Last month, Australian news media reported that a Melbourne gardener has become the first person to sue Bayer’s Monsanto in Australia over its weed killer product, Roundup (‘Melbourne gardener launches legal action against Monsanto in first Australian Roundup lawsuit‘, 4 Jun)
Bayer has already lost 3 lawsuits in the US with the jury finding its weed killer responsible for the cancer of the plaintiffs. Some 13,000 lawsuits are currently pending in US’ courts over Bayer’s weed killer product.
The Melbourne gardener, Michael Ogliarolo, 54, filed a writ in Victoria’s Supreme Court last month. He ran his own landscape gardening business until he was forced to retire due to ill health. He was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and had been using Roundup for over 18 years in his work as a landscape gardener.
His lawyer said his client would mix the herbicide and apply it on lawns and plants as part of his job. Mr Ogliarolo is claiming Monsanto failed to warn him that the use of Roundup products was dangerous and capable of causing serious injuries, loss and damage.
“What we’re saying is that due to the heavy exposure, no warnings on the label to say ‘look, wear a mask, wash your hands, do this and do that’, consequently he was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma,” his lawyer told the media.
The lawyer said they would be using similar evidence presented in the three trials in the US and would bring international experts over if needed. There was plenty of evidence showing that glyphosate could cause cancer, the lawyer added.
He also said that the number of people using Roundup in Australia was “absolutely massive”. “Usually pain and suffering’s over A$500,000 and loss of income’s around A$1.2 million, but we’d be asking in these sorts of cases for punitive damages,” he said.
In the US, Monsanto has so far been ordered to pay four cancer patients, with the most recent verdict ordering a payout of US$2 billion. Bayer is expected to appeal in all the cases it has lost.
Sydney council workers walk-off and refuse to work over Roundup
Meanwhile, earlier this month, it was reported that some 500 workers working for the Blacktown City Council in Western Sydney walked-off and refused to work with the glyphosate-based Roundup.
The United Services Union which represents council workers said outdoor staff at Blacktown City Council refused to continue using Roundup over safety concerns. The union revealed that the “dispute escalated” after the council management ordered six staff either to use the product or be forced into alternative jobs, resulting in a number of staff stopping work.
The council then urgently sought a hearing at the Industrial Relations Commission after garbage bins were not collected and some outdoor services were disrupted due to the industrial action by the workers.
However, it later relented and announced that an agreement had been reached with the union, under which the workers would return to their jobs as long as the council implemented a trial of a “viable alternate weed control product”.
“We have agreed to trial viable alternatives. What is important for everyone to understand is that council will not place employees or members of the public at risk,” Blacktown’s mayor assured.
Currently, glyphosate has not been banned in Australia.
Bayer remains defiant while Temasek remains confident
With regard to the latest Roundup lawsuit being initiated in Australia, Bayer continues to support its product and affirm that its weed killer doesn’t cause cancer. In a statement, it said:

“We have great sympathy for any individual with cancer but the extensive body of science on glyphosate-based herbicides over four decades supports the conclusion that Roundup does not cause non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. At the end of the day, whether you’re in the court of law, regulatory agencies or court of public opinion, it’s the science that should matter here.”

Temasek Holdings, which invested at least 3 billion euros in Bayer last year and helped it to takeover the US company Monsanto which produces Roundup, reportedly said that it is confident about Bayer’s “future prospects”.
At a recent media event, Temasek’s Head of Americas John Vaske said that their investment in Bayer was “underwritten by a long-term thesis that still remains intact today”. He added that Bayer has largely met the Temasek team’s initial assumptions and projections, which gives them confidence.
Vaske noted that the decline in Bayer’s share prices is a “function of the uncertainty surrounding the litigation case”. As an investor focused on the long term without immediate capital needs, Temasek is able to look past the uncertainty surrounding the litigation issue and focus on the company’s long-term potential, he said.
Since Roundup lawsuits started surfacing last year, Temasek has lost close to 40 per cent from its original investment of 3 billion euros.
Following the lawsuit filed by the Melbourne gardener, it was also reported that at least two Australian law firms, LHD Laywers and Maurice Blackburn, are investigating potential class actions against Bayer. The law firms revealed that they have been receiving “hundreds of inquiries” from people exposed to glyphosate since last year.
“It’s people from all walks of life, mums and dads using the product every weekend doing the garden, to more heavy users like those involved in vegetation management in particular and also people from the farming community where they use a lot of this product day in and day out,” a lawyer at Maurice Blackburn told the media.
“So we’re actively investigating a number of cases and we’re in the stage of getting expert evidence to help support individual actions.”
In any case, more lawsuits appear to be soon queuing up in Australian courts too but both Bayer and Temasek remain confident.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

内容涉复述李玮玲指控总理要求本社撤文 媒体人质问弟妹畅所欲言其他人却不行?

昨日(9月1日),李总理新闻秘书张俪霖,代表总理向本社总编许渊臣发函,指本社英语站在8月15日刊登的一篇评论,复述针对总理的不实指控,要求本社撤下并在三日内道歉。 张俪霖指上述评论涉及重复总理妹妹李玮玲,在此前作出的指控,指其已故父亲李光耀曾受到哥哥李显龙的误导,误以为欧思礼38号故居已经获政府宪报为文化遗产,故此要保留遗嘱中要求拆除故居的指示是徒劳的。 张俪霖驳斥上述指控毫无根据,也解释2017年7月,总理已在国会作出充分解释,反驳其弟妹的指控。总理重申李光耀个人遗嘱要求在他百年后拆除欧思礼38号故居。 然而,在听取内阁一致认为故居不应被拆除的意见后,李光耀最终接受政府有可能出于公共利益而保留该产业,因此愿意灵活处理和考虑拆屋以外的选项。 此外,张俪霖也反驳,李光耀自2011年起就没有在任何一份遗嘱中,将李总理列为遗嘱执行人和受托人。 她续称,上述文章的指控具诽谤行,总理选择不起诉弟妹,不代表容许他人复述和散播这些指控。 信函称总理限定本社英语站在三天内需撤下上述评论,并刊登道歉启事以及承诺不再刊载有关指控,否则总理“别无选择,只能委律师行使法律权益”。 本社英语站已在昨晚撤下上述誌期8月15日的评论文章,惟暂未针对总理公署的要求,作出任何回应。 对于总理公署再对本社抛下重磅弹,也有许多读者、社运分子表达关注,其中范国瀚就在个人脸书揶揄,“总理又在起诉网络批评声音”。 至于资深媒体人兼《海峡时报》前副总编辑默乐(Bertha Henson)则质问,总理选择不起诉弟妹,但是不容许他人复述、散播他们的指控,难道意味着总理的弟妹可以畅所欲言,但是其他人如果重复他们的言论就不可以?“法律是这样运作的么?” 人权律师、前政治拘留者张素兰则好奇询问:如果网络公民请总理弟妹也参与诉讼?恐怕只有总理和他的弟妹才知道真相。…

Petain Road name change would open floodgates

~ By Narayana Narayana ~ Prof Tommy Koh' posted a commentary "Should…

警方回应莫汉被移交马国事件 惟仍有疑惑待厘清

公民莫汉五年前被移交马来西亚执法机构,经历逾四个月“无妄之灾”。本社在上月17日即已致函相关单位和部门,以核实详情,时隔一月后,警方终于对此事发表声明;警方称逮捕过程符合法律架构,不过,当局的澄清,仍有待进一步厘清。 现年50岁的莫汉(Mohan Rajangam),在2015年被20名警察在其工作地点逮捕,在没有向其家人透露任何下落,以及没有新加坡警察部队或驻马的新加坡高级专员署采取后续行动下,被送到马来西亚滞留了四个月。 在马国获释后,他还必须两度自掏腰包购买返回新加坡的飞机票。当他首次登上飞机回国时,被发现逾期居留,以致被当地移民局扣留、缴交罚款后,不得不再买过一张返国机票。 事实上,如果执法单位能够在事前,再三确认他并没有涉及谋杀案件,或者验证他的护照,证明他在谋杀案发生期间并没有离开新加坡,那么他或许根本不需要经历这个无妄之灾。 然而,新加坡警方作出的澄清,仍有一些问题待厘清。 新加坡警方于1月17日所做出的澄清内容,包括了: 在2015年1月,当局认定莫汉和马国的帮派成员维持着定期联系。 马国皇家警察指莫汉涉嫌参与马国帮派毒品行动,及窝藏参与柔佛州枪战的团伙成员后,向新加坡警方寻求协助,当局在2015年3月21日逮捕莫汉。 当局是以涉嫌毒品行动及帮派有关罪行,将莫汉逮捕。 当局依据《滥用毒品法》,对莫汉的房子展开搜查行动。 马国皇家警察部队针对于2015年3月2日在马国槟城发生的谋杀案,取得马国法庭发出的逮捕令。…

政府26日起 进行第三轮派发口罩活动

下周二(26日)起至6月1日,早上10时至6时,民众可前往国内指定民众联络所和居民委员会,领取可重复使用口罩。这是当局的第三次派发口罩活动。民众受促携带有效身份证。 26日起至6月14日,民众则可在各个民众联络所放置的口罩派发机,领取口罩。民众只需扫描身份证就能领取。 贸工部长陈振声在脸书分享,改良版口罩分成人和孩童版两种。是由俐马集团(Ramatex)、新加坡科技研究局(A*Star)、锦利集团(Ghim Li)和南洋理工大学研发。 当局称,新改良口罩有三层布料,更舒适透气,阻断细菌的效果能达到95巴仙。 民众可浏览 www.maskgowhere.gov.sg查询领取免费口罩地点。