As the political storm unfolds between the government of Hong Kong and the city’s denizens – particularly members of civil society – over the former’s divisive extradition Bill, the mega-wealthy are moving their assets elsewhere, including to Singapore.

Financial Times reported Thu (20 Jun) that according to an executive vice-president from the Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX), Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) was under the control of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, which has been denied by the SFC.

The SGX official had also reportedly suggested that Hong Kong is no longer a safe place for high net worth individuals, as seen in the abduction of Chinese-Canadian billionaire Xiao Jianhua from the city’s Four Seasons hotel two years ago by Chinese agents.

A financial advisor involved in a transaction that entailed the shifting of assets to Singapore told Reuters that one tycoon has begun shifting more than US$100mil (S$136mil) from a Citibank account in Hong Kong to a Citibank account in Singapore.

“It’s started. We’re hearing others are doing it, too, but no-one is going to go on parade that they are leaving,” according to the advisor.

“The fear is that the bar is coming right down on Beijing’s ability to get your assets in Hong Kong. Singapore is the favoured destination,” added the advisor.

The head of the private banking operations of an international bank in Hong Kong who wished to remain anonymous told Reuters that it is not clients from mainland China “who might be politically exposed” who are moving their assets to Singapore and other places, but “wealthy Hong Kong clients”.

“The situation in Hong Kong is out of control. They can’t believe that Carrie Lam or Beijing leaders are so stupid that they don’t realise the economic damage from this,” the source added.

President of the American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong Tara Joseph told CNBC on Mon (17 Jun) that even businesses are compelled to move to Singapore and other business hubs as a way of escaping China’s purportedly growing encroachment into Hong Kong’s governance.

An anonymous source told CNBC that the extradition Bill, coupled with the political unrest that ensues the Bill, were taken into account when their company decided to move its research team to Singapore, due to the nature of the team’s work, which involves “powerful companies and figures on the mainland”.

Managing director of Hong Kong-based real estate investment firm Portwood Capital Peter Churchouse observed that “increasing numbers” of companies are also relocating their regional headquarters from Hong Kong to other parts of Asia, “most particularly” to Singapore, according to CNBC.

“That, of course, will affect demand in the Hong Kong economy,” Churchouse added, particularly in the commercial and high-end residential segments in real estate.

Director of the Centre for Governance, Institutions and Organisations at NUS Business School Lawrence Loh told FT that while the extradition bill had unnerved businesses, the “broader uncertainty is not because of the protests, but rather because the end of Hong Kong’s autonomy is clearly getting closer and closer”.

However, AFP quoted Prof Loh as saying that it is unlikely “that the uncertainty and loss of confidence has reached a tipping point where you will see the floodgates open”.

Hong Kong and Singapore have long been considered two of four Asian Tigers due to being at the forefront of rapid economic growth and industrialisation historically since the 1960s.

A report by Credit Suisse last year, however, noted that Hong Kong has a “larger base” in terms of private wealth, with more than twice the number of high net worth individuals worth more than US$100mil compared to their counterparts in the Republic.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dr Lee Weiling: Media reports continue to repeat PM Lee’s “false and dishonourable allegations” of Lee Hsien Yang

Dr Lee Weiling, daughter of late Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), has posted…

PSP sends out call for volunteer Polling Agents and Campaign Workers for GE2020

Following Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s announcement that parliament has been dissolved…

Gen Y Speaks ‘woke’ article saga: There is a line that connects such dehumanising language to hate speech, says Sudhir Vadaketh

The recent controversial op-ed written by National University of Singapore (NUS) student…

本地专才失业四月觅职未果! 邱宝忠冀政府检视招聘政策

虽然我国在官方和MyCareersFuture.sg等招聘网站上,有成千上万份就职空缺,但是真实情况却不一定令人乐观,新加坡前进党成员邱宝忠,以一名顶尖大学毕业生James的真实经历为例,促请我国政府重检聘请外国专才政策。 邱宝忠今日(9月14日)在脸书帖文指出,我国拥有很多才华横溢的PMET人才,但如今他们也面对艰难处境,而James就是其中一个例子。 James曾在新加坡国立大学担任高级管理职务,并获得大学荣誉学位,属世界顶尖大学内表现优异的应届毕业生,也肯定有履行国民服役。 “据我估计,他的薪金应在8000元到1万元之间,但可悲的是,他甚至无法获得4至5千元的工作。” James是其中一名受到疫情影响而失业的人士之一。他在《今日报》分享了他的经历,并且持续面对挑战前进的动力。他于42岁重返校园。James在处理国际市场的公共教育领域工作了18年,曾为四名雇主打拼,以及在国内外从事营销行业。 他于2016年,因家庭关系返回狮城,并于今年初,加入了规模较小的国际公司分行,负责领导这里的团队发展亚洲业务。 然而不巧因疫情影响,雇主于今年5月底解雇了整个新加入的分行团队,包括他在内。 经过四个月觅职,他申请超过80个职位,甚至连以前工作岗位的最初级职务都申请了。然而招聘人员对他说,“世界已经改变了,James,你可以减薪一半吗?”。担任高位的招聘员指出,他比客户所期待的来的“有经验多了”。 他之后听取朋友和伙伴的建议,通过Linkedln和有可能聘请的雇主直接接触,或开拓自己的交流网,也有很多人表示乐意为他做介绍,但是四个月来都没有接获过任何面试交流。 这种种甚至让他觉得离开狮城10年是个错误,因为有不少雇主就因为这样而拉低他的评估。然而他最后决定继续留在本地觅职。 他卖掉自己的屋子,以便能够抚养年届八旬的老父母,并到商业学院报名,攻读工商管理硕士学位。 外国人才职务无人能替代?…