Media
Who runs the Facebook pages of cabinet ministers? Who pays them?
In early 2019, Facebook released a new tool called ‘Page Transparency’ which allows people access to more information about a page and who is managing it. The tool is intended to help users determine whether a page can be trusted or not. The Page Transparency tab shows users information about when the page was created, a history of page name changes, and how many managers the page has as well as the location of those managers.
Now, a quick look at the Facebook pages of Singapore’s cabinet ministers shows that their pages are all managed by people in Singapore – with the exception of the Minister of Health Gan Kim Yong’s page which has no page managers listed at all.
Pages by cabinet ministers appear to be run by as little as 2 managers per page (Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Finance, Heng Swee Keat) to as many as 19 managers (Minister of Defence, Ng Eng Hen).
The Facebook page of the Prime Minister, Mr Lee Hsien Loong, is managed by 11 people based in Singapore.
Being public figures busy with important jobs, these ministers have thousands – and in the case of PM Lee, millions – of followers on social media. So it makes sense that they would have a team of people running their social media accounts, keeping an eye on their corner of cyberspace.
In an interview by MediaCorp reported on by Asia One in April 2019, PM Lee revealed that he has a ‘small team’ supporting his online activity, adding that he does try to vet everything before it’s posted. The team apparently plans the premier’s posts about one to two weeks in advance while Mr Lee himself will, from time to time, share his own random photos and musings.
The PM didn’t reveal how many people were on this social media support team.
This raises the question: How much national resources are being channelled by cabinet ministers or even Ministers of State into social media support teams for their personal outreach?
Surely the official Facebook pages of these ministers are not run by volunteers nor should they be, given that the pages are by default considered sources of official information. In fact, when a post is made on cabinet minister’s verified Facebook page – the one with the blue tick – we all assumed it comes directly from said minister unless otherwise stated. It’s what counts as official nowadays.
But given that these ministers are very busy with the serious business of running a country, they must have a team of people helping them with social media, like the PM does. And given that they are government employees, their staff would be paid on the government’s dime as well.
Having said that, the expenses of managing these social media pages of current cabinet ministers is questionable, particularly because these same pages which are boosted by the efforts of public servants or contractors paid by public monies, will be used by those politicians as a tool in their election campaign, paid for by taxpayers.
To put it to perspective, even if the politician is to step down from his or her position, or even voted out of office, the Facebook page remains the property of the politician. So is it right to enhance the value of one’s asset using public resources?
Given that DPM Teo Chee Heng has proclaimed that Singapore government practice a clean wage system when asked about the actual pay of Ministers, should there be transparency in the financing of the social media pages and various platforms of the politicians? Not to forget, our politicians are already the highest paid in the world.
TOC has reached out to the cabinet ministers for their comments.
The Ministry of National Development (MND) confirmed that the Minister for National Development Lawrence Wong “manages his own Facebook page with support by Ministry staff for MND-related content”. Mr Wong is also the Second Minister for Finance.
Update 14/6:
Similar to MND, The Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources (MEWR) has also confirmed that “Minister Masagos Zulkifli manages his own Facebook page, with support from MEWR staff for Ministry-related content.”
Hong Kong
Former STAND News journalists jailed for sedition in landmark Hong Kong case
On 26 September 2024, former Stand News chief editors Chung Pui-kuen and Patrick Lam were sentenced in a landmark sedition case. Chung received a 21-month prison term, while Lam’s sentence was reduced due to health issues. The ruling is seen as part of Hong Kong’s crackdown on press freedom.
On 26 September 2024, a Hong Kong district court sentenced Chung Pui-kuen, former chief editor of the pro-democracy news outlet Stand News, to 21 months in prison for sedition.
The case, which marks the first time a journalist has been jailed for sedition since Hong Kong’s return to Chinese sovereignty in 1997, is seen as part of an ongoing crackdown on media freedom in the city. Chung, aged 55, had led Stand News during the height of the 2019 pro-democracy protests.
Chung’s co-defendant, Patrick Lam, who also served as a chief editor, received a sentence reduction due to serious health issues, with the judge ruling that a return to prison could endanger his life.
Lam had already spent nearly a year in detention and will not face further jail time.
The two editors were found guilty in August 2024 of “conspiracy to publish and reproduce seditious publications,” under a colonial-era law that carries a maximum two-year prison sentence.
District Court Judge Kwok Wai-kin, who presided over the case, argued that Stand News had engaged in actions that opposed the government rather than genuine journalistic work.
“They were taking part in the so-called resistance,” Kwok stated, pointing to the publication’s support for the pro-democracy movement.
He emphasized the influence of Stand News, which had 1.6 million followers at the time of its shutdown in 2021, claiming that the seditious articles had caused significant, though unquantifiable, damage.
Kwok maintained that prison was the only viable sentence.
International outcry
The sentencing has drawn swift condemnation from international rights organizations and foreign governments.
The United States denounced the convictions as an attack on media freedom, and the European Union called on Hong Kong authorities to stop prosecuting journalists.
Amnesty International’s China director, Sarah Brooks, noted that the ruling seems aimed at fostering a “chilling effect” on the press, discouraging criticism of the authorities both in Hong Kong and abroad. Brooks added that the situation reflects the growing repression of free speech in the former British colony.
Joseph Ngan, Chair of Hong Kong Media Overseas, expressed concern over the broader implications of the case. “This case, with its landmark ruling outlawing criticism of the government, makes clear that Hong Kong has come fully into line with laws prevailing in Mainland China,” Ngan said. He recalled that Hong Kong had been promised freedom of speech after the end of British colonial rule, a promise that, he noted, “is now a distant memory.”
The press freedom watchdog Reporters Without Borders (RSF) echoed these concerns. Cédric Alviani, RSF’s Asia-Pacific Bureau Director, condemned the imprisonment of Chung and called for his immediate release.
He emphasized that both Chung and Lam were acting in the public interest by reporting on social and political issues in Hong Kong, and he urged the international community to increase pressure on China to secure their freedom, alongside other detained journalists in the city.
The rise and fall of STAND News
Stand News, a non-profit Chinese-language news site, was among Hong Kong’s most influential independent media outlets. At its peak, it had over 1.7 million followers on Facebook and nearly one million on Instagram.
The publication gained significant attention during the 2019 protests, offering extensive coverage of the pro-democracy movement.
In December 2021, the outlet was raided by 200 police officers, leading to the arrest of six journalists, including Chung and Lam.
That same day, Stand News announced its closure and terminated its staff after the government froze its assets, valued at approximately 61 million Hong Kong dollars (US$7 million). Around 70 employees lost their jobs as a result.
The prosecution in the case against Chung and Lam presented at least 17 articles published by Stand News between July 2020 and December 2021 as evidence.
These articles included interviews, profiles, and opinion pieces that the authorities deemed seditious. The trial, which ended in June 2023, saw the two journalists detained for nearly a year before being granted bail under strict conditions, including weekly reports to the police and a prohibition on giving media interviews.
Declining press freedom
In recent years, Hong Kong has seen its ranking in global press freedom indices fall dramatically.
According to Reporters Without Borders, the city dropped to 135th out of 180 countries in its 2024 World Press Freedom Index, a stark contrast to its position just two decades ago when it ranked 18th. Meanwhile, China remains near the bottom of the index, ranking 172nd.
Chinese officials in Hong Kong have rejected international criticism of the sentencing, maintaining that Stand News functioned as a political organization rather than a legitimate news outlet.
The government’s position reflects broader efforts to align Hong Kong’s governance and legal frameworks more closely with those of Mainland China, particularly in terms of controlling dissent and regulating the media.
The sentencing of Chung Pui-kuen underscores the growing constraints on press freedom in Hong Kong, further solidifying the city’s shift away from its reputation as a bastion of free speech in Asia.
Media
Mediacorp to merge TODAY digital newsroom with Channel News Asia
Mediacorp, a state-owned media company under Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund, Temasek Holdings, has announced on Wednesday (28 Aug) that the TODAY digital newsroom will merge with Channel News Asia (CNA) on 1 October 2024.
This merger, which will effectively transform TODAY into a digital weekend magazine under CNA, is presented as an effort to consolidate resources and expand CNA’s reach both within Singapore and internationally.
As part of the merger, TODAY will shift its focus to producing long-form analytical features on current issues, in-depth news reports, human interest stories, and opinion pieces under its Big Read brand, which will be published every weekend. This content is intended to supplement CNA’s existing daily digital offerings, with the goal of increasing CNA’s digital traffic and deepening audience engagement, particularly on weekends.
Starting 1 October, the TODAY app and website will no longer be updated, with all new content being channeled through CNA’s platforms. However, TODAY will maintain its social media pages, which will redirect followers to CNA’s digital sites.
Walter Fernandez, Mediacorp’s Editor-in-Chief, framed the merger as a response to global trends, including increased news fatigue and active news avoidance, trends exacerbated by changes in social media algorithms that de-emphasize news content. Fernandez also cited a significant overlap between the digital audiences of TODAY and CNA as a key factor in the decision to merge the two newsrooms.
The merger will not result in job losses, according to Fernandez, as all TODAY staff will be offered roles within CNA. These roles will involve either working on the new weekend magazine or integrating into other teams within CNA, depending on their expertise.
While Mediacorp presents the merger as a strategic response to the evolving media landscape, critics might view this consolidation as part of a broader trend of centralizing media under state influence in Singapore, particularly given Mediacorp’s ownership by Temasek Holdings and the fact that SPH Media Trust, which runs The Straits Times and other vernacular publications such as Lianhe Zaobao, is funded by the Singapore government through a grant of S$900 million.
TODAY, launched in 2000 as a free newspaper and a rival to Streats, another English-language freesheet published by Singapore Press Holdings, quickly rose to prominence as the second-most widely read daily in Singapore. In 2002, TODAY launched a weekend version, WeekendTODAY, which was distributed to homes as a free newspaper and also sold at newsstands for 50 cents.
In 2004, Singapore Telecommunications pulled out of the newspaper venture by selling its 28.51 percent stake in the company for S$13.66 million, following SMRT Corp.’s sale of its 14.56 percent stake for S$3.5 million.
In April 2017, TODAY discontinued its weekend edition, publishing only on weekdays. Later that year, in September, it ceased print publication of its weekday edition, continuing solely as a digital publication.
Despite its achievements, including international recognition for its short-form video content and coverage of youth issues, TODAY has faced significant challenges, such as the controversial suspension of Mr Brown’s column in 2006 after he criticized the government.
The merger also raises questions about the future of media plurality in Singapore, where Mediacorp already holds a dominant position.
Chief Commercial Officer Jacqui Lim sought to reassure advertisers, promising competitive alternatives across Mediacorp’s network, which includes CNA, 8 World, Berita, and Seithi. Lim emphasized that the merger aligns with Mediacorp’s audience-first approach, aiming to provide innovative and effective media solutions.
The post Mediacorp to merge TODAY digital newsroom with Channel News Asia appeared first on Gutzy Asia.
-
Comments1 week ago
Christopher Tan criticizes mrt breakdown following decade-long renewal program
-
Comments4 days ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Current Affairs2 weeks ago
Chee Soon Juan questions Shanmugam’s $88 million property sale amid silence from Mainstream Media
-
Singapore1 week ago
SMRT updates on restoration progress for East-West Line; Power rail completion expected today
-
Singapore1 week ago
Chee Hong Tat: SMRT to replace 30+ rail segments on damaged EWL track with no clear timeline for completion
-
Singapore6 days ago
Train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista to remain disrupted until 1 Oct due to new cracks on East-West Line
-
Singapore5 days ago
Lee Hsien Yang pays S$619,335 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan in defamation suit to protect family home
-
Singapore1 week ago
Major breakdown on East-West Line: SMRT faces third service disruption in a month