Source: Reuters

This year’s International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia witnessed a significant moment in the history of LGBTQ rights as Taiwan’s parliamentarians pass Asia’s first same-sex marriage legislation today (17 May), despite strong opposition from the public as seen in the results of a referendum last Nov.

Results of the referendum revealed that more than 70 per cent of people surveyed were opposed to the legalisation of same-sex marriages in Taiwan, and were keen on preserving marriage rights exclusively for heterosexual couples, Bloomberg reported.

In 2017, Taiwan’s Constitutional Court ruled that the existing law, which only permitted and recognised marriage as being only between a man and a woman, was unconstitutional, resulting in a verdict whereby the Taipei parliament was given two years to amend or enact new laws regarding such unions until 24 May this year.

Lawmakers today voted on three draft bills, with one of them being a marriage equality Bill tabled by the Cabinet and the other two Bills put forth by conservative groups pushing for a “watered-down” “civil-union” in opposition of legalising same-sex marriage.

The progressive Bill tabled by the Cabinet was passed 66 to 27 votes, supported by Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen’s Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which holds the majority in the House.

The Cabinet’s Bill incorporates the word “marriage” and covers adoption rights for same-sex couples, albeit limited ones. The Bills put forth by conservatives included no adoption rights.

President Tsai said that while she acknowledged that the question of same-sex marriages has caused deep divisions in “families, generations and even inside religious groups” in Taiwan, she argued that the Cabinet’s Bill was the only one that was aligned with the Constitutional Court’s judgement.

Lai Shyh-bao of the opposition Kuomintang party, who acted as one of the proponents of the “civil union” Bills, however, argued that “The cabinet’s bill ignores the referendum results and that is unacceptable.”

President Tsai tweeted in support of the Bill today just before its passing:

She wrote: “Good morning . Today, we have a chance to make history & show the world that progressive values can take root in an East Asian society.”

“Today, we can show the world that ,” she added.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

IPS: 8% voters swing votes from PAP to opposition while 3% from opposition to PAP

The Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) presented its post-election survey at a…

易华仁:防假消息法料下半年生效

通讯与新闻部长易华仁在昨日(15日)接受彭博社访问,指出预期能在下月二读及三读通过《防止网络假消息及网络操纵法》。若按照正常立法程序,该草案有望在今年下半年生效。 针对反对有关草案的声音,易华仁重申防假消息法不会用来阻碍批评、个人观点、恶搞或讽喻。“我们希望所有国民都是知情、有建设性地讨论,思想的竞辩应是基于事实的。” 他补充政府寻求“在新加坡最能行得通的方案”,而采取“中间路线”,言论自由不受拘束。 “我们想针对的是“假消息”–或者律师会称之为“不实事实”,如何影响公共利益。” 他指出,只有当假消息影响公共利益时,政府才会发出更正指示。 对于防假消息法第三部分,对于涉嫌发布假消息者发布更正指示,易华仁解释,这不是为了压制信息,而是让读者自行去分辨真伪。 针对防假消息法的刑罚,易华仁提到世界各地的相关立法,也有一些较严厉的惩罚,事实上新加坡政府已经调整过,以针对那些不遵守指示、在网络刻意散播假消息者、且他们清楚知道将构成公共危害。 “建立网络管理机制” 他说,从法律角度来看,这是较高的裁决门槛,“我认为我们是在建立网络管理机制。迄今为止,社交媒体舆论和网络的事实都未获得规范管理。”易华仁在受访时如是指出。 彭博社主持人也提出,有者质疑防假消息法,赋予部长过大的权力,对此易华仁坚信,已有足够的制衡机制,“即便部长可以发出更正指示,但是我们设立法律原则,来裁定何谓意见还是事实……这是由法庭来决定的。” “所以,这不是政府决策者可以任意裁定的。”他强调。 “不仅科技公司,政府也要采取主动”…

网友爆料有社区猫被安置在垃圾槽区内,淡滨泥市镇会发文致歉

社区猫咪被安置在垃圾槽区里头,爱猫网民担忧猫咪被移走选择报警处理,最终淡滨尼市镇理事会承认处理方式有疏失,于本周一(18日)公开道歉。 22岁的Rachel Ong上周五,于上周在脸书上发文称,发现两名清洁工正安置一只猫在垃圾槽区中,当事人曾询问清洁工该猫是否属于居民的宠物,但清洁工却置之不理。随后,她试图联系当地市议会却联络不上,最后选择报警处理。 从两段视频中可听见猫在垃圾槽区中响亮的叫声,Rachel试图以喵叫寻找猫的踪影: 然而第二段视频则是可见猫正在瑟瑟发抖,张嘴用力呼吸,Rachel表示可能是因为猫被困住时过度紧张才会出现的过度反应。 据更新帖文表示,警方与猫福利协会(Cat Welfare Society)随后到场协调,并将猫带出去。 淡滨尼市镇会本周一亦发文证实在处理动物安置上确实有缺陷,并公开向居民道歉。市镇会表示,已多次收到有猫在居民单位外尿尿和排便,因此有居民反映要求解决问题。 然而,市镇会称的工作人员资历较浅,因此在安置猫的问题上并没有太多的经验,所以才将猫安置在垃圾槽区。 市镇会也强调,从来未有伤害猫的想法。 猫福利协会亦向《海峡时报》透露,目前已将猫重新送回社区内,而且经了解,该区经常收到将猫另外安顿的要求,而且虽然猫的失踪愈来愈多,类似的要求也愈来愈多,但两者是否有相关仍未知。 “虽然安置可能是猫失踪的原因,但也有可能是其他原因造成。”

Increase in Court of Appeal’s caseload may result in the formation of new appellate court

On Monday (22 April), Senior Minister of State for Law and Health…