Last Wed (26 Jun), a 60-year-old elderly man Lim Koh Leong wrote on his Facebook page that despite having more than enough money in his CPF account to cover his daughter’s education fees, he was not allowed by the CPF Board to use a portion of the funds for his daughter’s education.

His Facebook post immediately went viral in couple of days, now garnering at least more than 1,400 comments.

Mr Lim revealed that he currently has more than $70,000 in his CPF account and he only needs $15,000 for his daughter’s school fees.

“Currently I’m already 60 years old, with an unstable job, how am I supposed to get the needed cash for my daughter’s education?!” he asked.

At the CPF office, he told the staff, “The money in my CPF is my hard earned money, I only need to use a part of it to pay for my daughter’s school fees which is $15,000, my CPF has more than enough inside to pay for my daughter’s school fees. Is there another way to do this?”

Apparently, according to Mr Lim, the staff from CPF Board told him abruptly, “Can apply, the chance of it is zero.”

Mr Lim continued, “I felt cheated, humiliated, angry. So many years of hard work, sweat and tears to earn the money and it’s inside CPF. It is supposed to be my money. I’m in need of it and yet, I cannot take my own money to help pay my daughter’s school fees.”

“Please share this post to help,” he added. “As a father, I want to help my daughter… Do I really have to resort to borrowing money and loans when I got my money in my CPF? Should I be forced to stop my daughter’s education?”

“Believe that this does not happen to just me. This kind of government… treating our own Singaporeans like this, can I still have trust and faith in them? Even for just my child’s school fees. What should I do? What can I do?” he asked.

CPF Board replies

Yesterday (29 Jun), CPF Board replied on its Facebook page. It said that Mr Lim did not have sufficient money in his CPF account for “basic retirement”. Hence, allowing him to use his CPF money for his daughter’s education is “not appropriate”.

CPF advised Mr Lim that a “better approach” is to “find other ways” to finance his daughter’s school fees. “We have spoken to him and are discussing alternative options,” it added.

CPF Board also said that after reviewing its video recording, it is “satisfied that our staff had served Mr Lim calmly and professionally”.

It added that Mr Lim had, in fact, apologised presumably for his post on 26 Jun. “Mr Lim explained he was upset and offered his apology which our staff has accepted,” CPF Board said.

Mr Lim thanks everyone for their support

Mr Lim also wrote another post on his Facebook page yesterday to update everyone that his daughter’s school fees have been settled by his own family members.

“Dear friends, my daughter’s tuition for education has been properly solved by my loved ones. Thank you very much for your concern and support,” Mr Lim wrote.

“In just a few days, I’ve undergone a lot of pressure and I am worried about my daughter’s future. I believe that there should be a lot of people who have the same problems as me. I hope they have better luck than me.”

He was especially touched by the thousands of Singaporeans who have shown their support.

“What touched me the most was that in such a small country under the pressure of being busy and living our own lives, I did not expect thousands of warmhearted people. They were discussing things about how my to solve daughter’s tuition, giving me advice and comforting me. Helping me check the information and so on,” he said.

“All the things you have done for me, I’m grateful, moved, I really don’t know how to thank you, I wish to make friends with all of you… There are also many people who even call me and send me a text message, willing to fork out their own money. Thank you very much. Your kindness is in my heart.”

“Once again, let me say: Thank you for your help and support, thank you! Thank you!” Mr Lim thanked everyone profusely.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

New politician on the block gets swarmed by IBs on CPF post

Brad Bowyer, a member of the People’s Voice Party took his Facebook…

Balakrishnan issues statement on Vincent Wijeysingha video

Andrew Loh People’s Action Party (PAP) candidate for Holland-Bukit Timah Group Representation…

PAP’s Lee Hsien Loong on Ivan Lim controversy: We can’t simply write off and destroy people like this; Netizens reminded how alternative parties were attacked before

The People’s Action Party (PAP) will investigate the veracity of the allegations…

尚穆根“以香港为例” 合理化对新加坡集会活动管制

内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根在国会拨款委员会辩论内政部开支预算时,以香港为例,解释为何新加坡对于示威活动要有严格要求。他认为如今传媒在谈论示威活动时,往往只会关注警方的过度暴力,尤其是国际媒体。 针对包括香港在内的世界多地过去一年都暴发示威,政府国会内政及律政委员会主席荷兰—武吉知马集选区迪舒沙,以及宏茂桥集选区颜添宝等议员提问,我国内政团队从中吸取哪些经验,是否有能力避免类似骚乱? 尚穆根回应说,维护治安不只是执法人员的责任,社会若是没治理好,内政团队也不能发挥作用。“你可以拥有世界上最好的警队,但除非你把其他方面也顾好,否则你仍然无法应对骚乱”,他表示。 “全世界都会发生骚乱,如智力、欧洲、香港等地方,街头抗议已然升级为暴力,扰乱了普通公民的生活,并破坏公共与私人设施。黎巴嫩也曾因数个月的骚乱而造成严重的损失。正如我提到的圣地亚哥,示威者因公共交通票价上涨被激怒,因而开始抢劫商店、放火烧车和物业。” 随后,他以香港日前示威为例表示,示威者当中他们犯下极端暴力与破坏性的行为,其目的就是为了使政府瘫痪,严重损害经济与城市的声誉。同时,也挑衅了警方。 对此,尚穆根也给予香港警方称赞,能够与新加坡并列优秀警察部队。 尚穆根:香港暴力示威因媒体的报道出现偏颇 针对香港的暴力示威,尚穆根称,“我想说,这已然严重损害警方与公众的关系。” 然而,尚穆根批评,其缘由均因媒体的报道出现偏颇,才会让人误以为警方是暴力一方,而忽略整个暴力行为的过程。他更指向当时颇受关注的示威者被真枪击倒一案,媒体忽略整件事的脉络,从而引领观众对警方出现偏见。 “媒体,尤其是国际媒体对局势的片面之词,并无助于平息示威。示威者总被冠以守护民主的称号,而警方却成为他们的对立面,同时反复提及警方过度暴力与残暴的行为。当警方那个第一次向示威者开枪时,媒体却将警方刻画称“暴力”的印象,并在世界各地大肆报道。” “然而,这件事本身的缘由却被忽略了,正如我所说,示威者经常被描绘成为正义的一方,而警方则却在暗地里被攻击,从而使警方的生命与家人处于危险和被曝光当中,但显然,这些事情却被掩盖了。” 对于香港警方,他们为了能够更好保护自己的家人与亲人,不得已而抵抗示威者。…