into after WP took over in the town council. They were not made available. In the following year in 2013, the same qualifiers were made.”
He then quoted from the Price Waterhouse Cooper report that said “no single email on matters in relation to the takeover of the MA and EMSU contract services by FMSS including the termination of CPG, the award of contracts to FMSS, and or FMSS performance of works was given to us for review. Though in our view, such emails ought to exist.”

A question of integrity

There was also a point in the debate when WP MP Png Eng Huat sought clarification for something Mr Heng said about cosignatories on cheques relating to AHTC. he asked, “So is the minister implying that the cheque can be cashed with just one signature even though we set it up so that two signatures must be there before we can the cheque under AHTC?”
Deflecting, Mr Heng said: “Well the WP members have asked a whole series of questions on details but let me get back to why I moved this motion. I moved this motion because this is a question of integrity, this is a question of the way that we deal honestly in parliament with our residents, with the public, and with our fellow town councillors.”
He went on to ask Ms Lim and Mr Low again if they would recuse themselves and if Chairman of the AHTC Mr Faisal Manap will take any action on the matter. He also asked what Secretary General of WP Mr Pritam Singh intends to do given these findings.
Mr Png retorted, “If you say that someone can cash a cheque with one signature instead of two like what we have said, it’s a question of integrity. Come on.”
Mr Tong later spoke on the issue of the cheques, saying, “You just have to look at the summary of the judgement to know that we are not talking about one cheque here or two signatories there. Don’t penny pinch your dime with us.”

The AHTC case

On 11 October, Judge Kannan Ramesh, in his written judgement, ruled that Lim and Low as town councillors had acted in breach of their fiduciary duties to AHTC, reasoning that the breach was evident in the waiver of tender leading to the award of the first managing agent contract to FM Solutions & Services (FMSS).
The waiver, said the judge, was “not justified under the Town Council Financial Rules (TCFR), and that subsequently, Lim and Low had “failed to act in AHTC’s best interests and had acted for extraneous purposes”.
“The evidence shows that there was a clear plan for FMSS to replace the incumbent MA CPG regardless of CPG’s intention as regards the existing MA contract, and that this decision was made by Ms Sylvia Lim and Mr Low Thia Khiang shortly after the 2011 General Elections,” said Justice Kannan.
“There was no urgency of circumstances that would have justified the waiver of tender, particularly since CPG was contractually obliged to continue serving as the MA under the existing MA contract, and the defendants should have held CPG to that contractual obligation, at least for such time as was necessary for a tender to be called,” he added.
As for Mr Singh, the judge said that while “it cannot be said that he has breached his fiduciary duties to AHTC” based on the available evidence, the former had breached his “duties of skill and care” to the Town Council in relation to the award of the first MA contract.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

路透社民调:63巴仙国人认同 网络公开表达政见易惹麻烦

根据路透社发布2018年数码新闻报告显示,我国有63巴仙接受民调调查者认为,公开在网络表达政治意见容易令他们招惹麻烦。 该报告民调探寻何以网络用户减少对脸书依赖,转向如Whatsapp社交媒体获取和分享新闻资讯。报告指出这可能是用户需要一个较安全的管道来自由表达意见,这也是为何信息交流媒体的市场,在较专制国家如土耳其、马来西亚和香港发展更为蓬勃。 例如在土耳其,两年前总统埃尔多安监禁政治对手、让媒体噤声,使得加密式的交流软件如WhatApp在当地更受欢迎。至于马来西亚则在去年通过《假新闻法》,赋权政府惩戒任何被指传播“假新闻”者。 至于我国有63巴仙受访者,则认同在网络表达政治意见回三思而行,因为这可能让自身惹上麻烦。   社交媒体和信息交流媒体如WhatsApp都普遍成为人民分享、发布贴文,甚至新闻传播网站了,这个情况在新加坡更为显见,75巴仙国人几乎都是用智能手机阅览新闻。而且,国人对新闻的信任度并没有受到假新闻或错误信息影响,还比2017年增加至47巴仙。 2018数据新闻报告,根据包括新加坡在内37国、7万4000多名在线消费者展开了调查,探询群众对网络新闻的消费模式。有关报告着重于信任和假信息、新的网络商业模式、新平台和信息应用程序的兴起等课题。 路透社指出,有关的报告显示了新闻业界有“生机”。 有关调查显示,由于在脸书上的发表、帖文和分享新闻有了具体的下降,社交媒体已经开始在美国、英国和法国等一些主要市场中出现。 七成国人靠手机阅览新闻 然而,新加坡的社交媒体使用量却比2017年增加了,达到了63巴仙。 据路透社报道指出,网络新闻网站和社交媒体将继续成为新加坡的主要新闻来源,因为75巴仙人口都是通过智能手机获取新闻。在本地社交媒体平台中,WhatsApp广受人民欢迎,42巴仙受访者表示都使用它来获取新资讯,而脸书仍然是主导者,占了受访者的52巴仙,比前年下降了3巴仙。…

Cyber Security Agency of Singapore to launch ‘Live Savvy with Cybersecurity’ campaign on 11 Feb

The Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA) has informed on Friday (10 Feb)…

新一代公路电子收费系统行车器延至明年启用 2023年开始收费

新一代公路电子收费系统将延至2021年启用,即明年下半年起,驾驶者可将阅卡器更换成与新系统兼容的行车器。 陆路交通局今天(8日)下午发文告表示,鉴于疫情的原因,全球的供应链也受到影响,故原定今年启动的新一代公路电子收费系统将延至2021年开始。 安装行车器(On-Board Unit,简称OBU)的工作预计在明年下半年展开,为期18个月,所有本地注册的车辆都可免费将目前使用的阅卡器更换成新的行车器。 陆交局则在2023年启动新的ERP系统。为了让驾驶者能够驾轻就熟,在启动初期,陆交局将不会改用新的收费方式,而是根据地点收费,并定期根据行车速度和拥堵程度调整收费。 当局也说,改用新系统后,仍会按照现有模式清楚标出收费地点,不过届时会使用体积更瘦小的闸门。