Blurred defocused abstract background of people walking on the street in Orchard Road in Singapore – Crowded city center during rush hour in urban business area zebra crossing – View from building top (Photo by View Apart from Shutterstock.com)

In 2018, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) commissioned a survey and it was revealed that 15.4 per cent of non-Malaysian work permit holders did not receive their in-principle approval (IPA) letter before they enter Singapore. This is a 4 per cent increase compared to the results gathered in 2014, the last time a similar survey was done.

According to the law, employers are supposed to send over the IPA letter to their employees after their permit application is approved and before leaving their home country. It is important as the letter includes vital information like the term and conditions of their employment, including the basic salary.

In fact, it is seen as a de-facto contract, in case other written agreements were not given. As for employers who don’t obey to this rule, they may be fined up to S$10,000.

As reported by The New Paper (TNP), Migrant Workers’ Centre (MWC) chairman Yeo Guat Kwang said that there’s a hike in defiant employers because a number of them are not aware of the rule.

“We need to continue to urge employers to provide the IPA to their workers,” he said while speaking on the sidelines of an NTUC May Day event to celebrate migrant workers.

As such, he pushes foreign workers to report early when they face issues with their IPA letters, especially problems with their salary.

Adding to that, Transient Workers Count Too general manager Ethan Guo told TNP that during a salary disagreement, employers generally have more advantages as work permits are “directly tied” to them.

“Workers who make a complaint to MOM will face premature termination of their jobs, which will leave them vulnerable and potentially be sent home before managing to recover the debts they incurred in taking loans to work here,” he said.

He added, “These days, workers with salary disputes are almost automatically allowed a change of employer. However, the success rate of finding new employment in Singapore is very low”.

Although more foreign workers fail to receive their IPA letter, the survey pointed out that these workers are generally happy with the working conditions in the country and would suggest Singapore to their friends and family to work.

The MOM survey was conducted by market research company Blackbox Research on approximately 2,500 work permit holders and 500 S Pass holders who were randomly polled.

As for their overall assessment, 86.3 per cent of work pass holders and 87.5 per cent of S Pass holders noted that they were satisfied working in the city-state, a similar results to the survey conducted in 2014.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

我国首个经营二万五脚车业者 SG Bike成功收购摩拜执照

共享脚车业者SG Bike今天宣布,已经成功收购了摩拜(Mobike)的营业执照,成为能够在我国经营2万5000辆脚车的业者,更是我国最大的共享脚车业者。 目前我国还有另外两家获准经营一万辆脚车的共享脚车业者,即随行单车(Anywheel)和Moov Technology(简称Moov)。 面对有关的交易,SG Bike总裁Sean Tay指出,脚车仍然是最灵活的交通工具,因此相信这一共识能让该公司加速共享脚车的使用量。 总部设于北京的摩拜于今年3月,首次宣布计划退出新加坡市场,以作为合理化东南亚业务的努力之一。当时该公司表示正在探索数种可能性,包括将业务转交给其他公司,以最大程度地减少对消费者的影响。 总部设于上海的Obike,也于去年6月突然宣布推出新加坡市场。 应用程序可解锁二公司脚车 由脚车租赁公司Park Cosco…

Unfortunately politicised

By Andrew Loh When the Citizens’ Consultative Committees (CCCs) were set up…

Ng E-Jay – TOC's Blogger of the Year

~by: Dr Wong Wee Nam~ I first met E-Jay in 2007. Chia…

Execution of Singaporean Tamil condemned by UN Experts: Call for moratorium on death penalty

United Nations experts strongly condemn Singapore’s recent execution of Tangaraju s/o Suppiah, calling for an immediate moratorium on capital punishment. They express concerns over inadequate interpretation during police interrogations in his conviction and the high rate of execution notices for drug-related offenses. The experts criticize Singapore’s mandatory sentencing law, discriminatory treatment of minorities, and the suspension of the death penalty moratorium. They urge Singapore to review the death penalty’s scope, limit it to cases involving intentional killing, and abolish it to protect the right to life. Tangaraju represented himself in court as no lawyers in Singapore were willing to take up his case. Human rights lawyer Mr Ravi highlighted the fear of cost orders and disciplinary actions faced by lawyers who take up such cases.