On Tuesday (1 October), National University of Singapore Professor Dr Tommy Koh opined that Singapore is a first world country with third world citizens as many of them don’t have the civic-mindedness that is required out of people in an advanced country.
“I am more critical of Singaporeans than of the Government. Many of our people don’t give a damn for the environment when they should. Many of our people are selfish and unkind. Just look at the way they drive,” explained the Ambassador-at-Large at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
He said this while speaking at the Singapore Bicentennial Conference, conducted at Raffles City Convention Centre. The conference was organised by the Institute of Policy Studies.
During the dialogue, Prof Koh and Bloomberg News editor-in-chief John Micklethwait came together to discuss areas in which the people of Singapore can improve.
Prof Koh expressed that he wants the poverty line in the country to be set higher and raise the wages for workers. He also pointed out that there is a large gap in terms of pay between a company’s top executive and its rank and file employees.
When asked on whether there’s an alternative to capitalism, Prof Koh said that it’s better to ask what kind of capitalism Singapore wants.
He explained that moral capitalism is when businesses consider themselves accountable to both shareholders and the society. They also should show care for the environment, ensure their employees are well taken care, and prioritise gender equality and diversity, Prof Koh said.
“I love Singapore. I would die for Singapore. But are we a perfect people? We are not,” he said.
He added, “But I believe that we can always be better and in the remaining years of my life, I want to dedicate my time, energy to making Singapore an even better place, and Singaporeans an even better people.”
Upon reading Prof Koh’s statement about Singapore, many netizens agreed with him. Commenting in the Facebook page of ST, they said that many people lack civic-mindedness, manners and social etiquette, which can be clearly seen at how they behave in public areas. For instance, how noisy they are in cafes, spitting and throwing rubbish in common places, and many more. Eugene Sim described Singaporeans as “a well educated generation with a barbaric behaviour”.
    
Although a large group of them shared the same opinion as Prof Khor, others blamed foreigners for the Third Class mentality that citizens in Singapore have. They said that the city-state has no more national identity with the amount of foreigners in the country, and “many migrants touted as talents are from countries known to have no respect for personal space and orderliness”. As such, Maevis Lee noted that locals’ lack of civic-mindedness happened due to “new citizens bring their old habits” to Singapore.





On the other hand, some blamed the society and government for how the people in the country are behaving. “Chan ShiJie said “the society & government mould the citizens into only thinking about themselves & not others”, causing them to behave badly in public.
Some opined that Singaporeans are living in a stressful environment with no social protection, long working hours and demanding bosses, causing them to care less about the environment and society. David Firdaus highlighted that “because we are a society blinded by money and material wealth so much that courtesy and manners takes a back seat”.
   

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

政府对非主流媒体处处提防,是天生的恐惧?

两周前,《雅虎新闻》记者Nicholas Yong上载了一篇文章,揭露非主流媒体在采访工作上和政府打交道时,往往会面对各种困难,例如无法第一时间获得重要官方通知、未获通知和邀请出席政府部门的记者会或重要活动。 他诉苦道,主流媒体新闻出街几小时后后,他们才收到官方文告;重要的官方活动亦会以“仅限本地媒体”为由,限制非主流媒体出席。 Nicholas 写道,“还有一次,我们向政府要求预先提供国庆日当天的演说稿–这可是一整年里面最重要的政治演说,但我们却被各个资深官员以“我手头上没有”而拒绝提供。相反地,主流媒体一天前就拿到讲稿了。” 主流与非主流媒体的差别待遇已不是新鲜事,Nicholas也曾提及,前两年的国会新闻采访上,非主流媒体被迫挤在狭窄的国会新闻发布室上,室内禁止携带手机,而且无法第一时间获得演讲稿。反观新加坡报业控股与新传媒记者,却可以获得国会实况。 “今时今日,为什么仍给予主流媒体抢占先机,难道是为了主导论述吗?”他质问。 同样地,本社对于这种厚此薄彼的偏驳,也感同身受。有准证的非主流媒体不会收到政府文告,而且有时这些完整文告也不会上载到政府部门官网,但主流媒体却可以率先报导出街。 举个例子:学术界联署反对《防假消息法》,但是教育部的回应声明,并没有第一时间上载到官方网站上,反而独家给了《海峡时报》。即便到今天,这则教育部声明也没办法在该部官网找到。 然而,有别于《雅虎新闻》获得媒体认证,本社则是注册在新闻与艺术部下的其中一家受监督媒体机构。 本社也曾在去年申请媒体认证,然而却被告知本社不需要取得认证即可报导本地新闻,而要不要发出认证,也取决于政府的斟酌: 如同Nicholas所提,政府真的对主流与非主流媒体有差别待遇,不论对已注册在新闻及艺术部下的媒体如《雅虎新闻》或本社,都有限制?…

CAG, SIA, and STB investing $33.75 million to promote Singapore

Changi Airport Group (CAG), Singapore Airlines (SIA) and Singapore Tourism Board (STB)…

MSM’s one sided story on crane protest.

28 march 2013, HOME released a press statement disputing the report, “Crane…

李智陞反驳乐施会贫富不均指数 指政府政策“已见成效”

昨日,乐施会公布的全球各国缩小贫富不均指数,在157国中,新加坡位列149位,排行倒数第九。不过,我国社会及家庭发展部长李智陞对此作出回应,我国国民拥屋率高、医疗成效领先全球,说明政策是否见效,比国家拨款多少在社会开支更重要。 他认为,应该注重政府政策是否让人民取得实质受惠,例如良好健康、教育、就业和居住权,而不是去“满足一堆指标。” 乐施会的报告指出,新加坡是世界上最富有国家之一,但排名倒数第九,其便于避税的措施乃是部分因素。再者没有定制最低薪资,保障劳工权益不力。对于社会开支仍相对很低- 只有39巴仙花在教育、医疗和社会保障上,不如南韩和泰国,一半开支都花在这三个项目。 对于乐施会的排名,李智陞反驳说,新加坡享有高拥屋率、医疗服务领先全球、学生表现排名佳等例子,说明所推行的政策已取得成效。 ”以低税、低支出就能见成效“ “再者,相比其他经济体,”本地低收入和中位数收入家庭过去10年的收入增长是最快的。“他补充,对比大部分国家,仅以最低税率和较低支出,就能达到成效,才是新加坡的成就。 乐施会指出,我国在医疗上的开支仅占国内生产总值4.6巴仙。但是李智陞引述经济学人智囊单位(EIU)评价的医疗成效排行榜,我国位居全球第二、世界卫生组织医疗系统位列全球第六。 李智陞甚至言道,新加坡人普遍承担的所得税偏低,几乎一半人口不缴任何所得税,但是这些群体却能从政府获得高素质基础建设和较多社会援助。 他也指出,新加坡15岁学生在国际学生评估项目(International Student Assessment,简称PISA),数学、科学和阅读都名列第一,本地最贫穷家庭学生优于表现其他经合组织(OECD)国家。…