On Monday (8 July), Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Home Affair Mr Amrin Amin said in Parliament that the government is studying the observations made by the Court of Appeal about the concept of ‘wilful blindness’ and will present its view on whether it is necessary to make legislative amendments.
Mr Amrin added that the Government’s understanding of the law is “not in any way different” from the Court of Appeal’s in relation to the “key issue” of a case in question.
The case in question is that of 36-year old Nigerian, Adili Chibuike Ejika who was condemned to death two years ago for importing methamphetamine into Singapore but was later cleared of his charges by the Court of Appeal on 27 May.
When Mr Adili arrived in Singapore from Lagos in November 2011, his luggage was found to have contained two packets of crystalline substance in the lining. The substance was determined to be methamphetamine. Consequently, he was charged with drug trafficking.
During his trial, Mr Adili did not dispute that he possessed the luggage and drugs contained therein. However, he defence was that he did not know that the drugs were in the luggage in the first place. After a 2-year trial, the Nigerian was found guilty by Senior Judge Kan Ting Chiu.
However, on appeal, the Court set out guidelines and principles as to the doctrine of wilful blindness, i.e. where an accused person did not in fact know the true position, but sufficiently suspected what it was, and deliberately refused to investigate in order to avoid confirmation of his own suspicions.
On that note, the Court of Appeal applied the test to the facts of the case and found that Mr Adili was not wilfully blind as to the existence of the drugs, noting that even if he did open the luggage to look inside, he would have not known the drugs were in there since it was hidden in the lining. With that, Mr Adili walked free.

The government’s response

Now, in response to Mr Amrin’s statement in parliament about the government reviewing the Court of Appeal’s observations and possibly considering legislative amendments, MP Christopher De Souza asked whether there was even a need to review the provisions of the Misuse of Drugs Act in light of this judgement. He also asked how the presumptions in the Act will continue to function as a legal took in preventing drug trafficking in and through Singapore.
Replying, Mr Amrin noted that the key issue in Mr Adili’s case was whether or not the accused could rebut the presumptions that he knew the nature of the drugs in his suitcase. The Court of Appeal had highlighted that the prosecution had conceded that the accused didn’t know the drugs were in his luggage.
He said, “The presumption allows the court to conclude that the accused did know. But if the prosecution accepts that the accused did not know of that fact, then obviously the presumption cannot be relied upon.”
“This legal reasoning is neither novel nor new, and is not in any way different from the Government’s understanding of the law,” he added.

Lawyers question the need for a review

However, speaking to TODAY on the issue, a couple of lawyers pointed out that there is no real need to review the legislation.
Criminal law practitioner Mr Ramesh Tiwary said that Mr Adili’s case was peculiar, and something he hasn’t seen in his three decade of experience. Mr Tiwary, who is experienced in handling drug cases, emphasised that the Misuse of Drugs Act if ‘rife with presumptions’.
“Presumptions are not evidence…so I don’t think we need to load more presumptions into the (Act) when we are faced with capital punishment.
“You don’t want to hang somebody when you are not sure that a person actually should have known that there are drugs.”
Another lawyer, Mr Eugene Thuraisingam, echoed Mr Thiwary that the recent case shouldn’t prompt a review of the Act.
“It stands for a very simple proposition. If on the one hand, the prosecution makes an important concession in that they accepted that the person did not know there were drugs in the bag…they cannot then go on to rely on the presumption (that he did).”
This, Mr Thuraisingam said, was “logically inconsistent”. The issue with the prosecution conceding that Mr Adili didn’t know about the drugs.
Activist, politician, and lawyer Teo Soh Lung agreed on with the assessment of her peers. On her Facebook page, she questioned the rationale behind the government’s decision to possibly amend the legislation. She wrote, “Just because one person escapes the gallows our parliament wants to tinker with the law? What kind of leaders do we have? They like to hang people?”

International human rights lawyer from Carson Law Chambers Mr Ravi added, “We need to immediately recognise that the presumption of innocence is taken away from the accused by way of presumptions under the MDA. The accused persons are already prejudiced.”
“Wilful Blindness and Presumption of Knowledge under Section 18(2) of the MDA presents several odds that are irretrievably stacked against the accused. Many face the death penalty,” he continued.
The lawyer added that any amendments proposed to Section 18(2) by Parliament should reflect the positive outcome in the clarifications made by the Chief Justice on the application of the presumptions.
He elaborated, “The court of appeal has set an enlightened path for the legislature to walk through in considering any amendments if it wishes to make.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

新马抗疫工作小组第二次会议 同意关卡若发现疑似症状旅客将遣返

我国交通部兼卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明医生,在脸书发文指出昨日(24日)与邻国马来西亚,召开第二次新马抗疫联合工作小组会议。 他表示,经过商讨两国同意继续落实新马间的边境健康检测,并把不符合入境的体温统一为摄氏37.5度。与此同时,也落实互惠安排,若陆路或海路关卡检测发现疑似症状旅客,则立即遣返。 蓝彬明是在昨日,与马国副卫生部长诺阿兹米医生(Dr. Haji Noor Azmi Ghazali)以及其官员,展开视讯会议。 他指出新马之间紧密合作,并确保来往新马两地之间的同行者健康状况都获得检测。双方也讨论货物与服务之间往来的安排。 新马工作小组也谈论如何减缓疫情感染曲线,他指出在新加坡进行政府和社会层级的管理措施,经协调的全国性对应,来自社会群众的支持也很重要。 早前,新马之间已商讨,新马之间的物资物流,包括食物供应仍会持续。

72-year-old elderly cabby blacks out and knocks down pedestrians

The media reported today (24 Mar) that a taxi driver who lost…

Nonsensical sign for playground emerges online again?

Imagine walking into a restaurant to have a meal and you stumble…

Neo Swee Lin releases 'Open Letter against Gutter Politics' featuring prominent personalities

Veteran Actress Neo Swee Lin, a guest speaker for the third SDP…