Malaysia’s Sedition Act will be repealed, replaced with a new law, or its provisions placed under the penal code sometime this year, says Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Liew Vui Keong.

Datuk Liew, who is also the de facto Law Minister, said that the repeal of the colonial-era law will allow for more freedom of expression in the country, adding that even so the defamatory safeguards towards royalty will be preserved.

He said, “We will have a new Act to replace it or alternatively, it will be placed under the Penal Code and will include certain sections that cover defamation towards the royal institution. Under the Sedition Act, the definition of sedition is quite narrow. We want to ensure not all statements can be seditious. Certain statements can be allowed some freedom.

“We do not mind if the government is criticised, if it is constructive,” he said in a special interview marking Pakatan Harapan (PH)’s first year in office.

As part of their manifesto, PH had pledged to reform several laws including the Sedition Act, Anti-Fake News Act, Security Offences (Special Measures Act (SOSMA), Prevention of Crime Act, and the National Security Council Act.

So far, the repeal of the Anti-Fake News Act was passed in the lower house of Parliament (Dewan Rakyat) but rejected in the Dewan Negara in September 2018 which is dominated by the opposition.

Datuk Liew assured reporters that the government was committed that the Sedition Act will go and that the Cabinet had already given it a green light. He added, “I expect the Act to be abolished this year. It should be tabled in Parliament in July or October.”

However, lawyers have called for the government to completely abolish the Sedition Act and forgot any replacement, saying there is no need for it. Lawyer and Malaysian representative to the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) said in a series of tweets that the law was archaic and repressive, adding that it “belongs in the dustbin of history together with other colonial era laws.”

He said, “It’s a mark of shame of any independent nation to continue having colonial era legislation like the Sedition Act that was then used to suppress freedom fighters & civil liberties & continue to do so after independence”.

Mr Paulsen said that while it is well established that freedom of speech is not absolute, the threshold should be high and that any restriction on the freedom of speech ‘must be necessary, proportionate, and provided by law for legitimate grounds.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

管后港市镇会遭“刁难”刘程强诉辛酸 诉方坚称工人党内定FMSS

工人党前秘书长刘程强议员,叙述90年代时期工人党接管后港市镇会曾遭“刁难”,管理面对重重困难。 其中,刘程强提及在1991年大选夺得后港选取后,同年9月30日,收到建屋发展局通知,将在12月31日终止对后港的管理服务,也给刘程强期限撤出原有办公室。 刘程强说,建屋局后来告知,需要40周(10个月)来重建新办公室,又不肯延长现有办公室的使用期限,他只好找亲友和建筑师的协助下另寻办公室,所幸还能在期限当天搬入新址。 他也必须招募和培训新班底,协助管理后港市镇会,避免服务中断。 没拨款  选民承担更高水、杂费 ”然而,接下来日子仍荆棘满途。90年代中期,建屋局进一步终止后港市镇会24小时紧急服务和电脑系统。同时,也没有获政府拨款开展任何提升计划。“ 他说,这导致后港市镇会设施比起行动党选区少、市镇会也需花更多钱维修旧设施。结果,后港选民必须承担更高昂的水费、服务与杂费(S&CC),间接也影响了选民对工人党好感。 刘程强于昨日获法院传召,为工人党市镇会诉讼第一答辩人。他在48页的宣誓书中”诉苦“,叙述管理后港市镇会的惨痛经验。 辩方律师也引述刘程强管理后港市镇会的经验,成为后来2011年管理阿裕尼市镇会的参照。 刘程强也指出,建国总理李光耀还曾在2011年大选的群众大会上,公然指出反对党选区房屋价值比邻近行动党选区的房价低,藉此呼吁阿裕尼集选区人民投给行动党。 他也补充,另两位民主党议员–1991年胜选、分别管理武吉甘柏区的林孝谆和义顺中区的蒋才正也面对同样挑战。当地选民反映,两者无法妥善管理选区,才在97年选举丢失议席。…

Ms Teo: Govt, unions and employers all agree retirement, re-employment ages of elderly should be raised

In Parliament today (5 Mar), Manpower Minister Josephine Teo told Parliament that…

Satays protest Straits Times’ headlines

Satays simmer with anger over ST’s use of the word ‘grilled’. By…