Singapore central financial district skyline at blue hour from Marina bay Singapore cityscape from

Singapore retains its position as the second safest city in the world, according to the Safe Cities Index 2019 report by the Economic Intelligence Unit (EIU). Sponsored by the NEC Corporation, the report released on 29 August showed that Tokyo was the safest city overall, with Asia-Pacific cities making up 6 of the top 10. Other cities in the top ten include Osaka (3rd), Amsterdam (4th), Sydney (5th), Toronto (6th), Washington, DC (7th), Seoul and Copenhagen (tied 8th) and Melbourne (10th).
The index ranks 60 cities based on 57 indicators across four pillars: digital security, health security, infrastructure security and personal security.
Singapore is ranked second behind Tokyo in Digital Security but takes the lead in both Infrastructure and Personal Security. As for Health security, Singapore ranked 8th.

(Source: Safe Cities Index 2019, Economic Intelligence Unit)
While Asia Pacific cities make up the top 10 overall cities, the report emphasises that geographic reasons do not have a statistical link with the results.
“A closer look at the important correlates of security, discussed below, found city safety is not related to the global region: Tokyo, Singapore and Osaka lead because of their specific strengths, not because they happen to be in Asia.”
Said EIU senior editor Naka Kondo, editor of this year’s report on the Safe Cities Index, “Although APAC cities such as Tokyo, Singapore and Osaka continue to rank within the top three cities in the Index, the region also hosts some of the lowest-scoring cities in the world, with Yangon, Karachi and Dhaka close to the bottom of the list.”
She also added that while cities in Asia-Pacific did well in the pillars of health, infrastructure and personal security, North American cities fared better in the digital security category, accounting for seven out of the 10 cities in the lead.
The report noted that wealth and transparency are important determinants of safety. It said, “Every previous SCI report has remarked that cities in high-income countries do better on average than those in lower-income states,” adding that overall SCI results correlate closely with income per person in cities.
The fact that higher-income countries performed better across the board is a result of the need for substantial investment in certain areas such as high-quality infrastructure and advanced health systems.
However, the report also goes on to reveal that in cities where funds are scarcer, so too is policy ambition. It appears that less economically developed cities are challenged by a lack of effective planning and management.
The report highlighted that a city’s score in the different pillars are closely related, demonstrating just how closely different kinds of safety are ‘intertwined’.
“A look at the overall standings shows that the ranking of any given city in a particular pillar tends not to vary greatly from its ranking in other pillars,” it said.
The report noted that the results are not evenly spread but have a large number of cities clustered at the top, with the others showing more variation in scores. Only 10 points separate the top 24 cities in the overall scores, while the following 36 cities are over 40 points apart.
However, the report stressed, “This does not mean that the differences in the leaders’ group are unimportant. Instead, on a scale that can measure every index city, the large group of top cities are much more similar to each other than to those lagging behind.”
The SCI is released every two years. In 2017 and 2015, Singapore ranked 2nd.

Top 30 safest cities

(Source: Safe Cities Index 2019, Economic Intelligence Unit)
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】疫情下竞选 网民纳闷在野党是否获平等宣传机会?

日前选举局宣布,来届选举将无法举办群众大会,,选举局鼓励政党和候选人,进行不涉及群聚的宣传竞选方式,例如网络直播大会等。 除了网络直播大会,候选人也可以选区竞选广播方式进行,广播将在5频道(Channel 5)播出,每名候选人将会有3分钟的时间发表政见,例如,单选区候选人有3分钟发言时间,四人集选区候选人共有12分钟、五人集选区为15分钟。候选人可任意选择任何一种官方语言发言。 选举局也强调,发布竞选准则与大选何时举行无关,而大选日期又总理所决定。一旦卫生部宣布解封第三阶段的指引,选举局将再做出调整。 至于网络竞选广告,则需符合当局早前公布的条规,例如竞选期开始12小时内,候选人须上网向选举官,申报用来发布竞选广告的平台。如有用新平台,无论付费或非付费,也要申报。广告将需列出刊登广告者,如候选人本身、政党还是经授权的第三方竞选者。 对此,许多网民纷纷在《海峡时报》底下留言,质疑这是否对反对党而言是一个公平竞争的机会。有者认为,由于执政党人民行动党一直有广播媒体,电视频道作为后盾,而给了他们巨大的优势。 再者,若解封尚未迈入第三阶段,民间也担忧疫情复发,对社会和经济的冲击是很大的。 网友 Muhammad Fazli:确定这能够有个公平竞争的机会? 网友 Muhammad…

SAFRA poster criticised for being sexist and distasteful

A promotional poster by SAFRA – or SAFRA National Service Association –…

The panda that trampled on the true orchids

Should S’poreans boycott Botanic Gardens exhibitions because of “Dendrobium Thein Sein”?