During an hour-long ministerial forum with students of the Singapore University of Social Sciences (SUSS) on 4 September, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong answered several questions from the audience.
Videos of the premier’s answers were uploaded into a playlist on the Prime Minister’s Office Youtube Channel.
When asked about his aspirations for the future of education in Singapore, PM Lee said that recent shift in PSLE scoring and introducing multiple pathways to higher education are moves which he hopes will result in quality students.
students who are rigorously education, who are good at what they are doing, and who are passionate and want to keep on learning, and at the same time are good Singaporean citizens.
“I hope we will produce students who are rigorously education, who are good at what they are doing, and who are passionate and want to keep on learning, and at the same time are good Singaporean citizens.”
Though the PM admits there is no “best education system”, Singapore’s mostly got it working well.
“I mean every education system has got its plusses and minuses, and you keep on tweaking, adjusting, improving. Then you watch what happens then you have to make further adjustments. And so hopefully we make progress. But in Singapore, I think by and large we’ve got our education system working,” he said.
He emphasised, “In Singapore when you graduate, your degree is worth something, your diploma is worth something. You can find a job.”
He pointed out that there is no youth unemployment problem in Singapore, unlike many countries which produce higher numbers of graduates but universities end up not maintaining their standards.
He explained, “Their job is not to maintain standards, it’s to pass people. And if they try to uphold standards and they say their students are not up to scratch, they may get scolded, they may lose funding, and then the department will have to close down. So better pass everybody and I keep on pretending to teach them.”
This is even a problem in some European countries, said PM Lee, but not in Singapore where he estimates that about 40% of the population are going to university.
What’s crucial is ensuring that students learn something valuable at universities, that it is worth their money, time and effort, said the PM, adding that students should learn things that they can later use for the benefit of Singapore.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Holiday gift from Scoot and Klook for victims of tour agency closure

It was reported on Wednesday how a 68-year-old cleaner, Madam Teo Ino…

Toa Payoh vandal tried to wiggle out of heavy sentence: DPP

Boaz Koh Wen Jie, 18, had deliberately enrolled into a rehabilitation centre…

王鼎昆建议送餐员改当邮差

自上周政府突然宣布禁止电动滑板车在行人道行驶禁令,依靠电动滑板车的送餐员生计大受影响,在各个国会议员的会见人民活动上,亦有不少送餐员现身向议员求助。 约30名使用电动滑板车的送餐员,集聚在兀兰5大道,和马西岭-油池集选区行动党议员王鼎昆会面。 据《Mothership》报导指出,送餐员与王鼎昆会面,主要是向他反映有关禁令所带来的问题,以及听取对方对此是否有什么解决方法。 Mothership在其脸书页面上传了一段两方的交流视频,间中,王鼎昆曾建议送餐员以脚车来取代个人代步工具。 建议以脚车替代电动滑板车 一名送餐员表示,若改用脚车,他们一个小时内最多只能完成三分订单,只赚取15元。“一个订单值五元,三个15元,吃呢,现在需要多少钱了?” (视频来源:Mothership) 每日奔波拼订单只为生计 另一名送餐员也指出,他们每天似疯了般跑来跑去,只为了谋生计。“无论大雨日晒,我们仍然需要骑车为顾客送食物。” 对此,王鼎昆也带来了新加坡职工总会和就业与职能培训中心(e2i)的代表,尝试建议这些送餐员其他的工作选项。 他甚至一度询问他们,是否愿意担任新加坡邮政的邮差。“如果你不介意,我这就业与职能培训中心和职总的同事都能够帮忙,成为邮差怎么样?” 然而,一名骑士回应并强调他偏好担任送餐员。“可以……如果我们成为(邮差),那么其他人就不用吃啦,不用点餐啦。”…

孙雪玲形容假消息如新病毒,为《防假消息法》辩护

內政部兼国家发展部高级政务次长孙雪玲于昨日国会中发表声明,并将假消息形容为“新病毒”,并以“新疗法“一词为法案辩护。 她认为,假消息如同新病毒一般,会迅速传染而且影响面积广泛,目前我国正受到网络假信息的感染,而对付“新病毒”则需为其提供有效的“新疗法”,目前提呈的法案就是打击假消息的新疗法。 她表示,日前与高级政务部长唐振辉及工人党领袖毕丹星,一同参与了英国国际假新闻与假信息委员会听证大会,与八个不同国家代表一起探讨如何应对假信息。他举例说明,目前网络假信息是全球面临的现状,许多国家如法国或德国也有专门针对假信息与数字平台制定新法律,对其进行监控。 她说“所以我们的举措并不另类,打击网络假信息也是十分常见的,新加坡和其他国家一道,正在努力对抗这种新病毒,保护国家的健康“ 她认为评估新法案的好坏应探讨两方面:第一,新法案是否比现有的法案好;第二,新法案是否对症下药及有没有副作用。 称新法创新,也更符合需求 另一方面,针对刘程强所提出的质疑,孙雪玲也逐一回应,认为部长之前已解释了现有法律如新加坡广播法是23年前实施。当时并没有网络社交媒体与平台,故无将网络媒体平台纳入该法中。而新法案的好处恰恰可将网络媒体平台也纳入其中。 再者,以往的措施是以屏蔽信息为主,而新法案则是以更正假信息来澄清事实,收到更正假信息指示的网络媒体平台只要将真信息附上,便可免于刑事制裁。 孙雪玲说 “这是第一个创新的做法,因为其他国家所采取的主要措施是要求网络公司把网络信息撤下。“ 她认为,相比之下,新加坡所提出的法案更加包容,也更加符合新环境的需要。 而新法案就如同多了一盏灯,提供了更多信息来做参考,来判断一件事情的真伪。所以新法案不仅不会影响言论自由,而是提供了民众更多的渠道,获取信息。…