by Simon Lim
I was recently hospitalised in a public hospital for a few days and while I was hospitalised, I have observed for myself at first hand how those nurses went about their work 24/7, their nationalities and also thought deeper about issues relating to medical costs, medical insurance, medical subsidies and more.
Regarding medical cost and medical insurance, one thought quickly came to my mind. I am sure that many people still remember when Khaw Boon Wan boasted about his $8/ heart by-pass surgery. I believe that many people didn’t like it when Khaw Boon Wan bragged about his $8/ out of pocket heart by-pass surgery, however, I am one of those people who believed what he said and for all those others who also believed what he said must all come to one conclusion, ie, he either had very substantial Medisave balance or very, very comprehensive medical insurance or both that took care of his very hefty heart by-pass medical bills. If Khaw had bought and paid for his medical insurance premiums out of his own pockets over the years, I congratulate him and I will also wish him well and speedy recovery.
However, I have a question.

I do not know if People’s Action Party (PAP) cabinet ministers enjoy comprehensive medical insurance coverage as part of their perks and privileges. I have raised this question with REACH about two weeks ago and the officer at REACH has also assured me that they have forwarded my feedback to the relevant authorities but to-date, I have yet to receive any reply. Zero.
If PAP cabinet ministers do in fact enjoy comprehensive medical insurance coverage as part of their perks and privileges, then, that must stop! I take strong issue with that. Why? Let me explain. These days, even school teachers who drive to school are made to pay for parking all in the name of Clean Wages. Our ministers are paid a very respectable political salary that even ministers from the OECD countries could only admire and salivate. All monies that they take and/or spend come from the people, our citizens.
Singaporeans need to have enough common sense in them, spine and discipline never to tolerate any ministers from any political parties to ever privatise the benefits for themselves but socialise the cost under whatever clever pretext, especially under our public sector’s Clean Wage Policy.
I repeat. Never, never allow or tolerate any political office holders to ever privatise the benefits for themselves but socialise the costs among our citizens under whatever clever or cunning pretexts. Period. Think!
This was first published on Simon Lim’s Facebook page and reproduced with permission.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Only 4 out of 28 Su-30s and MiG-29s in RMAF can fly vs 100 F-15s and F-16s in RSAF

It was reported in the Malaysian media last Tue (31 Jul) that…

Minister pulled off two head scratchers and one deflection

Opinion piece by Augustine Low on Minister Edwin Tong’s response to the proposal of an English test for citizenship in Singapore and his comments on high rental at Geylang Serai Ramadan bazaar. His statement that a significant proportion of Singaporeans throughout history have not been able to speak English well and his example of his 96-year-old grandmother not being able to pass the test are considered irrelevant and deflections from the issue. Additionally, his response to the issue of high rental rates for trade fairs and bazaars has been criticized as a deflection rather than addressing the problem.

Low levels of welfare makes UBI expensive to implement in Singapore

by Chris Kuan At the Future of Singapore (FOSG) forum on the…

Critics focusing on the word “folksy” may be missing the forest for the trees

Workers’ Party (WP) politician, Jamus Lim (Lim), has clarified the use of…