The nagging question of Ho Ching’s salary as CEO of Temasek Holdings does not appear to be one that is about to disappear into the sunset. Indeed, it appears to be one that is raised periodically by opposition politicians, media outlets and the like. According to reports, it would seem that this is an issue that raises the heckles of her husband who is also our Prime Minister, Mr Lee Hsien Loong (PM Lee).

Attempting to address the issue in Parliament, Second Finance Minister Lawrence Wong has said that “the government has an ‘arms-length’ relationship with Temasek and GIC and that the government refrains from interfering with their Boards’ decisions, such as the appointment of Ho Ching as CEO of Temasek.”

He further added that “salaries at Temasek and GIC are decided respectively by independent boards.” In isolation, that may well be an acceptable answer but then, this isn’t a straightforward issue of a private company deciding the salaries of its employees. Rather, Temasek is a unique company that straddles between private and public.

While ostensibly a private company, it also manages state assets which are clearly of public interest. Not to mention the fact that its CEO is the wife of our current Prime Minister! This would mean that apart from Temasek’s affairs being arguably of public interest, there is also a potential argument for a case of conflict of interest!

Where are the checks and balances when state assets are managed by the wife of the man who holds the highest political office in the land? Lest we forget, Madam Ho is not a public servant which means that we may never know why or how decisions are made. What is there in place to prevent state assets being potentially used to keep her husband in power?  In the first place, Madam Ho should never have been made CEO of Temasek.  Not only was she made CEO but she has been a long standing one whose salary appears to be opaque. While I am not suggesting that any actual wrongdoing has taken place, the fact that this factual matrix exists means that it will always be a subject of contention, controversy and suspicion.

Added to the apparent murkiness is the seeming detraction whenever that question is indeed raised. No one ever answers directly. Why is it such a secret? Perhaps Madam Ho does not feel that she is compelled to disclose her personal income because she is not a public servant. However, even if she is not technically on the payroll of the state, she is still the wife of the most powerful man in Singapore who is at the helm of Singapore’s most powerful private/public company. With that in mind, isn’t she obligated to be more transparent and open?

The more her salary isn’t disclosed, the more there will be speculation that something untoward is happening even if that isn’t the case. In this case, I would think that her dual role as the de facto first lady and as the CEO of the powerful private / public hybrid company that is Temasek should trump her desire for privacy if that is the reason why she is not divulging her earnings.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

JTC signed S$500 million worth of investment agreements at Singapore Airshow 2020

On Tuesday (11 Feb), agreements worth S$500 million have been inked by…

2016年曾有本地雇主诬陷女佣偷窃 遭判监七周

樟宜机场集团主席前廖文良,指控印尼籍女佣偷窃,惟案件最终获平反,五项控状都获撤销。 案件引起社会关注,高庭法官陈成安在判词中提及,廖文良一家举报女佣偷窃,背后动机有疑点,存在“不当意图”。对于高庭判决也促使总检察署表示,将再研究廖举报女佣的行为和动机,再决定是否采取进一步行动。 由于不希望女佣案判决影响公司,廖文良已在昨晚(10日)宣布卸下樟宜机场集团主席等职务。他在声明中解释,当初报警是因为“若对方有犯罪嫌疑,报警让有关当局调查,是在尽公民义务。”   他也指过程中积极配合调查, 如今总检察署将检讨此案,他也表示和家人仍会给予配合。 回溯2016年,曾有一名幼教老师,因诬陷家庭女佣投了她的金饰,结果被检控,最终判坐牢七周。 这名雇主名为德赛(Desai Asti Amit ),不满她家中印度籍女佣金梅(Kinmei)的表现,但后者曾两度要求离职都不被允许。 而一次金梅陪同雇主儿子到游乐场玩,德赛变乘机把金饰和一个金属的祭祀杯,偷偷塞进金梅的行李箱中,有意栽赃嫁祸。隔日,金梅逃离雇主前往福利机构。当时她也只戴了钱包、手机和护照,行李箱还留在雇主家中。…

Nursing home’s license revoked for failing to comply with COVID-19 measures and other shortcomings

The license of a Thian Leng Old Folks Home, a nursing home…

安全宿舍再现病例,检测有漏网之鱼? 陈诗龙称冠病有潜伏期

近期,不少本来已被列为安全的客工宿舍,因出现新的冠病19确诊,再次被列为感染群。这包括:榜鹅S11宿舍、Cassia@Penjuru宿舍、大士南宿舍CDPL和克兰芝第一客工宿舍等。 回溯8月15日,人力部长杨莉明,曾在个人官方脸书发文,宣称客工宿舍已脱离“危机模式”。然而,直至本月5日,她又改口称“被列为安全宿舍,不代表不会再有人感染”。 然而,当所客工宿舍完成检测、被鉴定为安全。目前每日仍平均新增45例客工病例。其中有两巴仙的血清检测呈阳性,这意味着他们早前已受感染。 这是否意味着,目前的聚合酶链式反应(PCR)检测不够敏感? 不过总理公署部长、人力部兼贸工部第二部长陈诗龙,则解释,上述检测是探测人体冠病是否达一定含量,若客工在病毒潜伏期检测,可能病毒含量不足以被探测到。 在本月9日的跨部门记者会,陈诗龙如是反驳PCR检测下有漏网之鱼的说法,也强调上述测试是十分敏感的。但检测只能反映有关测试客工当下的情况,若在潜伏期、病毒含量不足,仍难以发现。 再者,也有部分患者无症状,当下无法被察觉。 当局目前仍每两周一次检测宿舍客工,若出现新增病例,则需封锁整座宿舍,并为所有人检测。而及早发现病例尤为重要,以能采取行动断开传播链。 陈诗龙也表示,迄今政府已成功遏止200座重现病例的宿舍内的疫情传播。而重新病例的数量也较少,约为少过10例。