Photo Credit: Malaysia Immigration News Update/Facebook

A Singaporean man, who is a retired teacher and a well-known musician, is suing Malaysia’s Immigration Department for RM2.67 million over his 37-day detention in an over-crowded and badly-maintained cell.

Puis Gilbert Louis, who will turn 68 next month, said that his nightmare started when the immigration officers raided his house in Johor Bahru on 9 October 2018 and arrested him.

Based on his statement of claim filed by his lawyer Arun Kasi, the man who owns a valid visa to be in Malaysia until 2 November 2018, was in the house with four other individuals, and one of them was his female friend from the Philippines who also holds a valid visa.

However, the additional three people in the house were friends of his Filipino friend and he is unaware of their origin or their immigration status.

Mr Louis claims that his arrest could be possibly due to the alleged illegal harbouring of the three who were apparently illegal immigrants. But, he expressed that he was not informed if he was arrested for this reason or charged for it.

Detention at Setia Tropika Immigration Office

Upon his arrest, Mr Louis was brought over to the Setia Tropika Immigration Centre (STIC) and during his journey, he managed to use his mobile phone to inform his family and friends of his arrest through Facebook before the officials took away all his belongings including his phone, wallet, cash, house keys, car keys and shoes.

In STIC, he was placed in an over-crowded cell with 100 other detainees. The condition of the space was extremely bad and he could only sleep on a “bare dirty floor beside a foul-smelling squalid open toilet” before he was transferred to the Pekan Nanas immigration camp the next morning.

When he was transported handcuffed the next day to another detention centre, he was kept in an eight-seater truck compartment with about 30 other detainees. This then caused him to have breathing difficulties as he claims to be claustrophobe and suffers from chronic asthma and heart diseases.

With the help of other detainees, he was pushed to an open window in the truck compartment to breathe fresh air, but got completely wet due to the heavy rain that particular day.

Horrible cell condition

Mr Louis claimed that he was detained for the next 36 days until 14 November 2018 and placed in a cell with about 130 people under a cramped condition, although the cell should only house 50 people.

“The condition was so horrifying and terrifying that ordinarily it would not be expected that any human being would be kept under that condition. The toilet was within the cell and was dirty and open. No clean water was available for drinking. Food was provided in an unhygienic condition,” said his statement of claim.

Adding to that, he mentioned that basic necessities were not given to all detainees including mat, pillow, blanket, footwear, toiletries like soap and towel, as well as change of clothing. He also had to walk barefoot and slept on a dirty bare floor.

In fact, he wore the same clothes for the first 14 days, and only got to change his attire after he was brought over to his house so that the immigration officers can look at a CCTV recording there.

As for taking a shower, he only had one after the first 10 days as he managed to purchase soap at an extremely high rate from an alleged privately-operated store.

“A small bottle of drinking water cost RM10. Purchase was limited by amount and time,” revealed his statement of claim, adding that the payments were taken from his wallet kept by immigration officers and from money given by visitors.

Since he was viewed as a relatively rich person, other detainees also took advantage of him and he had to buy items for them in order to avoid being “disturbed or harmed”.

He also said he had to pay RM350 each for three Indonesians for their ferry tickets as they didn’t have the money to get hold of the tickets or were unable to get in touch with their families to arrange for the tickets.

Besides that, Mr Arun also noted that no lawyers were allowed to visit their clients, and family and friends were only given limited access, forcing the lawyer to enter the detention centre posing as Mr Louis’s friend.

Claiming that seeking access to justice was denied by restrictions such as a commissioner of oath not allowed to meet the Singaporean man to have him affirm an affidavit for court purposes, the statement of claim expressed that many other detainees did not communicate with anyone outside for months.

“The condition of detention transgressed all basic standards of detaining humans and was without regard to any minimum standards of humanity and inflicted cruelty against humanity”.

Cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment

Mr Louis said that the treatment he received during his detention “falls within the definition of torture and of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and punishment (CIDTP)” as defined under international conventions. He added that it breaches Article 5 and 7(1) of the Federal Constitution.

In Article 7(1), it is said that no any individual should be punished for actions that were not punishable by law when it was taken, and no one shall suffer greater punishment for an offence than was prescribed by law at the time it was committed.

The statement of claim also revealed that the Singaporean man had written to the Immigration director-general on 1 November 2018 through his lawyers but did not receive any reply, and had also filed a habeas corpus application at the High Court, about a week later (9 November).

However, he was released on 14 November with a seven-day special pass, just a day before his scheduled hearing for his habeas corpus application or challenge against his detention.

Upon his release, the man left Malaysia and his legal challenge was withdrawn because he had been released from detention.

Mr Louis claimed that his detention was unlawful as there was allegedly no valid reason for the arrest and no investigation was done for any offence pressed or no charges pressed against him. He was also not presented before any magistrate.

As such, he pointed out that his arrest violated the Federal Constitution’s Article 5, which says that no one is to be deprived of their personal liberty unless in accordance to law, and that an individual who is arrested shall be told the reasons of the arrest and be allowed to consult lawyers.

On the other hand, Article 5(4) comes with a provision that an arrested non-Malaysian cannot be detained more than 14 days without being brought before a magistrate and with the magistrate’s authority, however a Malaysian has to be produced before a magistrate without unreasonable delay within 24 hours.

Mr Louis also highlighted that infringes on the Constitution’s Article 8(1) promise non-discrimination and equality for all before the law.

As such, he argues that amendment that caused different timeframe given to non-Malaysians shows that it is unconstitutional and unlawful.

In the lawsuit, Mr Louis is seeking a total of RM2.67 million, with RM840, 000 for damages over his distress suffered during his arrest and throughout his detention, and RM1.83 million in other exemplary damages.

He is also seeking a declaration that he was projected to torture and treatment considered CIDTP, and this treatment is prohibited under the Federal Constitution particularly seen in Article 5 and 7. In addition, he also wants a declaration that the amended constitutional clause that allows different treatment for non-Malaysians is unlawful, unconstitutional and invalid.

The lawsuit was filed in the High Court in Kuala Lumpur on 28 May against the Immigration Department of Malaysia’s director-general and the Malaysian government. His lawyer also said that the court papers for the lawsuit have been served on the Attorney General’s Chambers.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Manpower Minister Josephine Teo’s use of POFMA on SDP’s statements are “not appropriate” argues SDP in court

Invoking the use of the Protection From Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act…

社论:与其变成“津贴国” 何不普及化医疗服务?

日前,荣誉国务资政吴作栋在脸书发文指出,新加坡虽然避免了福利国的隐患,但他认为必须慎防陷入“津贴国”的潜在危险。 他认为,英国在70多年前推行福利国制度时,无法预料到今天会承受的巨大负担。“这种制度的根本风险在于–现在看起来对的事情,将来可能出错。” 他说,随着国家的需求、挑战和特征会改变,我们无法预知几代人过后,津贴国会面对怎样的潜在负担。 故此, 他认为必须在政府的责任、社区、家庭和个人之间取得平衡,确保新加坡能持续发展、进步。 换言之,或许新加坡为了避免陷入“福利国”陷阱,反倒成为“津贴国”,一方面国人继续承受各种生活压力,一方面政府则必须这里津贴一点,那里发一些填补,使得整个系统更为繁琐、复杂化,这反倒增加行政上的成本和负担,许多民众也感到混淆,去问问看有多少年长者,究竟能分辨出立国一代配套和建国一代的差别? 医疗乃基本人权 之前,工人党秘书长毕丹星在参与国会辩论时,就曾呼吁落实永久性的乐龄医疗护理配套,让国人只要年满60岁,就能自动享有一系列的基本医疗津贴。 这并不是要我国成为“福利国”,而是保障国人最基本的医疗保健权利,让他们免于无法看病、看不起病的忧虑。如果真得体恤国民,珍惜年长者对国家的牺牲和奉献,那么就应该把看病视作人民的基本权益。 过去,曾有报导指一名年长者因感到无法排尿,到陈笃生医院急诊部门求助。但他申诉,医院职员不让他使用建国一代卡,结果他还要为看诊付105元的费用。 这事件发生在2015年,当时的卫生部的答复是这样的:建国一代卡可用在CHAS社保计划诊所、综合诊所和医院专科门诊,但不包括急诊部门。 这是因为,公共医院急诊部门为紧急意外伤患、有生命危险者服务,为确保病人得到所需紧急治疗,所以急诊部的手费都是划一的。…

4 Executions in 48 Hours — Singapore’s “unprecedented and vicious” rampage

In a span of just 48 hours, no less than four men…

【选举】工人党拿下盛港集选区!

工人党何廷儒、蔡庆威、林志蔚和辣玉莎,成功拿下盛港集选区,行动党原总理公署部长黄志明、原交通部兼卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明医生、原内政部兼卫生部高级政务次长安宁·阿敏落马。 工人党团队得票率52.13巴仙(6万0136张),行动党得票仅47.87巴仙。 盛港集选区结合榜鹅东单选区、盛港西单选区,以及白沙—榜鹅集选区的部分。该选区有12万零166人。