During the inaugural Progress Singapore Party Talk held by Progress Party Singapore on 10 September, renowned economist Yeoh Lam Keong outlined the problem of poverty in Singapore and proposed several necessary reforms that he says will help lift thousands of citizens up from absolute poverty.
Mr Yeoh, who is best known for being the former Chief Economist of GIC, explained that he had conducted an inter-ministerial study to look at poverty in Singapore back in 2007. Throughout the course of conducting this study, Mr Yeoh said, “To my shock and horror, I realised that the position of the poor in Sg was much worse and much more awful than I can imagine. So that struck me.”
He explained that the findings of the study presented to several senior government officials including two Deputy Prime Ministers and several senior ministers and permanent secretaries. While the recommendations put forth were well-received, Mr Yeoh noted that government was slow in implementing some of the recommendations they had opted to take up, thus leaving many gaps till today.
The absolute poor, Mr Yeoh explained, are counted as such when their regular income does not enable them to lead a decent existence and they are unable to cover their basic needs like food, shelter, utilities, medical services, and education. Not being able to meet those needs puts you below the living wage.
“It’s a painful and shameful experience and disgraceful for the rest of society,” Mr Yeoh lamented.
Mr Yeoh pointed out that while Singapore has seen a gradual decrease of absolute poor over the past few years, the latest estimates are that there are around 250,0000 Singaporeans who are absolute poor. That’s about 100,000 to 130,000 or about 7.5-10% of households in Singapore.
Mr Yeoh then noted that one of the recommendations that weren’t taken up back in 2007 was that poverty be measured properly. This is a crucial step because if we don’t define a problem properly and exactly, we cannot design a solution.
Mr Yeoh went on to outline those recommendations which government can take up to adequately help lift Singaporeans out of absolute poverty.

Increase the Welfare Income Supplement (WIS)

According to his estimates, there are about 60,000 to 75,000 households in Singapore which are absolute poor, even after receiving WIS.
Mr Yeoh described WIS as a ‘great scheme’, noting how it started at $150 a month and has increased to $250-$300 a month. Unfortunately, about 60% of that payout goes into CPF, leaving beneficiaries with only $100-$150 in cash each month when they actually need $700-$800 in cash.
“Yes they moved in the right direction, but in my humble opinion, they did very little. And one of the reasons is, I feel, they don’t have a handle on how much they need to raise it because they did not measure it properly,” said Mr Yeoh.
As for Comcare, Mr Yeoh said it is not enough as it only reaches about 40% of those who need it, giving only $250-$300 a month. This only covers about 25% of the gap, said Mr Yeoh. And even if you add in all the other schemes and programmes, that still only covers about one-third of the gap.
Mr Yeoh suggests that the WIS be increased by about $500-$600 in cash. This would automatically raise the median take-home income above the living wage and ensure that basic needs are covered.
Here the economist asked a pointed question of why Singapore, a country with one of the highest per capita GDP in the world, has so many working poor. The reason, he says, lies in a grave policy error on the part of the government.
“The reason is, aside from the normal international reasons like competition from third world or technology, the main reason is actually that for about 20 years, we made a big policy error in Singapore’s growth. We had a goal for growth policy which let in excessive unskilled foreign workers. So we let in, for a period of 20 years, 1.2 million unskilled foreign workers – and they pushed down Singapore’s labour supply and demand, dampened the wages of people right at the bottom.”
Still, Mr Yeoh concedes that the government has “recognised this error”. Since 2010 when policies were introduced to stem the influx of unskilled foreign labour, real wages have been on the rise. However, Mr Yeoh asserts that it would take too long, possibly 10 years, for wages to reach back to the levels of a living wage. In the meantime, what are the poor to do?
Mr Yeoh emphasised, “I feel that because it is a policy error, it is incumbent upon the government to step in and support these people until the wages rise…and therefore support them until we reach that level where they are no longer in poverty.”
This, he says, can be done by increased the WIS payout. It will cost the government an additional $1.7 to $2 billion or 0.45% of GDP which Mr Yeoh insists is “eminently affordable”. He also pointed out that the cost will taper off as more people start to earn a living wage. The government “can afford to pay this on a declining rate over the next 10 years”.

Increase the Silver Support Scheme (SSS)

The conservative estimate for the number of elderly Singaporeans who are absolute poor is 20,000 to 25,000 households, and that figure is set to triple in the next few decades as baby boomers – the largest cohort – ages.
Many baby boomers are poorly educated to begin with, says Mr Yeoh, and they tend to earn low wages. Crucially, while the first half of their careers saw baby boomers earning a middle-income wage in a middle-income country, policy errors have resulted in this generation retiring in one of the most expensive first-world cities on the planet.
“These are people that built modern Singapore with their hands and their blood and sweat and tears. If we cannot find it in ourselves to see that this is a great social injustice that these people should retire in poverty, absolute poverty, there is something deeply wrong with this society,” chided Mr Yeoh.
For the elderly, the government introduced the SSS in 2011 which is a non-contributory pension. In the beginning, the payouts were $200 per month, now it’s about $250 a month. Again, Mr Yeoh says it’s “excellent” that the scheme was introduced but is “way too little”.
Even with the Personal Assistance (PA) scheme and Comcare, about two-thirds of the problem is not being addressed.
Mr Yeoh concedes that SSS is a good scheme and that all we need to do is put in more money. He suggested increasing SSS by about $500 to $600 a month and having PA and Comcare be means-tested for special needs after the SSS payout.
This would raise the income of the retired poor to above $800 per capita per month, thus covering basic needs. This would still only be about two-thirds of the estimated basic income suggested by the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy (LKYSPP) at National University of Singapore in May of $1,379 a month.
For this, the government would have to spend an extra $800 million to $1 billion a year or 0.2% of the GDP. But as the number of retirees triple, the cost would also triple to about $5.6 billion or 0.6% of the GDP by 2050. This, Mr Yeoh says, is also still “eminently affordable”.

Introduce a comprehensive unemployment protection system

For the third category of poor, Mr Yeoh says there are about 25,000 to 35,000 households that make up the unemployed poor.
The economist cautioned that the future will likely see much higher technological unemployment as AI and info-comms technology make more and more professionals and unskilled workers redundant. He also explained that the gig economy also means there will be an increased number of unemployed poor due to global trends, as people jump from contract to contract, leaving people without an income.
He warned, “We are not future-ready for these trends because Singapore is alone is not having any unemployment insurance among EOCD countries”.
Mr Yeoh explained that Singapore needs a “national comprehensive unemployment protection system” that will either insure the unemployed for three month’s wages to give them a chance to secure employment or at the very least allow people to borrow from their own CPF while they are unemployed which they can later pay back once they have a job.
He added, “In absence of an unemployment insurance scheme, surely this is your money, you should have access to it when you are unemployed and need it.”
Singapore needs a comprehensive national unemployment protection system, Mr Yeoh asserted. “We need it because the future is coming at us very fast.”
The additional cost to the government would be, according to Mr Yeoh’s estimates, about 0.3% to 0.4% of the GDP or about $1.6 billion per year. Again, it’s “not much”.

Eliminating the bandwidth problem and other supporting reforms

He also crucially pointed out that these schemes should be automatically given without people having to apply or reapply for assistance. “The fate of our poor is to fall into the chasm”, said Mr Yeoh but making the assistance automatic will prevent that from happening.
It will also eliminate the bandwidth problem – where the poor do not have the focus or concentration to apply for all these schemes when they’re too busy trying to figure out how to get their next meal. He also suggested the elimination of family-based means-testing which he says is a “terrible thing”.
Making these schemes automatic also eliminates the politicisation of welfare, which Mr Yeoh commends the government for taking steps to reform. However, he noted that he doesn’t think the Community Development Council should be administrators and dispensers of welfare. Instead, the onus should be on the ministries. Attaching the dispensation of welfare benefits to a political party is a “slippery slope”, he warned.
“You are hostage to political fortunes and you should not be. It should be based on needs.”
In total, all three reforms would cost the government about $4.5 billion today or about 1% of the GDP. While this might increase by 0.5% of the GDP as more of the population ages, it will also decrease as the working poor become better off. Mr Yeoh then pointed out that Singapore has a structural budget surplus o about 5% of the GDP or about $20 billion.
He then said, “So we have $20 billion to spare but we cannot spend $4.5 billion or $5 billion on our absolute poor?”
Apart from these three major reforms, Mr Yeoh also noted other necessary supplemental and supportive reforms that can be done from creating more decent and affordable subsidised rental flats, having adequate infrastructure and subsidies for universally affordable out of pocket chronic primary healthcare and long-term care, subsidies on educational out of pocket costs, subsidies on public transport for the poor, and leasehold reform.

The government should do the heavy lifting

Wrapping up his presentation, Mr Yeoh said: “The core of absolute poverty – to me, the most painful and shameful form of poverty – can largely be eliminated easily, affordably but needs a few key government reforms.”
“It’s simple. It will make a huge difference to a quarter-million citizens right at the bottom. It will increase social mobility and equal opportunity to these people,” he added.
He then noted that the heavy lifting of eliminating poverty should be done by the government as they have the resources to do so. This will then free up Volunteer Welfare Organisations (VWO) to do the “valued-added” work that involves the human touch of restoring the dignity of the poor.
“Eradicating absolute poverty is a public good, therefore, like building, roads, like building hospitals, like buildings schools. The government needs to do the heavy lifting financially and organisationally. So what are we waiting for?”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dr Lee Wei Ling pays tribute to late LKY and writes that her father would not want to be hero-worshippped

Dr Lee Wei Ling pays tribute to her father, late Founding Minister…

Banks across Singapore will shut down several outlets till 4 May

Anticipating lower footfall due to the more stringent social distancing measures to…

疑涉偷拍男生友人发起联署 吁“体制也应该对男生公平”

近一周来,国立大学学生、校友、民众和非政府组织等,都力挺在国大偷拍风波中的受害女学生马芸。不过网络联署专页change.org,也出现疑似涉事男生Nicholas Lim友人,发动联署呼吁惩处体制“也应该对Nicholas公平些”。 有关联署是在两天前发布,不过至今为止只有33人签名支持。然而,相信是偷拍事件成为近期热门议题,有关声援涉事男生的联署,在社交媒体脸书也获得超过20次的分享。 该联署声明是由名为Gary Yeow的账号发起,文中指出,体制必须公平公正,并不应该“让呼声更响亮的一方掌握话事权”。 Gary Yeow在联署中指出,国大纪律委员会乃是根据过去的先例,处罚涉事男生,国大在这件事上并没有做错,有关惩处机制一直都是这样运作的,认为此事针对Nicholas Lim是不公平的。 国大校方已在22日表示:“由于我们是教育机构,希望给学生机会,所以初犯者在纪律委员会上可能面对不同的处分,但不会直接被开除。” 网传疑似男生声明:感羞愧懊悔 另一方面,在社媒Instagram上,一个署名“flyingcorgi_”的账号,自称代表涉事男生与外界沟通,发表疑似来自男生本人的声明,指男生在这数月以来感到羞愧和懊悔。 “这不是小过错,而是在当下为了满足偷窥欲望做出的愚蠢行为,我对于我该受谴责的行为真诚道歉,并真诚地向因为我而感到痛苦的人道歉。我不会为我所做的找理由,并呼吁那些和马云一样不幸遭遇的性骚扰受害者站出来诉诸法律。”…

不只是打理选区琐碎事务 郑庆顺:议员应反映民意

新加坡国立大学建筑系客座教授郑庆顺认为,国会议员的主要职责,乃是作为在国会立法的代议士,所以针对一些攸关国家和民生的课题,能够确实反映选区选民的观点尤为重要。 遗憾的是,他认为多年来人们对议员扮演的角色产生很大的误解,“国会议员从来都不只是管理每日市镇事务的管理人。这大可聘请全职经理来做。” 他直言,对于那些直接影响选民的法律、政策,例如新印全面合作协定(CECA)和禁止电动滑板车上路等,议员理应去征询选民的意见。 故此,他认为要求穆仁理为了选区内被锁的消防栓负起全责并不对。 对于选区内组屋消防栓被锁、救火时水管喷不出水,武吉巴督单选区议员穆仁理在上周五表示,作为民选代议士,“政治上需对居民负责”( politically accountable)。“这些事件不该发生,我必须道歉。我将与我的民选与受委市镇会同仁检讨此事,并保障加强消防安全系统的可靠。” 郑庆顺认为,会见选民活动本来就是让选民针对政治和政策议题反馈意见,可惜如今却矮化成微管理环节,议员则代表选民和官僚机构交流。 “尽管这有助收集反馈以改善行政规则和程序,但都不是当议员的主要职能。”而他认为,如今议员们在国会立法表现差强人意,可能正是因为职能的定位错位。 对此,人民之声党领袖林鼎赞同郑庆顺的观点,也直言国会议员不仅仅是当“社区管理人”,更不讳言即便在管理选区方面,行动党议员的表现也不如反对党。 已故建国总理李光耀,在2011年大选前曾指若投给反对党,就会变成贫民区。不过林鼎对比工人党秘书长毕丹星管理下的惹兰达迈,以及行动党管理下的兀兰,指后者反而成了李光耀口中的“贫民区”。 回溯1988年6月,国会提呈《市镇会法》,时任副总理的吴作栋解释,该法把属建屋局的权力,转移到各选区民选国会议员和基层领袖手上。 他认为此举让议员和居民们更大权力和责任,管理和参与选区的事务和发展。…