Minister of Law and Home Affairs saying that there is no civil liability for sharing of fake news.

On Thursday (9 May), tech and lifestyle site Vulcan Post posted a video where they had invited the Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam to answer some questions asked by netizens regarding the controversial Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Bill (POFMA).

One of the questions that was raised was whether an individual will go to jail if he or she shares a fake news.

As a reply, Mr Shanmugam clearly said that if a person receives a news and forward it in good faith, then there is no problem with it at all.

“There is no criminal liability, there is not civil liability. At most, you will receive a correction. So you don’t even need to worry about jail and so one,” he said.

The Minister added that the Bill will only affect those who deliberately create fake news – either to make money or to cause trouble. In fact, he reassures that citizens do not have to be worried about going behind bars if they’re merely sharing or forwarding fake news.

Based on Mr Shanmugam’s explanation, it brings us to a very important question. If sharing fake news is not wrong, then why is veteran blogger Leong Sze Hian being sued by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in a civil suit for just sharing an article on Facebook without adding any comments?

Last November, the blogger shared a link of an article that had been published by The Coverage on his Facebook page, without comment or amendment. The article claimed that editor-in-chief of investigative journalism platform Sarawak Report Ms Clare Rewcastle had mentioned Singapore as “one of the key investigation targets, alongside Switzerland and United States” in the 1MDB corruption scandal during an interview with Malaysian media. The article was shared over 20,000 times largely by Singaporeans and Malaysians.

However, just three days later, Mr Leong removed his post after reading a notice from the Info-communications Media Development Authority (IMDA) demanding that the post be taken down.

Although he complied to the request and removed his post, the blogger received a letter from PM Lee’s lawyer alleging that the Facebook post had been published with malicious intent and that both the post and the article “contains allegations that are highly defamatory to (their) client”. As such, on 4 December 2018, PM Lee filed a defamation suit against him.

According to how the Law Minister explained the Bill, it clearly shows that Mr Leong should not be getting into any trouble for sharing an article, but PM Lee still went ahead and sued him.
 
Looking at this example, could the Law Minister be openly disagreeing with PM Lee’s legal approach?
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

ST Chief Editor on his editors having affairs with intern: Don’t believe everything you read online

TOC first broke the news yesterday (3 Oct) that one of the…

狮城有”将野生动物送动物园“迷思 著名动物学家冀尽早让孩童认识生态之美

英国生物学家珍·古德( Dr Jane Goodall)认为,应该让小孩自小就接触大自然,发现生态之美,“至关重要的点在于,让孩子从小就与自然接触,走进大自然里,一旦孩子发现生态是如何成长时,他们会发现这些其实都相当迷人。” “新加坡是一个当人民在家中发现了一条蛇,便下意识求助并要求将它送进“动物园”的国家,因为人民都认为那是属于蛇的家。” 但在珍·古德眼里,这是相当震惊的一件事。她表示,尽管已来到新加坡数次,但却从未听闻这种心态,因为对她而言,动物不应该在动物园,而是回到野外。 珍·古德教育昨日(26日)协同保育协会新加坡区举办首届“保育行动周”(ConservAction Week),邀请来自亚洲各地的专家与研究员,在期间互相分享学习野生动物保育和环境保护信息。 以上对话则是在新闻发布会上,回应Eco-Business副主编罗宾希克斯的提问。现场有人举表示经常在新加坡收到类似的要求,比如将飞禽走兽移至动物园,显然新加坡虽是高度城市化的岛屿,但却缺乏对野生动物相关知识。 对此,珍·古德认为教育成为至关重要的因素,让孩子尽可能从小进入大自然。 唯有教育才能打破迷思 珍·古德是著名灵长类动物学家,长期致力于黑猩猩的野外研究纠正了许多学术界对黑猩猩这一物种长期以来的错误认识,揭示了许多黑猩猩社群中鲜为人知的秘密。…

Parts of lift ceiling fell and injured family at Pasir Ris Drive 4

Part of the lift’s ceiling at Block 480, Pasir Ris Drive 4,…