The Singapore dental fraternity is up in arms over the possibility of a conflict of interest in relation to the introduction of certificate of competencies and restriction framework for dentists who are general practitioners.

It is understood that a report with the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau has also been filed over the matter. No other details are available about this report.

This latest development comes at the back of a previous story which illustrated how the dental fraternity had asked for a Special General Meeting to be convened by the Singapore Dental Association (SDA) over the issue of Certificate of Competencies and restriction of framework involving the general practitioners.

Over the last week, more information has started to flow through which gives a better inkling of the issue at hand.

At the core of what the fraternity seems to be upset about is the lack of information flowing through which could affect livelihoods, and further elevated costs for members of the public.

What has also surfaced is the potential conflict of interest involving a key official at the Singapore Dental Council (SDC).

The President of the SDC Chew Chong Lin is an independent director of Aoxin Q&M, which is listed in Singapore and is linked to Q&M dental group, which is also listed.

This is significant because one of the reasons there is a body of unhappy dentists is over the fact that Q&M dental group has been at the forefront of all the changes being introduced by the SDC over the certificate of competencies and restriction framework.

For example, even before the general dental body or its members approve of any changes to the way dentistry is practiced in Singapore, especially over the COC, Q&M dental group has started making announcements over how it was planning to start a dental college and provide post-graduate dental courses for dentists in Singapore.

In a report in Philips Capital in November, it was stated that Q&M had potential new business in education.

This was even before any changes had been agreed upon and approved by SDC, SDA or even the dentists.

The Philips Capital report even mentions how the Ministry of Health was intending to release ‘new regulation’ in 1-2 years to require dentists practising aesthetic procedures to obtain a “Certificate of Competency” and that Q&M is positioning themselves to be accredited as a teaching college.

Q&M dental group also made an announcement through the Straits Times on 2 May that it was forming the first dental college in Singapore to provide additional training for post-graduate students.

With the Special General Meeting at the SDA slated to take place on Sunday at the Raffles Town Club, dentists are expected to raise this issue of conflict of interest and also if the SDA had acted in the interests of the dental fraternity over this matter of the COC and restriction framework.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PMO: Smart Nation and Digital Government Office to be formed starting from 1 May

Prime Minister Office (PMO) has announced that it will form the Smart…

PAP’s Lawrence Wong: SDP’s Paul Tambyah’s remarks on MOM’s advisory to employers were baseless and false; netizens cited ST’s report to support Paul Tambyah

The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chairman Paul Tambyah’s allegations of the Ministry…

总理起诉许渊臣 林鼎将担任辩护律师

针对新加坡总理李显龙起诉本社总编许渊臣,林鼎将担任后者的辩护律师。预计聆讯将在下月30日进行至12月4日。 2019年9月5日,本社总编收到代表总理李显龙的达文星律师楼( Davinder Singh Chambers LLC)寄来的原告诉状和法庭传票。 诉状中,对本社英语站发表《总理夫人何晶奇怪地分享了一篇与家人断绝关系》的文章,总理提出异议,指该文章作出不实和无根据,并且贬低和诋毁总理。 去年9月27日,许渊臣提呈答辩书。许渊臣认为内容是复述李总理弟妹的话,并不具诽谤性质。 林鼎在今日在脸书公开讲作为本社总编辩护律师的消息,指出他赞赏许渊臣和《网络公民》作为独立媒体的工作,也强调替代媒体作为民主制度中第四权的重要。正是这类替代媒体能确保有权势和社会精英能继续接受问责。 许渊臣则表示,由于面对许多法律技术层面的挑战,不得已而寻求律师id协助。他也担忧总理的律师在审讯时挑起法律上的失误,为此需要有一名代表。此前,许一直在审讯中为自己辩护。 除了许渊臣,林鼎律师也代表时评人梁实轩,在面对总理的诽谤诉讼中辩护。 I…

破坏地下水管致38户断水逾九小时 承包商遭罚款5.65万元!

根据公用事业局文告,本地一家建筑承包商丰明建筑公司(Feng Ming Construction),因进行未经批准的打桩工程,结果破坏地下水管,导致饮用水源流失,为此该公司被罚款5万6500元。 这也是该公司第二次受罚。 2019年9月,配合武吉知马一带杜尼安路的道路拓宽工程,这家公司进行铁板桩打桩,但却导致地下大水管破裂,结果38户家庭断水约9个半小时。 损失的水源,达到46万8000公升,足足等于奥林匹克游泳池的20巴仙! 经过调查,丰明建筑确实知道该地带有地下水管,却未进行足够勘测,确定水管位置。再者,也没有按要求在进行打桩工程前取得公用事业局批准。 2013年,该公司曾因为破坏芽笼一巷的大水管,而被罚款4万元。