Photo Credit: Lianain Films/Facebook

The streets of Hong Kong were filled with over one million people yesterday (9 June) as they gathered in a mass protest against the government’s controversial extradition bill, says the organiser.

Hong Kong Free Press (HKFP) reported that Jimmy Sham, a spokesperson for organisers, noted that approximately 1.03 million people took part in the rally – a figure that was collected by volunteers along Hennessy Road. However, the police said that only around 270,000 people were part of the protest during its peak.

If the organiser’s figure is accurate, then it would be the largest demonstration in Hong Kong since the territory was given to China by the British in 1997.

Photo Credit: Lianain Films/Facebook

The Sunday’s rally was organised by the Civil Human Rights Front, a coalition of pro-democracy groups to stop the proposed extradition law that would allow suspects to be sent to mainland China to face trial.

The Hong Kong’s government first proposed amendments in the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance (FOO) and the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Ordinance (MLAO) in February this year to enable the city to handle case-by-case extraction request from jurisdictions without any prior agreement.

This happened in response to the murder of Poon Hui-wing, a 20-year-old Hong Kong woman who died during a trip to Taiwan last February. Although Hong Kong authorities managed to arrest Poon’s boyfriend Chan Tong-kai, but were not able to charge him with murder in local courts. Taiwan authorities have requested that he be extradited, but the Hong Kong government told that they have no such arrangements with Taipei.

As such, the newly proposed amendments in the law would allow the chief executive (Carrie Lam) and local courts to manage extradition requests without legislative oversight and can reach a final decision before the end of the current legislative period in July.

During yesterday’s protest, people were heard chanting “Scrap the evil law”, “Oppose China extradition” and “Carrie Lam resign”.

Photo Credit: Lianain Films/Facebook

HK Lau, who is a retired civil servant told HKFP that he thinks the extradition law would put a stop to the One Country Two Systems principle. “Communist China never changed. If anything has changed it is that they are richer and more powerful, and now it’s spreading,” he said.

In addition to that, Claudia Mo, the pro-democracy camp’s convenor also told the news site that Ms Lam was pushing for the bill following the instruction given from Beijing.

“The apparent grand plan, complete with the Greater Bay Area scheme, is to assimilate Hong Kong into the vast hinterland. The idea is to, ultimately, disappear Hong Kong, or at least to change it into one of the numerous Chinese cities…like a little boat, Hong Kong is sinking fast, but we’re not taking this lying down, we have to put up a fight.”

Despite a massive uproar from the people, the government insisted that the law will allow to close a legal “loophole” in the system. But, different parties like lawyers, journalistsforeign politicians and businesses have highlighted their concerns over the risk of people being extradited to the mainland.

In response to the rally, the Government had released a statement noting that “it acknowledges and respects that people have different views on a wide range of issues” and noted that the march was overall “peaceful and orderly” apart from some traffic issues.

As for the tabling of FOO and MLAO, the Government defended its stand and said that it had explained its reasons on multiple occasions.

The Government reiterated that, firstly, the bill was prompted by the murder of a Hong Kong citizen in Taiwan which brought into sharper focus deficiencies of the existing regime dealing with mutual legal assistance in criminal matters and the surrender of fugitives.

If these deficiencies were not addressed as a matter of priority, Hong Kong would continue to be a bolt-hole for criminals, putting residents’ safety at risk and disregarding its international responsibilities in the fight against cross-border and transnational crimes.

Secondly, the bill covers only the most serious crimes punishable by imprisonment of seven years or more, that is, cases that would normally be tried in Hong Kong’s High Court, and the crimes must exist in the laws of both Hong Kong and the requesting jurisdiction before a surrender request will be processed.

Thirdly, none of these serious criminal offences relate to the freedom of assembly, of the press, of speech, of academic freedom or publication. And no surrender for a political offence or if the purported charges are in fact on account of race, religion, nationality or political opinions.

Fourthly, executive and judicial safeguards built into the system protect all the human rights enshrined in the Basic Law and Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance and ensure that any requests for assistance or surrender are legal, and subject to challenge and review up to the Court of Final Appeal.

Furthermore, as guaranteed under the Basic Law, the courts of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region exercise judicial power independently, free from any interference.

In addition, the chief executive would not be able to “bypass the Court to surrender a fugitive to any requesting party including the Mainland”. As such the Government noted that its proposals are “firmly grounded in the rule of law”.

“Noting that the Second Reading debate on the bill will resume on June 12, the Government urged the Legislative Council to scrutinise the bill in a calm, reasonable and respectful manner to help ensure Hong Kong remains a safe city for residents and business.”

Just two months ago, in April, thousands of Hongkongers marched in protest of the proposal as democrats tried to prevent the bill from passing at the legislature. The Government is trying its best to speed-up the bill’s movement through the legislature, demanding that it comes in play at the main chamber by Wednesday as it hopes that it will pass before the summer break next month.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

吴家和转贴网民暖心故事 虽欠费仍获校方通融发成绩单正本

日前,失业者互助网站 Transitioning.org创办人吴家和脸书发文,指有清寒子弟原本只能领取小六会考成绩单影本,所幸有好心人帮忙缴清学费,才成功领成绩单正本。 今日吴家和再转发网民留言,该名网友哈兹丽娜(Hazellina)分享自身的遭遇,他们因一时经济拮据无法支付两名孩子的学费,但比较幸运的是,孩子的学校并没有因此被拒绝领成绩单正本。 她公开她与丈夫的收入。哈兹丽娜本身收入达1363新元(未扣除公积金),而丈夫收入也仅约1400-1500元,加起来达2863元。 然而根据教育部官网,要申请经济援助计划(FAS),条件之一是家户总收入必须少过2750元,或人均月入不得超过690元。显然哈兹丽娜一家不符合该条件。 原本住租赁组屋 再者,哈兹丽娜也分享,他们一家才刚在一年前购买四房式的组屋。 至于为何会选择购屋,相信是收入已不符合租赁组屋条件,哈兹丽娜指被建屋局告知他们的公积金已足够买房。他指出,此前他们租赁组屋的月租仅338元。 在建屋局官网则显示,租赁组屋的申请条件,家户总收入需不超过1500元。 仍打起精神过日子 Hazellina称,买房后他们也无多余的钱购置其他家具如床或衣柜,一家人仅睡在床垫,其余的钱则必须用于支付生活和交通开销,以及缴付厨房柜的贷款。 尽管生活拮据,但他们仍然必须要打起精神过日子。网友表示,在看见吴家和的帖文后,相当感谢吴家和与其他善心人士的帮忙。 吴家和也感谢文园小学校长的特别通融,让有关学生获得了正本,同时也谢谢为其他孩子解困的善心人士。…

SDP’s Dr Chee Soon Juan reveals dangerous state of lampposts at Bukit Batok; pushes MP Murali Pillai to take care of his estate

The Secretary-General of Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) Chee Soon Juan took to…

律师裘佐柏:“泼马”法乃行动党恐惧政治下的产物

律师裘佐柏(Khush Chopra)纵览来自国会朝野议员辩论、媒体、本地民间公民组织和国际群体的意见,他总结《防假消息法》弊多于利。 他说,已有足够多的国内外个人或团体,有者也出席了去年的听证会,提供了对打击假消息的建议,但是政府无意进行修改并执意通过《防止网络假消息与网络操纵法》(POFMA,以下简称“泼马”),令他感到失望。 他批评,政治领袖利用恐惧来对付人民,以人民的福祉作要挟。 裘佐柏是在本月18日,首要出席由功能八号氏族会于共同社举行的《防假消息法:弊多于利?》座谈会。 裘佐柏是一名致力推动建设性改革的非执业律师,公认为是一名受瞩目的国内时事评论员之一,也勇于对他认为正确的信念站出来发声。 “你可能觉得我过于苛刻,但根据近期的路透社机构意见调查,有63巴仙的国人担心他们会因为在网络发表政治异见会招来麻烦。” 至于另一时事脸书专页Wake Up进行的民调,显示在1800名受访者中,有96巴仙表示反对《防假消息法》。 行动党政府灌输恐惧 他说,可能有者以为,既然《防假消息法》有诸多争议,那么如果行动党滥权,就会在选举中为此付出代价;然而事实上,在选举中会出现很明显该国理智的情绪票:害怕被报复和失去福利的恐惧。 他说,行动党政府从过去就有灌输恐惧的记录。从过去以共产党、马克思主义阴谋等为由,利用内安法令未审先扣,或多年来利用诽谤诉讼等进行惩罚性报复,“我敢说,这些常年来累积的恐惧,已经深植于国人的心理。”…

SCCB study: Singapore business sentiments dropped to all-time low due to Covid-19

On Tuesday (10 March), the Singapore Commercial Credit Bureau’s (SCCB) released its…