Singaporean influencer Sheena Phua’s recent Instastory at the F1 Grand Prix on 21 September drew strong criticism from netizens over her insensitive remark on two Sikh men.
She uploaded a picture of two Sikh men in white turbans sitting in front of her, and captioned it with “Dang! 2 huge obstructions decided to appear out of nowhere”.

Photo Credit: subhasmusic/Instagram
As expected, many online users slammed the Instagram beauty and travel content influencer, who has more than 76,000 followers. This is because they felt that her comments insulted the two men and their religious beliefs.
However, in a later Instastory, Ms Phua apologised for her comment that many deemed as “racist and culturally insensitive”. She also insisted that her intention was not to offend the Sikh community, or any other religion.
She clarified that the “obstructions” that she meant in her previous Instastory was actually “physical obstruction” as both the Sikh men were very tall. As such, they blocked her view from seeing what’s happening in front of her, Ms Phua said.
She also added that her message had been “misinterpreted” and that “this would have been the same were there any other race or gender”.
Photo Credit: Mothership

Sikh association responds in kindness

After reading such a controversial and insensitive message, many would expect the Sikh community in Singapore to seethe in anger. However, the Youth Sikh Association (YSA) took a rather unconventional route to address this issue.
Instead of being furious at Ms Phua, the association decided to reach out to the social media influencer and invited her for a personal tour to a Gurdwara so she can learn more about the Sikh community.
In a Facebook post on 28 September, YSA stated they believe “actions speak louder than words”, justifying the reason why they gave Ms Phua an opportunity to join them on a four-hour visit to the Central Sikh Temple in Towner Road to understand the Sikh religion and community better.
Ms Phua told ST that, “I did some reflection and agreed with (some) people that although the video was not outrightly racist, it was insensitive and had caused a lot of distress to the Sikh community…I decided to take up the YSA’s offer to learn more.”
While at the gurdwara, Ms Phua did not only learn about the Sikh culture and religion, she also did some sewa, or an act of service, by making chapati in the community kitchen.
YSA also stated that when they met the influencer, she shared about “her community and some of her experiences growing up in Singapore.
“By her own admission, she shared that she didn’t know much about the Sikh community. She didn’t have or know of any Sikhs who may have been at school with her,” it added.
After knowing Ms Phua personally, the association pointed out that it’s unfair to penalise her for her initial offensive post given that she was not well-informed about the community that time. “We all have our own experiences that inform what and how much we know about others in our community,” it stated.
Additionally, YSA also mentioned that most of us hope that people will forgive and understand us when we commit an unintended mistake, and reach out to us in friendship.
“Also, don’t we all hope that when we make a mistake and cause unintended offence or hurt, that others will show us empathy, be understanding and forgiving? Better yet, when we make mistakes don’t we all hope that we can expect people will act on their convictions and reach out to us in friendship, as opposed to reacting based on emotions and pointing fingers to blame,” YSA wrote.
In the end of its post, YSA noted that it was grateful towards Ms Phua for making the time to meet the association, and hoped that she enjoyed “what we (YSA) feel was a meaningful experience for all of us.”
It also mentioned that Ms Phua gave them an idea for an initiative that the association plans to take on in the future. “She felt like her, many would also appreciate a less structured visit to a place of worship and learn through conversations and sharing our experiences. We think we just might take this up next year!”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

多多博彩网快速下注出现故障,影响14期开彩结果

多多博彩网的线上快速下注系统出现故障,其系统中将“49”的数字剔除超过一年,影响了共14期的多多开彩结果。 昨日(15日)内政部发表文告,于本月3日接获通报表示新加坡博彩公司出现故障。 该公司表示去年接获公众投诉,发现网上投注系统的电脑快速下注(Quick Pick)选项出现两个故障,其中包括电话、互联网和手机应用的投注方式,但在投注站下注的顾客并不受影响。目前已将两故障修补。 内政部指出对故障严正以待,并且正在针对此事进行调查。 快速下注系统共出现两故障 此次故障一共出现了两次,均发生在快速下注系统。快速下注能够让投注者透过随机的方式选出一组数字,但因系统故障将49排除掉,即指下注的客户在透过快速下注时,只能选择从1至48的数字。 新加坡博彩公司于去年12月18日接到故障通报,并于三天内进行修正。 第二次的故障则是出现在卷式下注,是在维修第一个故障时所发现的,于1月10日向内政部通报。 一般而言,系统卷式下注是必须从1至45选出5个号码。第6个号码以”R”为代号, 电脑将把剩余的40个号码逐个分配作为”R”号码。换言之, 您投注了40组普通下注。…

社论:奉,唯才是举之名

原文:Augustine Low 奉唯才是举之名,推举已故李光耀的儿子为总理。 奉唯才是举之名,总理夫人成为淡马锡的总裁。 只要高举唯才是举的大旗,总理的私人律师可以成为总检察长;行动党议员可以受委副检察长。 以唯才是举之名,高级部长的妻子也可以成为总审计长。 多少年来,藉著唯才是举(meritocracy)的精神,多少上流阶层的子女获得声望最高的奖学金? 又有多少有权势的夫妻档、兄弟家族,立基于精英主义? 几十年来,新加坡始终钟爱着和拥抱唯才是举制度。 1958年,英国社会和工党政治家麦可杨(Michael Young),在他的一本讽刺小说里发明了“Meritocracy”这个词汇。他在2001年,在英国《卫报》一篇抨击英国首相布莱尔的文章,毫不留情地抨击唯才是举制度: “这些精英相信、当然他们也一再被鼓吹,他们凭藉自己的实力才干取得成就。他们会认为自己值得拥有这一切,不免感到沾沾自喜,相比下,他人可能知道他们的成就,只不过是受益于裙带关系、他们是某某人的子女,而不是因为他们的才干。…

“滥用泼马法企图噤声异见” 马律师组织不遵循更正指示

今早(22日),内政部援引《防假消息法》(POFMA),要求马国捍卫自由律师团(LHL)、《网络公民》、雅虎新闻以及新闻工作者韩俐颖,发出更正指示。 事缘内政部指责捍卫自由律师团,在本月16日的新闻稿作出不实指控,称樟宜监狱以残酷和不合法方式处决囚犯。 不过,捍卫自由律师团也很快在今日作出回应,声称坚持立场,且扬言不遵守新加坡政府发出的更正指示,并要求撤回。 文告坚称樟宜监狱内确实曾发生残酷行刑、且若绞绳断裂,则朝囚犯的脖子后方使劲踢断。并指他们的声明是来自前任和现任监狱官员的证据。 “试图干预马国公民在自家土地发言自由” 同时,该律师组织董事梅丽莎(Melissa Sasidaran)也抨击,近期才生效的《防假消息法》备受争议,是欠缺民主和压迫式的法律,国际上都指责该法被用于钳制异见。 “再者,新方对在马国土地发文告的组织,用《防假消息法》发出更正指示,是令人愤慨和无法接受的。新方无权干预马国公民在自家土地发声明的言论自由。” 梅丽莎认为新加坡内政部的做法无疑是要让该组织噤声,避免处决方式的真相公开;他揶揄新加坡政府应学会接受批评。 “他们对于真相和事实没有独断权。这种尝试把管辖权力延伸到马国公民身上的做法,是挑衅、非法的,也违反国际法。” 内政部驳斥指控 内政部驳斥,捍卫自由律师团作出不实指控;并强调政府不遗余力确保执法严格遵守法律程序,而执刑也都有监狱长或一名医生在场等。…

Straits Times showcases retiree who has $1.6m in CPF and advises refunding money taken from CPF for home loans

The Straits Times (ST) published an article today describing how a retiree…